Distler Werner
Center for Conflict Studies, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Ketzerbach 11, 35032 Marburg, Germany.
Z Friedens Konfliktforsch. 2020;9(2):375-384. doi: 10.1007/s42597-020-00046-w. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
Amidst the arrival of the Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) in Kosovo, the new coalition government of Vetevendosje and the Democratic League of Kosovo (LDK) under the leadership of Prime Minister Kurti (Vetevendosje) collapsed after a vote of no confidence on 25 March 2020. On the surface, the vote, initiated by LDK, was the consequence of a conflict over the appropriate Corona strategy. A two-month power struggle under the extraordinary circumstances of Corona-related restriction followed, resulting in a new LDK-led government in early June. The political crisis in Kosovo in the early-phase of Corona has to be analyzed against the background of a political crisis with legacies in the post-conflict period, the polarization between Vetevendosje and other parties, and the strong influence of external actors in Kosovo. In this forum article, I ask how the discourse on the "state of emergency" and the pandemic has influenced power struggles in Kosovo and how the conflicts have challenged the democratic competition and institutions. My main argument is that the pandemic indeed did not lead to any form of cooperation, but the political competitors used the pandemic for an intensification of their power struggle, which-for now-led to the restoration of a government of established elites, supported by diplomatic interventions from external actors.
在冠状病毒(SARS-CoV-2)抵达科索沃之际,由库尔蒂总理(自决运动)领导的自决运动和科索沃民主党(LDK)新联合政府,在2020年3月25日的不信任投票后垮台。表面上看,由科索沃民主党发起的这次投票,是关于适当的新冠病毒应对策略冲突的结果。随后,在与新冠疫情相关限制的特殊情况下,展开了为期两个月的权力斗争,最终在6月初产生了一个由科索沃民主党领导的新政府。科索沃在新冠疫情初期的政治危机,必须在冲突后遗留政治危机、自决运动与其他政党之间的两极分化以及外部行为体在科索沃的强大影响力这一背景下进行分析。在这篇论坛文章中,我探讨了关于“紧急状态”和疫情的话语如何影响了科索沃的权力斗争,以及这些冲突如何挑战了民主竞争和机构。我的主要观点是,疫情确实没有导致任何形式的合作,而是政治对手利用疫情加剧了他们的权力斗争,目前这导致了一个由既定精英组成的政府的恢复,外部行为体的外交干预对其予以支持。