Brown Ashley, Woods-Brown Clair, Hunt Kate
Institute for Social Marketing and Health, University of Stirling, Stirling, FK9 4LA, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 5;25(1):2100. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23249-3.
Smokefree prison policies reduce smoking-related harms among those living and working in prisons. Helping people released from smokefree prisons to remain abstinent post-release could deliver considerable additional benefits given high rates of relapse and the substantial burden of smoking on health. However, understanding of post-release smoking behaviour and the best ways to support people leaving prison who want to stop smoking for good is limited. No previous studies have explored how access to vapes in smokefree prisons may help or hinder people to remain tobacco-free post-release. The current study aimed to explore potential enablers and barriers to long-term tobacco abstinence after being released from a smokefree prison.
Qualitative interviews conducted between 2022 and 2024 with people in prison (n = 27) and prison, health and third sector staff (n = 8) were transcribed and thematically analysed using the COM-B ('capability', 'opportunity', 'motivation' and 'behaviour') model of behaviour change to map facilitators and barriers to smoking abstinence post-release.
People leaving prison face substantial barriers to staying tobacco-free. Interactions between people rationalising smoking in the face of recognised harms ('capability'), tobacco availability (post-release), pro-smoking norms, service limitations ('opportunity'), competing needs and priorities and drug and alcohol use ('motivation') were identified as barriers. In contrast, desires to quit smoking and other 'addictions' which have caused substantial damage in people's own and others' lives, access to 'smoking cessation' services in prisons and positive social influence were identified as facilitators. Access to vapes in prison was perceived to have the potential to help or to hinder post-release smoking abstinence based on individual preferences and experiences.
Reducing tobacco-related harms among people leaving prison and the communities they return to would help to reduce health inequalities and support other critical areas of public health and social justice work. Greater success requires overcoming considerable challenges, including those constraining prison and health services' abilities to support positive behaviour change. Improved collaboration across services and expanded use of appropriately supported peer mentors and digital health interventions, may be both helpful and feasible in the current climate for reducing tobacco-related harms in a priority group.
无烟监狱政策可减少在监狱中生活和工作的人员与吸烟相关的危害。鉴于复吸率高以及吸烟对健康造成的沉重负担,帮助从无烟监狱释放的人员在释放后保持戒烟状态可能会带来相当大的额外益处。然而,对于释放后的吸烟行为以及支持想要永久戒烟的出狱人员的最佳方式,我们的了解有限。此前尚无研究探讨在无烟监狱中获取电子烟如何可能有助于或阻碍人们在释放后保持无烟状态。本研究旨在探讨从无烟监狱释放后长期戒烟的潜在促进因素和障碍。
2022年至2024年期间,对监狱中的人员(n = 27)以及监狱、卫生和第三部门工作人员(n = 8)进行了定性访谈,并对访谈内容进行了转录,然后使用行为改变的COM-B(“能力”、“机会”、“动机”和“行为”)模型进行主题分析,以梳理出释放后戒烟的促进因素和障碍。
出狱人员在保持无烟状态方面面临重大障碍。人们在认识到吸烟危害的情况下为吸烟行为辩解(“能力”)、烟草可得性(释放后)、支持吸烟的规范、服务限制(“机会”)、相互竞争的需求和优先事项以及药物和酒精使用(“动机”)之间的相互作用被确定为障碍。相比之下,戒烟的愿望以及其他在个人和他人生活中造成重大损害的“成瘾行为”、在监狱中获得“戒烟”服务以及积极的社会影响被确定为促进因素。基于个人喜好和经历,在监狱中获取电子烟被认为有可能有助于或阻碍释放后的戒烟。
减少出狱人员及其回归社区的人员与烟草相关的危害,将有助于减少健康不平等现象,并支持公共卫生和社会正义工作的其他关键领域。要取得更大成功,需要克服相当大的挑战,包括那些限制监狱和卫生服务机构支持积极行为改变能力的挑战。在当前环境下,加强各服务部门之间的合作以及扩大对适当支持的同伴导师和数字健康干预措施的使用,对于减少一个重点群体与烟草相关的危害可能既有益又可行。