Gourlay Lesley
University College London Institute of Education, London, UK.
Postdigit Sci Educ. 2022;4(1):57-69. doi: 10.1007/s42438-021-00265-1. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
The literature on space in higher education has arguably been dominated by the concept of 'learning spaces'. In this paper, I will argue that this construct, while appearing student-focused and creative, is ideologically circumscribed by an underlying social constructivism. Following Bayne et al. (2014), I draw on science and technology studies to consider social topologies, in particular regional space, , and their proposed , and the work of Law and colleagues on the category of , derived from Bachelard's (, 1964) disquisition on the nature of fire. I work with this construct in an analysis of postdigital education, in particular looking at synchronous interaction via video conferencing software such as Zoom. Linking this analysis to the work of Goffman and his concept of the lecturer (Goffman in , 1981), I argue that the concept of may allow for a more nuanced and accurate account of the flickering, contingent nature of (co) presence, absence, and alterity, allowing for a more immanent account of digital interaction in 'distance' or 'online' education.
高等教育领域中关于空间的文献可以说一直由“学习空间”这一概念主导。在本文中,我将论证,这种架构虽然看似以学生为中心且富有创造性,但在意识形态上受到潜在社会建构主义的限制。借鉴贝恩等人(2014年)的观点,我运用科学技术研究来考量社会拓扑结构,尤其是区域空间,以及它们所提出的内容,还有劳及其同事源自巴什拉(1964年)关于火的本质论述的“容器”范畴的研究成果。我运用这一架构来分析后数字时代的教育,特别是通过诸如Zoom等视频会议软件进行的同步互动。将这一分析与戈夫曼的作品及其关于授课者的概念(戈夫曼,1981年)相联系,我认为“容器”这一概念或许能更细致入微且准确地描述(共同)在场、缺席和他性的闪烁不定、偶然的本质,从而更内在地阐释“远程”或“在线”教育中的数字互动。