• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于推动机器人辅助手术成本效益的综合绩效评分的设计与实施:奥兰多评分

Design and implementation of a composite performance score to drive cost efficiency in robotic-assisted surgery: the Orlando Score.

作者信息

Sanchez Alexis, Teixeira Andre, Ghanem Muhammad, Herrera Luis

机构信息

Orlando Health Advanced Robotic Surgery Program, Orlando, FL, USA.

Orlando Health Weight Loss and Bariatric Surgery Institute, Orlando, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 7;19(1):273. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02436-9.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-025-02436-9
PMID:40481902
Abstract

This study describes and evaluates the implementation of a composite performance score, an integrated metric designed to enhance performance in robotic surgery by focusing on three domains: operational efficiency, cost control, and clinical outcomes. Quarterly feedback meetings to discuss the evaluations based on the score and individualized reports fostered active surgeon engagement in cost-reduction strategies. The project compared two cohorts: an intervention group where surgeons adopted the score and a control group where it was not implemented. Two periods, pre-implementation (Q1 2024) and post-implementation (Q4 2024), were analyzed to assess the financial impact of the score. The findings showed a 7.5% cost reduction per procedure in the intervention group, while the control group experienced an increase in costs. No differences were observed in operative time, length of stay, or readmission rates, confirming that cost optimization did not compromise the quality of care. This approach highlights the value of the composite performance score as a tool for promoting cost-efficient resource management in robotic procedures, demonstrating that with appropriate data, surgeons can effectively participate in initiatives aimed at lowering costs in robotic surgery.

摘要

本研究描述并评估了一种综合绩效评分的实施情况,这是一种综合指标,旨在通过关注三个领域来提高机器人手术的绩效:运营效率、成本控制和临床结果。基于该评分和个性化报告的季度反馈会议促进了外科医生积极参与成本降低策略。该项目比较了两个队列:一个是外科医生采用该评分的干预组,另一个是未实施该评分的对照组。分析了两个时期,即实施前(2024年第一季度)和实施后(2024年第四季度),以评估该评分的财务影响。研究结果显示,干预组每例手术成本降低了7.5%,而对照组成本有所增加。在手术时间、住院时间或再入院率方面未观察到差异,这证实了成本优化并未损害护理质量。这种方法突出了综合绩效评分作为促进机器人手术中成本效益高的资源管理工具的价值,表明通过适当的数据,外科医生可以有效地参与旨在降低机器人手术成本的举措。

相似文献

1
Design and implementation of a composite performance score to drive cost efficiency in robotic-assisted surgery: the Orlando Score.用于推动机器人辅助手术成本效益的综合绩效评分的设计与实施:奥兰多评分
J Robot Surg. 2025 Jun 7;19(1):273. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02436-9.
2
Hospital cost and clinical effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic and open lobectomy: A propensity score-weighted comparison.机器人辅助与电视辅助和开胸肺叶切除术的医院成本和临床效果:倾向评分加权比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May;157(5):2018-2026.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.101. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
3
Cost-effectiveness and clinical impact of robotic-assisted hepatectomy.机器人辅助肝切除术的成本效益和临床影响。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Apr 14;19(1):156. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02319-z.
4
Reducing robotic prostatectomy costs by minimizing instrumentation.通过减少器械使用来降低机器人前列腺切除术的成本。
J Endourol. 2015 May;29(5):556-60. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0533. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
5
Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer.采用机器人辅助子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌5年经验后的成本变化。
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):93-96. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0700-6. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
6
Video-Assisted vs Robotic-Assisted Lung Lobectomies for Operating Room Resource Utilization and Patient Outcomes.电视辅助与机器人辅助肺叶切除术对手术室资源利用及患者预后的影响
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e248881. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8881.
7
Senhance versus da Vinci robotic inguinal hernia repair: a multi-center propensity-weighted study.Senhance与达芬奇机器人腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项多中心倾向加权研究。
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):174. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03364-1.
8
Is robotic mitral valve surgery more expensive than its conventional counterpart?机器人二尖瓣手术比传统手术费用更高吗?
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;20(6):844-7. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv038. Epub 2015 Mar 10.
9
Cost-analysis of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for women with endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术治疗子宫内膜癌和非典型复杂性增生女性的成本分析
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Mar;95(3):299-308. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12820. Epub 2015 Dec 16.
10
Cost-effectiveness of robotic hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in early endometrial cancer.机器人辅助子宫切除术与传统开腹子宫切除术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的成本效益比较。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Nov;30(11):1719-1725. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001611. Epub 2020 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The death of laparoscopy.腹腔镜的消亡。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2677-2688. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10774-2. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
2
American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery 2022 estimate of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States.美国代谢与减重外科学会 2022 年美国代谢与减重手术实施预估。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024 May;20(5):425-431. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.01.012. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
Cost Saving in the Operating Room: Scoping Review of Surgical Scorecards.
J Am Coll Surg. 2023 Dec 1;237(6):912-922. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000000846. Epub 2023 Oct 3.
4
Improving efficiency and reducing costs in robotic surgery: a Lean Six Sigma approach to optimize turnover time.提高机器人手术效率和降低成本:精益六西格玛方法优化周转时间。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Oct;17(5):2059-2064. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01606-x. Epub 2023 May 16.
5
Development of a robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) program. Lessons learned after 2500 cases.机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS)项目的开展。2500例手术后的经验教训。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):405-411. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01430-9. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
6
A Surgeon Scorecard Is Associated with Improved Value in Elective Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.外科医生评分卡与择期初次髋关节和膝关节置换术的价值改善相关。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jan 16;101(2):152-159. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01553.
7
Association Between Surgeon Scorecard Use and Operating Room Costs.外科医生评分卡使用与手术室成本之间的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2017 Mar 1;152(3):284-291. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4674.
8
A Model of Cost Reduction and Standardization: Improved Cost Savings While Maintaining the Quality of Care.成本降低与标准化模型:在保持医疗质量的同时提高成本节约效果。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Nov;58(11):1104-7. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000463.
9
Patient satisfaction and quality of surgical care in US hospitals.美国医院患者的满意度与外科护理质量
Ann Surg. 2015 Jan;261(1):2-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000765.
10
Survey finds few orthopedic surgeons know the costs of the devices they implant.调查发现,很少有骨科医生了解他们植入设备的成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jan;33(1):103-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0453.