Kreuter Matthew W, Green Melanie C, Cappella Joseph N, Slater Michael D, Wise Meg E, Storey Doug, Clark Eddie M, O'Keefe Daniel J, Erwin Deborah O, Holmes Kathleen, Hinyard Leslie J, Houston Thomas, Woolley Sabra
Health Communication Research Laboratory, School of Public Health, Saint Louis University, 3545 Lafayette Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA.
Ann Behav Med. 2007 Jun;33(3):221-35. doi: 10.1007/BF02879904.
Narrative forms of communication-including entertainment education, journalism, literature, testimonials, and storytelling-are emerging as important tools for cancer prevention and control. To stimulate critical thinking about the role of narrative in cancer communication and promote a more focused and systematic program of research to understand its effects, we propose a typology of narrative application in cancer control. We assert that narrative has four distinctive capabilities: overcoming resistance, facilitating information processing, providing surrogate social connections, and addressing emotional and existential issues. We further assert that different capabilities are applicable to different outcomes across the cancer control continuum (e.g., prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, survivorship). This article describes the empirical evidence and theoretical rationale supporting propositions in the typology, identifies variables likely to moderate narrative effects, raises ethical issues to be addressed when using narrative communication in cancer prevention and control efforts, and discusses potential limitations of using narrative in this way. Future research needs based on these propositions are outlined and encouraged.
叙事性交流形式——包括娱乐教育、新闻报道、文学作品、推荐和讲故事——正逐渐成为癌症预防与控制的重要工具。为激发对叙事在癌症交流中作用的批判性思考,并推动开展更具针对性和系统性的研究项目以了解其效果,我们提出了癌症控制中叙事应用的一种类型划分。我们认为叙事具有四种独特能力:克服抵触情绪、促进信息处理、提供替代性社会联系以及解决情感和生存问题。我们进一步认为,不同能力适用于癌症控制连续过程中的不同结果(例如,预防、检测、诊断、治疗、生存)。本文描述了支持该类型划分中各项主张的实证证据和理论依据,确定了可能调节叙事效果的变量,提出了在癌症预防与控制工作中使用叙事性交流时需解决的伦理问题,并讨论了以这种方式使用叙事的潜在局限性。基于这些主张的未来研究需求也被概述并鼓励开展。