Suppr超能文献

中等覆盖度基因组测序与单核苷酸多态性阵列技术在识别染色体异常以推进产前和产后诊断方面的比较研究

A Comparative Study of Medium-Coverage Genome Sequencing and SNP Array Technology in Identifying Chromosomal Abnormalities to Advance Prenatal and Postnatal Diagnosis.

作者信息

Pang Jialun, Zhou Lin, Hu Jiancheng, Kuang Hanzhe, Xi Hui, Ma Na, Yang Shuting, Yu Wenxian, Zhang Yanan, Zhang Qian, Zhang Victor Wei, Chen Jing, Peng Ying

机构信息

Department of Medical Genetics, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, China.

AmCare Genomics Lab, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Mol Diagn. 2025 Aug;27(8):736-746. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.04.009. Epub 2025 Jun 6.

Abstract

This study compared the performance of 5-fold genome sequencing (GS) with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array technology in detecting chromosomal abnormalities, particularly in the context of prenatal and postnatal diagnostics. A total of 42 samples, previously analyzed by SNP array, were re-examined using 5-fold GS to evaluate the detection of clinically significant copy number variations (CNVs), mosaicism, and absence of heterozygosity (AOH). The results revealed a 100% concordance between the two methods for the identification of clinically relevant CNVs, with both technologies detecting similar CNV size ranges. However, 5-fold GS demonstrated better precision in defining CNV breakpoints and exhibited a lower false-positive rate, as confirmed by quantitative PCR validation. Additionally, 5-fold GS detected mosaicism with comparable sensitivity to SNP array, capturing mosaic levels as low as 17%, whereas SNP array identified levels between 15% and 84%. For AOH detection, 5-fold GS identified all candidate AOH regions with a slightly better sensitivity, achieving a detection size limit of 4.8 Mb compared with SNP array's 5.08 Mb. Overall, 5-fold GS shows potential as a reliable method for chromosomal abnormality detection, offering high accuracy and clinical utility in both prenatal and postnatal genetic testing.

摘要

本研究比较了五倍体基因组测序(GS)与单核苷酸多态性(SNP)阵列技术在检测染色体异常方面的性能,特别是在产前和产后诊断的背景下。总共42个先前通过SNP阵列分析的样本,使用五倍体GS重新检测,以评估临床显著拷贝数变异(CNV)、嵌合体和杂合性缺失(AOH)的检测情况。结果显示,两种方法在识别临床相关CNV方面的一致性为100%,两种技术检测到的CNV大小范围相似。然而,五倍体GS在定义CNV断点方面表现出更高的精度,并且假阳性率更低,这通过定量PCR验证得到了证实。此外,五倍体GS检测嵌合体的灵敏度与SNP阵列相当,能够捕获低至17%的嵌合水平,而SNP阵列识别的水平在15%至84%之间。对于AOH检测,五倍体GS识别出所有候选AOH区域,灵敏度略高,检测大小极限为4.8 Mb,而SNP阵列的为5.08 Mb。总体而言,五倍体GS显示出作为一种可靠的染色体异常检测方法的潜力,在产前和产后基因检测中具有高准确性和临床实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验