Brusenbauch Meislová Monika
Department of International Relations and European Studies, Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
Br Politics. 2022 Aug 5:1-21. doi: 10.1057/s41293-022-00214-x.
Between 2016 and 2021, in response to calls for a second Scottish independence referendum, two British Prime Ministers-Theresa May and Boris Johnson-adopted a holding position, at the core of which was the "now-is-not-the-time" argumentative scheme. As a particular expression of strategic ambiguity, this delay discourse was intended to fulfil a specific political function: to postpone the second plebiscite . As such, it marked a stark difference to the 2014 Scottish referendum campaign and provided the anti-independence camp with a new rhetorical resource. Having adopted the general orientation of the Discourse-Historical Approach to discourse analysis, and working with a dataset of May's and Johnson's public utterances on the second Scottish referendum, this article investigates how exactly this discourse of referendum delay was constructed in prime ministerial rhetoric. It concludes that some differences notwithstanding, the two PMs managed to create a largely consistent argumentative scheme.
2016年至2021年间,为回应举行第二次苏格兰独立公投的呼声,英国两位首相——特里萨·梅和鲍里斯·约翰逊——采取了一种维持现状的立场,其核心是“现在不是时候”这一论证策略。作为战略模糊性的一种特殊表现,这种拖延话语旨在实现一项特定的政治功能:推迟第二次公民投票。因此,它与2014年苏格兰公投活动形成了鲜明对比,并为反对独立阵营提供了一种新的修辞资源。本文采用话语历史分析法的总体取向,以梅和约翰逊关于第二次苏格兰公投的公开言论数据集为基础,研究了首相言辞中这种公投延迟话语究竟是如何构建的。研究得出结论,尽管存在一些差异,但两位首相成功构建了一个基本一致的论证策略。