Hunter Kylie E, Tan Aidan C, Webster Angela C, Hamilton Daniel G, Barnett Adrian, Jones Lee, Cheng Myra, Fahridin Salma, Laguna-Camacho Antonio, Libesman Sol, Hoffmann Mark, Wang Rui, Seidler Anna Lene
NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia.
MetaMelb Research Group University of Melbourne Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023 Nov 3;1(9):e12028. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12028. eCollection 2023 Nov.
Sharing of individual participant data enhances the value of existing data to generate new evidence and inform decision-making. While there is strong in-principle support for data sharing, in practice study data are often difficult to find, access, and re-use. Currently, there is no consensus statement to guide the data-sharing process. In particular, more guidance is needed on the responsibilities of data recipients for re-using individual participant data.
To determine views on the responsibilities of recipients of study data, and to propose how these responsibilities could be met.
A 2-h online focus group was conducted at the 2021 Association for Interdisciplinary Meta-research and Open Science conference. Three example data-sharing scenarios were discussed (evidence synthesis, study reproducibility, and secondary analyses). Notes and audio transcripts were collated using thematic analysis and shared with attendees for further iterative input.
A purposive sample of 16 conference delegates attended the focus group. Analyses revealed four recurring themes that were synthesized into recommendations. The "privacy and ethics" theme described the need for data recipients to prioritize the protection of participant privacy, and the recommendation to proactively share a secure data management plan and evidence of ethical oversight with the data provider. The "capability and resourcing" theme required recipients to demonstrate sufficient capacity to process and analyze study data. The "recognition and collaboration" theme asserted the responsibility to acknowledge the contributions of data providers and invite them to contribute to the secondary project. Last, the "compliance" theme focused on the responsibility to adhere to local data sharing regulations.
Successful data sharing and re-use requires cooperation from multiple stakeholders. We identified the responsibilities of recipients of study data to the individual from whom data arose and the research team who collected the data. Implementation of these in practice could facilitate increased data sharing.
共享个体参与者数据可提升现有数据的价值,以产生新的证据并为决策提供信息。虽然原则上对数据共享有强烈支持,但在实践中,研究数据往往难以查找、获取和再利用。目前,尚无指导数据共享过程的共识声明。特别是,在数据接收者再利用个体参与者数据的责任方面,需要更多指导。
确定对研究数据接收者责任的看法,并提出履行这些责任的方法。
在2021年跨学科元研究与开放科学协会会议上进行了一次为时2小时的在线焦点小组讨论。讨论了三个数据共享示例场景(证据综合、研究可重复性和二次分析)。使用主题分析对笔记和音频记录进行整理,并与参与者分享以获取进一步的迭代意见。
16名会议代表组成的有目的样本参加了焦点小组讨论。分析揭示了四个反复出现的主题,并将其综合为建议。“隐私与伦理”主题描述了数据接收者优先保护参与者隐私的必要性,以及主动与数据提供者分享安全数据管理计划和伦理监督证据的建议。“能力与资源”主题要求接收者展示处理和分析研究数据的足够能力。“认可与合作”主题强调了承认数据提供者的贡献并邀请他们参与二次项目的责任。最后,“合规”主题关注遵守当地数据共享法规的责任。
成功的数据共享和再利用需要多个利益相关者的合作。我们确定了研究数据接收者对数据来源个体和收集数据的研究团队的责任。在实践中实施这些责任可以促进数据共享的增加。