Setya Ashwini Kumar
Department of Gastroenterology, Max Super Speciality Hospital, New Delhi, India.
J Dig Endosc. 2020 Mar;11(1):83-86. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1712080. Epub 2020 May 16.
All the three Indian gastroenterology societies (Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy of India, Indian Society of Gastroenterology, and Indian National Association for the Study of the Liver) jointly recommend to consider only emergency and urgent endoscopy procedures for the next 1 month or till the current threat due to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is over. Two laws that are penal in nature are now applicable in the current pandemic, namely the Epidemics Diseases Act 1897 and the Indian Penal Code 1860. No act of an endoscopist should be seen to be in contravention of any of the aforementioned laws, and the sections thereunder as provisions of the Indian Penal Code can be attracted in the current scenario for spreading an infectious disease either knowingly (Section 270) or unknowingly or negligently (Section 269). Section 4 of the Epidemics Disease Act 1897 gives legal protection to every person who has acted under this Act or the directions issued under this Act subject to only one condition, that is, the act must have been done in good faith. Though the hospitals are obliged to ensure personal safety of its staff legally, morally and ethically, because of the huge gap in demand and supply of personal protective equipment (PPE), it is advisable to arrange PPE on one's own to first protect oneself and then, by extension, to prevent the spread to others. The dictum is "take care of yourself." Self-preservation is a supreme law. In the current COVID-19 pandemic conditions, certain additional information, to be agreed upon by the patient, needs to be incorporated in the consent. It should be incorporated in the consent that: • While all the necessary precautions are being taken, there is a finite though small risk that the patient may contract the infection from the hospital. • He/she indemnifies the hospital and the endoscopist against any such liability arising out of any action taken while doing the procedure. • Furthermore, to protect the patient him/herself, he/she agrees to get the preprocedural test for COVID-19 as well as bear the additional cost of the PPE used by the endoscopist and support staff. Several of those who have undergone an endoscopy would require a follow-up consultation. As it is difficult to have physical interaction, teleconsultation may be done as per the telemedicine practice guidelines issued by the Medical Council of India (MCI).
印度的三个胃肠病学学会(印度胃肠内镜学会、印度胃肠病学会和印度肝脏研究全国协会)联合建议,在接下来的1个月内或直至2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)当前的威胁结束之前,仅考虑进行急诊和紧急内镜检查程序。目前,两项具有惩罚性质的法律适用于当前的疫情,即1897年《传染病法》和1860年《印度刑法典》。内镜医师的任何行为都不应被视为违反上述任何一项法律,在当前情况下,《印度刑法典》相关条款可适用于明知(第270条)或不知情或疏忽(第269条)传播传染病的情况。1897年《传染病法》第4条为每一个依据本法或依据本法发布的指示行事的人提供法律保护,但前提是该行为必须是善意的。尽管医院在法律、道德和伦理上有义务确保其工作人员的人身安全,但由于个人防护装备(PPE)供需差距巨大,建议自行准备PPE,首先保护自己,进而防止传播给他人。格言是“照顾好自己”。自我保护是至高无上的法则。在当前COVID-19疫情的情况下,需要在患者同意书中纳入某些经患者同意的额外信息。同意书中应包含:• 在采取所有必要预防措施的同时,患者仍有虽小但有限的风险可能从医院感染。• 他/她免除医院和内镜医师因在操作过程中采取的任何行动而产生的任何此类责任。• 此外,为保护患者自身,他/她同意进行COVID-19术前检测,并承担内镜医师和辅助人员使用的PPE的额外费用。接受过内镜检查的一些人需要进行后续咨询。由于难以进行面对面交流,可根据印度医学委员会(MCI)发布的远程医疗实践指南进行远程咨询。