Suppr超能文献

疫情后大学中的平台与机构:以社交媒体及影响议程为例的研究

Platforms and Institutions in the Post-Pandemic University: a Case Study of Social Media and the Impact Agenda.

作者信息

Carrigan Mark, Jordan Katy

机构信息

Institute of Education, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Faculty of Education, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Postdigit Sci Educ. 2022;4(2):354-372. doi: 10.1007/s42438-021-00269-x. Epub 2021 Nov 4.

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that digital platforms play an important role within higher education, not least of all when Covid-19 has made remote working the norm. An increasingly rich field of theoretical and empirical work has helped us understand platforms as socio-technical infrastructures which shape the activity of their users. Their insertion into higher education raises urgent institutional questions which necessitate dispensing with the individualised mode of analysis and instrumentalised conception of technology which often accompany these topics. We outline an alternative approach through a case study of social media in the 2014 Research Excellence Framework, exploring the incorporation of platforms into research evaluation. Our findings suggest social media is invoked differently across disciplinary groupings, as well as platform metrics being cited in a naive and problematic matter. We offer a neo-institutionalist analysis which identifies a tendency towards isomorphism, with perceived 'best practice' being seized upon in response to uncertainty. We suggest such an approach is urgently needed given the role which digital platforms will play in building the post-Pandemic university.

摘要

在本文中,我们认为数字平台在高等教育中发挥着重要作用,尤其是在新冠疫情使远程工作成为常态的情况下。日益丰富的理论和实证研究领域帮助我们将平台理解为塑造用户活动的社会技术基础设施。它们融入高等教育引发了紧迫的制度性问题,这就需要摒弃通常伴随这些话题的个体化分析模式和工具化的技术观念。我们通过对2014年卓越研究框架中社交媒体的案例研究概述了一种替代方法,探讨平台在研究评估中的纳入情况。我们的研究结果表明,社交媒体在不同学科分组中的调用方式不同,而且平台指标的引用方式既幼稚又存在问题。我们提供了一种新制度主义分析,该分析确定了一种同构倾向,即人们会采用被视为“最佳实践”的做法来应对不确定性。鉴于数字平台在建设后疫情时代大学中将发挥的作用,我们认为迫切需要这样一种方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fab/8566191/e76f06986886/42438_2021_269_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Platforms and Institutions in the Post-Pandemic University: a Case Study of Social Media and the Impact Agenda.
Postdigit Sci Educ. 2022;4(2):354-372. doi: 10.1007/s42438-021-00269-x. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
2
Between alternative and traditional social platforms: the case of gab in exploring the narratives on the pandemic and vaccines.
Front Sociol. 2023 Jul 17;8:1143263. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2023.1143263. eCollection 2023.
4
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Work-life balance Twitter insights: A social media analysis before and after COVID-19 pandemic.
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 22;10(13):e33388. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33388. eCollection 2024 Jul 15.
9
Review of Evaluation Metrics Used in Digital and Traditional Tobacco Control Campaigns.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 11;22(8):e17432. doi: 10.2196/17432.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring scientific impact beyond academia: An assessment of existing impact metrics and proposed improvements.
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 9;12(3):e0173152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173152. eCollection 2017.
3
A new resource for identifying and assessing the impacts of research.
BMC Med. 2015 Jun 24;13:148. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0364-x.
4
Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network.
Nature. 2014 Aug 14;512(7513):126-9. doi: 10.1038/512126a.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验