Suppr超能文献

新辅助治疗后机器人手术与腹腔镜手术治疗胃癌的短期疗效:系统评价与Meta分析

Short-term outcomes of robotic vs. laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Tuohuti Tuerjun, Abulizi Kamuran, Li Tao

机构信息

Medical Treatment Center of Gastrointestinal Surgery, People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, No. 91 Tianchi Road, Tianshan District, Xinjiang, 830011, Urumqi, China.

Xinjiang Medical University, No. 91 Tianchi Road, Tianshan District, Xinjiang, 830011, Urumqi, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2025 Jun 5;25(1):1002. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14395-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of robotic gastrectomy (RG) surgery on advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant therapy remains a topic of debate. A thorough search and analysis of the current relevant evidence is needed. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and advantages of RG for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy, comparing it with traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) surgery.

METHODS

We searched databases,including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science,Cochrane Library, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure(CNKI),to identify studies up to May 10, 2025. Four non-randomized controlled trials from East Asia involving neoadjuvant therapy for advanced gastric cancer with RG and LG interventions were included. The outcomes assessed include: postoperative complications, operative time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stays, number of lymph node dissections, the first flatus, the first time on liquid diets, re-admission within 30 days after surgery, reoperation within 30 days after surgery, open conversion, prevalence of serious complications.

RESULTS

A total of four studies enclosed by 569 participants were incorporated into the analysis. The findings reveal that RG significantly extended operative time [mean difference(MD): 82.16,95%CI: 65.39 to 98.94, P < 0.00001, I = 30%] when compared to LG.; However, it significantly reduced the time to the patient's first flatus (MD: -0.60,95%CI:-0.70 to-0.51, P < 0.00001, I = 0%)and the first time on liquid diets[MD:1.33,95%confidence interval(CI):-1.51to-1.16, P < 0.00001, I = 0%], while also increasing the number of lymph nodes(MD: 1.76;95%CI:0.26to3.26, P = 0.02, I = 0%). Furthermore, the findings of this study demonstrate that there were no statistically significant differences between the RG and LG,with postoperative complications [odds ratio, OR: 0.81;95%CI: 0.35-1.87, P = 0.62, I = 65%], blood loss(MD: 2.34;95%CI: -6.43to11.10, P = 0.60, I = 0%), open conversion(OR: 0.66;95%CI: 0.18-2.38, P = 0.52, I = 0%), postoperative hospital stays(MD: -0.29;95%CI:-0.72to0.15, P = 0.19, I = 29%), reoperation within 30 days after surgery(OR: 0.49;95% CI:0.09,2.73, P = 0.42, I = 0%), re-admission within 30 days after surgery(OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.18,1.93, P = 0.38, I = 0%), and prevalence of serious complications(OR = 0.61, 95% CI: (0.29, 1.24), P = 0.17, I = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Based on available data suggests that robotic surgery after neoadjuvant therapy is a treatment approach with great potential for development and may be used as a new treatment method for locally advanced gastric cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025643235 , PROSPERO (42,025,643,235).

摘要

背景

新辅助治疗后机器人胃癌切除术(RG)对进展期胃癌的影响仍是一个有争议的话题。需要对当前相关证据进行全面检索和分析。本研究旨在评估新辅助治疗后RG治疗胃癌的疗效、安全性和优势,并与传统腹腔镜胃癌切除术(LG)进行比较。

方法

我们检索了包括PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆和中国知网(CNKI)在内的数据库,以识别截至2025年5月10日的研究。纳入了四项来自东亚的非随机对照试验,涉及RG和LG干预的进展期胃癌新辅助治疗。评估的结果包括:术后并发症、手术时间、失血量、术后住院时间、淋巴结清扫数量、首次排气时间、首次进流食时间、术后30天内再次入院、术后30天内再次手术、中转开腹、严重并发症发生率。

结果

共有四项研究纳入分析,涉及569名参与者。研究结果显示,与LG相比,RG显著延长了手术时间[平均差(MD):82.16,95%置信区间(CI):65.39至98.94,P<0.00001,I² = 30%];然而,它显著缩短了患者首次排气时间(MD:-0.60,95%CI:-0.70至-0.51,P<0.00001,I² = 0%)和首次进流食时间[MD:-1.33,95%置信区间(CI):-1.51至-1.16,P<0.00001,I² = 0%],同时也增加了淋巴结数量(MD:1.76;95%CI:0.26至3.26,P = 0.02,I² = 0%)。此外,本研究结果表明,RG和LG在术后并发症[比值比,OR:0.81;95%CI:0.35 - 1.87,P = 0.62,I² = 65%]、失血量(MD:2.34;95%CI:-6.43至11.10,P = 0.60,I² = 0%)、中转开腹(OR:0.66;95%CI:0.18 - 2.38,P = 0.52,I² = 0%)、术后住院时间(MD:-0.29;95%CI:-0.72至0.15,P = 0.19,I² = 29%)、术后30天内再次手术(OR:0.49;95%CI:0.09,2.73,P = 0.42,I² = 0%)、术后30天内再次入院(OR:0.59;95%CI:0.18,1.93,P = 0.38,I² = 0%)以及严重并发症发生率(OR = 0.61,95%CI:(0.29,1.24),P = 0.17,I² = 0%)方面无统计学显著差异。

结论

基于现有数据表明,新辅助治疗后的机器人手术是一种具有巨大发展潜力的治疗方法,可作为局部进展期胃癌的一种新治疗手段。

试验注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42025643235 ,PROSPERO(42,025,643,235)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acfc/12139109/7728872fb38a/12885_2025_14395_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验