• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过虚拟校园中的教学实践对教育质量进行智能分析。

Intelligent analysis of the quality of education through teaching practices on virtual campuses.

作者信息

Alvarez-Blanco Lucia, Castro-Lopez Adrian, Cervero Antonio

机构信息

Department of Educational Sciences, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.

Department of Business Administration, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Psychol Educ. 2022 Nov 10:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10212-022-00649-2.

DOI:10.1007/s10212-022-00649-2
PMID:40479435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9647755/
Abstract

ICTs have been increasingly involved in teaching-learning processes due to the potential offered by the tools as well as to the set of demands derived from the political and health situations of the social environment. In this sense, the introduction of virtual campuses as complex systems that centralize the entire technological component that complements traditional teaching processes has meant a change of paradigm with repercussions at the teaching and pedagogical level. In this context, the purpose of this study aims to analyze students' perception of the use of virtual campus and how to enhance the quality of the educational process using intelligent systems. For this purpose, 318 students that use virtual campus have been surveyed. The results show that there are three variables that predominantly influence the quality of teaching-learning processes using virtual campuses: frequent contact with teachers through the platform, the digital competence of the student, and the adaptation of training content to the students' prior knowledge. This information can be useful, as it allows them to establish guidelines to guide the practices of their teaching teams in technological environments, guaranteeing the suitability of the teaching-learning process and improving the evaluation processes and the assessment of their own educational work.

摘要

由于这些工具所提供的潜力以及社会环境的政治和健康状况所产生的一系列需求,信息通信技术越来越多地参与到教学过程中。从这个意义上说,引入虚拟校园作为集中补充传统教学过程的整个技术组件的复杂系统,意味着教学范式的转变,并在教学和教学法层面产生了影响。在此背景下,本研究旨在分析学生对虚拟校园使用的看法,以及如何利用智能系统提高教育过程的质量。为此,对318名使用虚拟校园的学生进行了调查。结果表明,有三个变量主要影响使用虚拟校园的教学过程质量:通过平台与教师的频繁接触、学生的数字能力以及培训内容与学生先验知识的适配性。这些信息可能会很有用,因为它使他们能够制定指导方针,以指导其教学团队在技术环境中的实践,确保教学过程的适用性,并改进评估过程以及对他们自己教育工作的评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc93/9647755/9fb1130d0c2c/10212_2022_649_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc93/9647755/2d71f3101201/10212_2022_649_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc93/9647755/bed4e7660d79/10212_2022_649_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc93/9647755/c6108c1e15ec/10212_2022_649_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc93/9647755/3b682b16aa48/10212_2022_649_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc93/9647755/9fb1130d0c2c/10212_2022_649_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc93/9647755/2d71f3101201/10212_2022_649_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc93/9647755/bed4e7660d79/10212_2022_649_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc93/9647755/c6108c1e15ec/10212_2022_649_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc93/9647755/3b682b16aa48/10212_2022_649_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bc93/9647755/9fb1130d0c2c/10212_2022_649_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Intelligent analysis of the quality of education through teaching practices on virtual campuses.通过虚拟校园中的教学实践对教育质量进行智能分析。
Eur J Psychol Educ. 2022 Nov 10:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10212-022-00649-2.
2
Evaluation of educational quality performance on virtual campuses using fuzzy inference systems.利用模糊推理系统评估虚拟校园的教育质量绩效。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0232802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232802. eCollection 2020.
3
Towards teaching analytics: a contextual model for analysis of students' evaluation of teaching through text mining and machine learning classification.迈向教学分析:一种通过文本挖掘和机器学习分类来分析学生教学评价的情境模型。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(3):3891-3933. doi: 10.1007/s10639-021-10751-5. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
4
Nursing students' experiences of a pedagogical transition from campus learning to distance learning using digital tools.护理专业学生使用数字工具从校园学习向远程学习进行教学过渡的经历。
BMC Nurs. 2021 Jan 19;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00542-1.
5
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
6
Application of the online teaching model based on BOPPPS virtual simulation platform in preventive medicine undergraduate experiment.基于 BOPPPS 虚拟仿真平台的在线教学模式在预防医学本科实验中的应用。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):1255. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06175-7.
7
[Chances and challenges of increasing digitalization of teaching in the discipline anesthesiology from the perspective of students].从学生视角看麻醉学专业教学日益数字化的机遇与挑战
Anaesthesiologie. 2022 Sep;71(9):689-696. doi: 10.1007/s00101-022-01102-1. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
8
Exploring Educators' Perceptions and Experiences of Online Teaching to Foster Caring Profession Students' Development of Virtual Caring Skills: Sequential Explanatory Mixed Methods Study.探索教育工作者对在线教学的认知与体验,以促进护理专业学生虚拟护理技能的发展:序列解释性混合方法研究
JMIR Nurs. 2025 Jan 15;8:e64548. doi: 10.2196/64548.
9
Lesson learned from assessing teachers' and students' perspectives regarding the quality of e-learning in medical education during the pandemic: a mixed-methods study.从评估教师和学生对大流行期间医学教育中电子学习质量的看法中吸取的教训:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Feb 22;24(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05160-4.
10
Migration of an Escape Room-Style Educational Game to an Online Environment: Design Thinking Methodology.将密室逃脱式教育游戏迁移至在线环境:设计思维方法
JMIR Serious Games. 2022 Sep 26;10(3):e32095. doi: 10.2196/32095.

本文引用的文献

1
Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review.高等教育研究中的数字能力:一项系统的文献综述。
Comput Educ. 2021 Jul;168:104212. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
2
Evaluation of educational quality performance on virtual campuses using fuzzy inference systems.利用模糊推理系统评估虚拟校园的教育质量绩效。
PLoS One. 2020 May 29;15(5):e0232802. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232802. eCollection 2020.
3
Twelve tips for integrating massive open online course content into classroom teaching.
将大规模在线开放课程内容融入课堂教学的 12 个技巧。
Med Teach. 2020 Apr;42(4):393-397. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2019.1571569. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
4
Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Creswell John W Sage 320 £29 0761924426 0761924426 [Formula: see text].研究设计:定性、定量和混合方法研究路径 研究设计:定性、定量和混合方法研究路径 克雷斯韦尔·约翰·W 塞奇出版社 320页 29英镑 0761924426 0761924426 [公式:见正文]
Nurse Res. 2004 Sep 1;12(1):82-83. doi: 10.7748/nr.12.1.82.s2.
5
Comparison of Personal, Social and Academic Variables Related to University Drop-out and Persistence.与大学辍学和坚持学业相关的个人、社会及学术变量比较
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 18;7:1610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01610. eCollection 2016.