Carrigan Mark, Jordan Katy
Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Postdigit Sci Educ. 2022;4(2):354-372. doi: 10.1007/s42438-021-00269-x. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
In this paper, we argue that digital platforms play an important role within higher education, not least of all when Covid-19 has made remote working the norm. An increasingly rich field of theoretical and empirical work has helped us understand platforms as socio-technical infrastructures which shape the activity of their users. Their insertion into higher education raises urgent institutional questions which necessitate dispensing with the individualised mode of analysis and instrumentalised conception of technology which often accompany these topics. We outline an alternative approach through a case study of social media in the 2014 Research Excellence Framework, exploring the incorporation of platforms into research evaluation. Our findings suggest social media is invoked differently across disciplinary groupings, as well as platform metrics being cited in a naive and problematic matter. We offer a neo-institutionalist analysis which identifies a tendency towards isomorphism, with perceived 'best practice' being seized upon in response to uncertainty. We suggest such an approach is urgently needed given the role which digital platforms will play in building the post-Pandemic university.
在本文中,我们认为数字平台在高等教育中发挥着重要作用,尤其是在新冠疫情使远程工作成为常态的情况下。日益丰富的理论和实证研究领域帮助我们将平台理解为塑造用户活动的社会技术基础设施。它们融入高等教育引发了紧迫的制度性问题,这就需要摒弃通常伴随这些话题的个体化分析模式和工具化的技术观念。我们通过对2014年卓越研究框架中社交媒体的案例研究概述了一种替代方法,探讨平台在研究评估中的纳入情况。我们的研究结果表明,社交媒体在不同学科分组中的调用方式不同,而且平台指标的引用方式既幼稚又存在问题。我们提供了一种新制度主义分析,该分析确定了一种同构倾向,即人们会采用被视为“最佳实践”的做法来应对不确定性。鉴于数字平台在建设后疫情时代大学中将发挥的作用,我们认为迫切需要这样一种方法。