Yu Xuan-Zi, Li Jiu-Lin, Chu Jin-Long
School of Architecture and Planning, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230022, China.
Anhui Collaborative Innovation Center for Urbanization Construction, Hefei 230022, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2025 Jun;36(6):1616-1626. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202506.026.
Clarifying the spatial layout of ecological functional zones and the evolution patterns of trade-offs and synergies among multiple ecosystem services is helpful to formulate region-specific management strategies and is fundamentally important for scientific ecosystem management and sustainable development. We analyzed the spatiotemporal variations of six ecosystem services (ES) in Anhui Province from 1990 to 2020, including biodiversity maintenance, water yield, habitat quality, carbon storage, food supply, and soil retention. The multiple ecosystem service landscape index was used to assess comprehensive ecosystem service capacity. The self-organizing mapping algorithm was used to identify ecosystem service bundles. We conducted ecological functional zoning and investigated the trade-off and synergy among ES at both regional scale and within different service bundles. The results showed that during 1990-2020, construction land and forest exhibited increasing trends, increased by 121.8% and 1.2% respectively, while cropland, grassland, water, and unused land all decreased. Habitat quality and carbon storage showed decreasing trends, while the other four ESs exhibited overall increasing trend. Food supply displayed a pattern of low in the south and high in the north, whereas all other ESs showed a pattern of high in the south and low in the north. Based on the identified ecosystem service bundles, the study area was classified into three functional zones. The grain production area accounted for the largest proportion, while the ecological conservation area and the ecological transition area maintained roughly equal proportions. The ecological transition zone expanded faster than the ecological conservation zone. At the regional scale, there were trade-offs between food supply and other ESs, while there were synergies in the remaining five ESs. Due to the influences from human activities, land use types and climate change, the trade-off and synergy relationships among ESs within different service bundles exhibited varying degrees of heterogeneity compared to those at the regional scale.
明确生态功能区的空间布局以及多种生态系统服务之间权衡与协同的演变模式,有助于制定因地制宜的管理策略,对生态系统的科学管理和可持续发展至关重要。我们分析了1990年至2020年安徽省六种生态系统服务(ES)的时空变化,包括生物多样性维持、产水量、栖息地质量、碳储存、食物供应和土壤保持。采用多生态系统服务景观指数评估综合生态系统服务能力。利用自组织映射算法识别生态系统服务束。我们进行了生态功能分区,并研究了区域尺度和不同服务束内生态系统服务之间的权衡与协同。结果表明,1990 - 2020年期间,建设用地和林地呈增加趋势,分别增加了121.8%和1.2%,而耕地、草地、水域和未利用地均减少。栖息地质量和碳储存呈下降趋势,而其他四种生态系统服务总体呈上升趋势。食物供应呈现南低北高的格局,而其他所有生态系统服务均呈现南高北低的格局。基于识别出的生态系统服务束,研究区域被划分为三个功能区。粮食生产区占比最大,而生态保护区和生态过渡区比例大致相当。生态过渡区的扩张速度快于生态保护区。在区域尺度上,食物供应与其他生态系统服务之间存在权衡,而其余五种生态系统服务之间存在协同。由于人类活动、土地利用类型和气候变化的影响,不同服务束内生态系统服务之间的权衡与协同关系与区域尺度相比呈现出不同程度的异质性。