• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Co-creating Knowledge with Robots: System, Synthesis, and Symbiosis.与机器人共同创造知识:系统、综合与共生。
J Knowl Econ. 2022 Feb 14:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s13132-022-00968-1.
2
Safe human-robot collaboration in construction: A conceptual perspective.安全的人机协作在建筑领域:概念视角。
J Safety Res. 2023 Sep;86:39-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jun 16.
3
Development of dialogue system architecture toward co-creating social intelligence when talking with a partner robot.与伙伴机器人对话时共同创造社会智能的对话系统架构的发展。
Front Robot AI. 2022 Oct 17;9:933001. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.933001. eCollection 2022.
4
Designing user-centered policy for social robotics: policy analysis and consultation with the aging and dementia community.设计以用户为中心的社交机器人政策:政策分析与面向老年及痴呆群体的咨询
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Mar 5:1-13. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2025.2471050.
5
Attributing Blame to Robots: I. The Influence of Robot Autonomy.归因于机器人:一、机器人自主性的影响。
Hum Factors. 2021 Jun;63(4):592-602. doi: 10.1177/0018720819880641. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
6
Effects of Prior Robot Experience, Speed, and Proximity on Psychosocial Reactions to a Soft Growing Robot.先前机器人经验、速度和接近度对软生长机器人的社会心理反应的影响。
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2024 Jan-Jun;12(1-2):84-96. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2023.2284193. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
7
Connecting the Dots of Social Robot Design From Interviews With Robot Creators.通过与机器人创造者的访谈梳理社交机器人设计要点
Front Robot AI. 2022 Jun 2;9:720799. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.720799. eCollection 2022.
8
Embodied cognition for autonomous interactive robots.具身认知的自主交互机器人
Top Cogn Sci. 2012 Oct;4(4):759-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01218.x. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
9
Can we talk to robots? Ten-month-old infants expected interactive humanoid robots to be talked to by persons.我们能与机器人交谈吗?10个月大的婴儿期望类人互动机器人能被人与之交谈。
Cognition. 2005 Apr;95(3):B49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.001. Epub 2005 Jan 5.
10
Improving the Social Well-Being of Single Older Adults Using the LOVOT Social Robot: Qualitative Phenomenological Study.利用 LOVOT 社交机器人提高单身老年人的社会幸福感:定性现象学研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Aug 23;11:e56669. doi: 10.2196/56669.

本文引用的文献

1
Neurorobotic fusion of prosthetic touch, kinesthesia, and movement in bionic upper limbs promotes intrinsic brain behaviors.仿生上肢中的假肢触觉、运动觉和运动的神经机器人融合促进了内在大脑行为。
Sci Robot. 2021 Sep 8;6(58):eabf3368. doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.abf3368. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
2
The collaborative mind: intention reading and trust in human-robot interaction.协作思维:人机交互中的意图解读与信任
iScience. 2021 Feb 1;24(2):102130. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102130. eCollection 2021 Feb 19.
3
Relationship Development with Humanoid Social Robots: Applying Interpersonal Theories to Human-Robot Interaction.人形社交机器人的关系发展:将人际关系理论应用于人机交互。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 May;24(5):294-299. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0181. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
4
Biohybrid actuators for robotics: A review of devices actuated by living cells.用于机器人技术的生物杂交致动器:由活细胞驱动的装置综述。
Sci Robot. 2017 Nov 29;2(12). doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aaq0495.
5
Changing Infrastructural Practices: Routine and Reproducibility in Automated Interdisciplinary Bioscience.不断变化的基础设施实践:自动化跨学科生物科学中的常规与可重复性
Sci Technol Human Values. 2020 Nov;45(6):1220-1241. doi: 10.1177/0162243919893757. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
6
The shape of work to come.未来工作的形态。
Nature. 2017 Oct 18;550(7676):316-319. doi: 10.1038/550316a.
7
What makes a robot 'social'?是什么让机器人具有“社会性”?
Soc Stud Sci. 2017 Aug;47(4):556-579. doi: 10.1177/0306312717704722. Epub 2017 May 3.
8
Building machines that learn and think like people.建造像人一样学习和思考的机器。
Behav Brain Sci. 2017 Jan;40:e253. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16001837. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
9
Human-Robot Interaction: Status and Challenges.人机交互:现状与挑战。
Hum Factors. 2016 Jun;58(4):525-32. doi: 10.1177/0018720816644364. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
10
A functionally relevant tool for the body following spinal cord injury.一种与脊髓损伤后身体功能相关的工具。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058312. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

与机器人共同创造知识:系统、综合与共生。

Co-creating Knowledge with Robots: System, Synthesis, and Symbiosis.

作者信息

Hautala Johanna, Jauhiainen Jussi S

机构信息

School of Management, University of Vaasa, 65101 Vaasa, Finland.

Department of Geography and Geology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland.

出版信息

J Knowl Econ. 2022 Feb 14:1-21. doi: 10.1007/s13132-022-00968-1.

DOI:10.1007/s13132-022-00968-1
PMID:40479232
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8852898/
Abstract

In the contemporary robotizing knowledge economy, robots take increasing responsibility for accomplishing knowledge-related tasks that so far have been in the human domain. This profoundly changes the knowledge-creation processes that are at the core of the knowledge economy. Knowledge creation is an interactive spatial process through which ideas are transformed into new and justified outcomes, such as novel knowledge and innovations. However, knowledge-creation processes have rarely been studied in the context of human-robot co-creation. In this article, we take the perspective of key actors who create the future of robotics, namely, robotics-related students and researchers. Their thoughts and actions construct the knowledge co-creation processes that emerge between humans and robots. We ask whether robots can have and create knowledge, what kind of knowledge, and what kind of spatialities connect to interactive human-robot knowledge-creation processes. The article's empirical material consists of interviews with 34 robotics-related researchers and students at universities in Finland and Singapore as well as observations of human-robot interactions there. Robots and humans form top-down systems, interactive syntheses, and integrated symbioses in spatial knowledge co-creation processes. Most interviewees considered that robots can have knowledge. Some perceived robots as machines and passive agents with rational knowledge created in hierarchical systems. Others saw robots as active actors and learning co-workers having constructionist knowledge created in syntheses. Symbioses integrated humans and robots and allowed robots and human-robot cyborgs access to embodied knowledge.

摘要

在当代机器人化的知识经济中,机器人在完成迄今属于人类领域的与知识相关的任务方面承担着越来越多的责任。这深刻地改变了作为知识经济核心的知识创造过程。知识创造是一个交互式的空间过程,通过这个过程,想法被转化为新的、合理的成果,如新知识和创新。然而,知识创造过程在人机共同创造的背景下很少被研究。在本文中,我们从创造机器人未来的关键参与者的角度出发,即与机器人相关的学生和研究人员。他们的思想和行动构建了人机之间出现的知识共同创造过程。我们探讨机器人是否能够拥有和创造知识,拥有何种知识,以及何种空间性与交互式人机知识创造过程相关联。本文的实证材料包括对芬兰和新加坡大学的34名与机器人相关的研究人员和学生的访谈,以及对当地人机交互的观察。在空间知识共同创造过程中,机器人和人类形成了自上而下的系统、交互式综合体和集成共生体。大多数受访者认为机器人能够拥有知识。一些人将机器人视为在层级系统中创造的具有理性知识的机器和被动主体。另一些人则将机器人视为积极的行动者和具有在综合体中创造的建构主义知识的学习型同事。共生体将人类和机器人整合在一起,并使机器人和人机半机械人能够获取具身知识。