Hu Feng, Cao Yingui, Zhang Changchun, Yan Zixun, Zhang Danfeng, He Jinxin
School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China.
School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China; Institute of Natural & Culture, China University of Geosciences Beijing, Beijing, 100083, China; Observation and Research Station of Land Reclamation in Loess Plateau Mining Area, Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China, Beijing, 100035, China.
J Environ Manage. 2025 Aug;389:125991. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125991. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
The delineation of ecological conservation priority areas (ECPA) emphasizes cost-effectiveness in planning and management, optimizing resource allocation to maximize the stable supply of ecosystem services (ES). Mountain regions are crucial foundations for maintaining ecological security and represent areas of high ecological value. However, they exhibit prominent ecological vulnerability and sensitivity, necessitating strengthened ecological protection to address impacts from human activities and environmental changes. This study employs the Taihang Mountains in China as a case study to develop a hierarchical identification framework for ECPA based on ES and their trade-off and synergy relationships. The framework identifies ECPA from the perspectives of conservation scale and conservation objectives, based on systematic assessment and analysis of spatiotemporal patterns and change characteristics of ES and their interrelations. Our findings indicate that from 2000 to 2020, the ES in the Taihang Mountains underwent notable periodic changes, primarily exhibiting a declining trend. Water conservation (WC) increased by 2.93 × 10 m, while soil retention (SR) and carbon storage (CS) decreased by 2.85 × 10t and 1.10 × 10t, respectively. Habitat quality (HQ) declined by 0.03, and landscape aesthetics (LA) remained relatively stable with only a 0.01 increase. High-value areas for WC and SR services occupy a small proportion and are concentrated in the central region. In contrast, high-value areas for CS, HQ, and LA services were widely distributed, extending from north to south throughout the entire region. ES exhibited distinct gradient characteristics, with increasing elevation influencing these services' supply and fluctuation intensity. The trade-off and synergy relationships among ES remained stable and were predominantly characterized by significant synergistic relationships. High-high synergy areas exhibited strong spatial dependence, were concentrated in high-elevation regions, and showed an upward trend. The spatial coherence of ECPA from the perspectives of conservation objectives and scales was relatively high. As conservation objectives and scales expanded, marginal protection efficiency gradually decreased, though it remained above 1.5. Integrating conservation scales and objectives could cover an area of 19,571.33 km in the Taihang Mountains, ultimately achieving a minimum of 19.54 % for individual ES and 22.90 % for comprehensive ES. This study suggests that leveraging nature reserves can facilitate the practical implementation of ECPA, providing a framework for decision-making processes concerning ecological protection and ES management in mountainous regions.
生态保护优先区域(ECPA)的划定强调规划和管理中的成本效益,优化资源配置以最大限度地稳定提供生态系统服务(ES)。山区是维护生态安全的关键基础,具有很高的生态价值。然而,它们表现出显著的生态脆弱性和敏感性,需要加强生态保护以应对人类活动和环境变化的影响。本研究以中国太行山为例,基于生态系统服务及其权衡与协同关系,构建了一个ECPA的分层识别框架。该框架基于对生态系统服务的时空格局、变化特征及其相互关系的系统评估和分析,从保护尺度和保护目标的角度识别ECPA。我们的研究结果表明,2000年至2020年期间,太行山的生态系统服务经历了显著的周期性变化,主要呈下降趋势。水源涵养量(WC)增加了2.93×10米,而土壤保持量(SR)和碳储量(CS)分别减少了2.85×10吨和1.10×10吨。栖息地质量(HQ)下降了0.03,景观美学(LA)相对稳定,仅增加了0.01。水源涵养和土壤保持服务的高价值区域占比小,集中在中部地区。相比之下,碳储量、栖息地质量和景观美学服务的高价值区域分布广泛,从北到南贯穿整个区域。生态系统服务呈现出明显的梯度特征,海拔升高影响这些服务的供给和波动强度。生态系统服务之间的权衡与协同关系保持稳定,主要以显著的协同关系为特征。高高协同区域表现出很强的空间依赖性,集中在高海拔地区,并呈上升趋势。从保护目标和尺度的角度来看,ECPA的空间一致性相对较高。随着保护目标和尺度的扩大,边际保护效率逐渐降低,但仍高于1.5。整合保护尺度和目标可以覆盖太行山19571.33平方公里的面积,最终实现单项生态系统服务的最低覆盖率为19.54%,综合生态系统服务的最低覆盖率为22.90%。本研究表明,利用自然保护区可以促进ECPA的实际实施,为山区生态保护和生态系统服务管理的决策过程提供一个框架。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2025-6
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2025-6
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2025-6-8
Health Technol Assess. 2001
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2025-6
Environ Monit Assess. 2025-6-19