Suppr超能文献

内部打印外包的正颌外科夹板:即时打印的尺寸验证过程。

Printing outsourced orthognathic surgical splints in-house: a dimensional verification process for point-of-care printing.

作者信息

Beidas Talal, Light Luther, Carrico Caroline, Kondor Shayne, Ravi Prasanth, Rabinowitz Yotom A

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

Virginia Commonwealth University School of Dentistry, Richmond, VA, USA.

出版信息

3D Print Med. 2025 Jun 6;11(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s41205-025-00276-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Both outsourcing virtual surgery planning and 3D printed splint fabrication have become the standard in the field of orthognathic surgery. In-house (IH) adaptation of these presurgical operations requires compliance with regulatory bodies when designing and manufacturing medical-grade products. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the dimensional accuracy of IH 3D printed orthognathic surgical splints within a hybrid workflow for externally designed splints.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An in vitro study was conducted utilizing an outsourced (OS) orthognathic surgical splint file from a previously treated patient. The control group included the splint's original standard tessellation language (STL) file. Experimental groups included: splint (a) milled with zirconia, (b) 3D printed on a Phrozen 4 K (commercial printer), (c) 3D printed on Formlabs 3B+ (Formlabs 3B + have track record of having FDA cleared materials and workflows in dental applications and have potential materials that could be used for IH manufacturing for orthognathic splints upon further testing and FDA clearance). Surface area analysis was performed using 3-Matic (Materialise© Mimics Software) to generate root mean square (RMS) values between digital copies of the splints and their corresponding original STL files.

RESULTS

The RMS error in equipment processing and analysis was measured at 0.10 mm. Accounting for this error, the 3D-printed splints exhibited an average RMS of 0.20 mm for both the Formlabs 3B + and the Phrozen 4 K. No statistically significant difference was found between splints from different printers or replicas.

CONCLUSION

This study presents a verification process for providers to verify the geometric stability and reproducibility of their IH-printed orthognathic splints (RMS 0.20 mm). Clinicians may find this study useful when crafting a regulatory-compliant process for the IH manufacturing of OS orthognathic surgery splints.

摘要

背景

外包虚拟手术规划和3D打印夹板制造均已成为正颌外科领域的标准做法。在内部(IH)开展这些术前操作时,在设计和制造医疗级产品时需要遵守监管机构的规定。本研究的目的是评估在外部设计夹板的混合工作流程中,IH 3D打印正颌手术夹板的尺寸精度。

材料与方法

利用一名既往接受治疗患者的外包(OS)正颌手术夹板文件进行了一项体外研究。对照组包括夹板的原始标准镶嵌语言(STL)文件。实验组包括:(a)用氧化锆铣削的夹板,(b)在Phrozen 4K(商用打印机)上3D打印的夹板,(c)在Formlabs 3B+上3D打印的夹板(Formlabs 3B+在牙科应用中拥有经美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的材料和工作流程记录,并且有潜在材料可在进一步测试和获得FDA批准后用于IH制造正颌夹板)。使用3-Matic(Materialise© Mimics软件)进行表面积分析,以生成夹板数字副本与其相应原始STL文件之间的均方根(RMS)值。

结果

设备加工和分析中的RMS误差测量为0.10毫米。考虑到这一误差,Formlabs 3B+和Phrozen 4K的3D打印夹板的平均RMS均为0.20毫米。不同打印机或复制品的夹板之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。

结论

本研究为供应商提供了一个验证过程,以验证其IH打印正颌夹板的几何稳定性和可重复性(RMS为0.20毫米)。临床医生在制定符合法规的OS正颌手术夹板IH制造流程时可能会发现本研究有用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b5ec/12143043/422818590329/41205_2025_276_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验