Akagaki Daiki, Shibata Tatsuhiro, Shibao Kodai, Kanaoka Koshiro, Nasu Takahito, Ishii Shunsuke, Kagiyama Nobuyuki, Kida Keisuke, Fujimoto Wataru, Kikuchi Atsushi, Ijichi Takeshi, Fukumoto Yoshihiro, Matsumoto Shingo
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2025 May 10;59:101702. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101702. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Although the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure (MAGGIC) risk score is a validated mortality risk tool in heart failure (HF), its utility in assessing drug-related adverse events (DAEs) associated with sacubitril/valsartan initiation remains unclear. This study evaluated the association between the MAGGIC risk score and DAEs related to sacubitril/valsartan initiation in a Japanese multicenter cohort.
We analyzed 787 patients with HF initiated on sacubitril/valsartan 100 mg/day between August 2020 and August 2021. Patients were stratified into tertiles based on MAGGIC risk scores. The primary outcome was DAEs within 90 days of initiation, defined as hypotension, hyperkalemia, renal events, or angioedema. Secondary outcomes included drug discontinuation and clinical outcomes.
DAEs occurred in 22.7 % patients. Higher MAGGIC risk scores were significantly associated with increased DAEs (adjusted odds ratio [OR] for highest vs. lowest tertile: 2.64, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.66-4.25, p for trend < 0.001) and sacubitril/valsartan discontinuation (21.3 % of patients; adjusted OR for highest vs. lowest tertile: 2.68, 95 % CI: 1.69-4.32, p for trend < 0.001). Time-dependent Cox proportional hazard analyses revealed that the association between DAEs and clinical outcomes varied across the MAGGIC risk score tertiles, with significant interactions between the composite outcome and hospitalization for HF, particularly in lower-risk groups.
The MAGGIC risk score was associated with DAEs risk following sacubitril/valsartan initiation in patients with HF. The impact of DAEs on outcomes varied across risk tertiles, suggesting potential utility for risk stratification and monitoring approaches in HF management.
尽管慢性心力衰竭荟萃分析全球组(MAGGIC)风险评分是一种经过验证的心力衰竭(HF)死亡率风险评估工具,但其在评估与沙库巴曲缬沙坦起始治疗相关的药物相关不良事件(DAEs)方面的效用仍不明确。本研究在日本多中心队列中评估了MAGGIC风险评分与沙库巴曲缬沙坦起始治疗相关的DAEs之间的关联。
我们分析了2020年8月至2021年8月期间开始服用100mg/天沙库巴曲缬沙坦的787例HF患者。根据MAGGIC风险评分将患者分为三分位数。主要结局为起始治疗90天内的DAEs,定义为低血压、高钾血症、肾脏事件或血管性水肿。次要结局包括药物停用和临床结局。
22.7%的患者发生了DAEs。较高的MAGGIC风险评分与DAEs增加(最高三分位数与最低三分位数的调整优势比[OR]:2.64,95%置信区间[CI]:1.66 - 4.25,趋势p<0.001)和沙库巴曲缬沙坦停用(21.3%的患者;最高三分位数与最低三分位数的调整OR:2.68,95%CI:1.69 - 4.32,趋势p<0.001)显著相关。时间依赖性Cox比例风险分析显示,DAEs与临床结局之间的关联在MAGGIC风险评分三分位数之间有所不同,复合结局与HF住院之间存在显著交互作用,尤其是在低风险组。
MAGGIC风险评分与HF患者起始沙库巴曲缬沙坦治疗后的DAEs风险相关。DAEs对结局的影响在不同风险三分位数之间有所不同,提示其在HF管理中的风险分层和监测方法可能具有潜在效用。