• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中等覆盖度基因组测序与单核苷酸多态性阵列技术在识别染色体异常以推进产前和产后诊断方面的比较研究

A Comparative Study of Medium-Coverage Genome Sequencing and SNP Array Technology in Identifying Chromosomal Abnormalities to Advance Prenatal and Postnatal Diagnosis.

作者信息

Pang Jialun, Zhou Lin, Hu Jiancheng, Kuang Hanzhe, Xi Hui, Ma Na, Yang Shuting, Yu Wenxian, Zhang Yanan, Zhang Qian, Zhang Victor Wei, Chen Jing, Peng Ying

机构信息

Department of Medical Genetics, Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Changsha, China.

AmCare Genomics Lab, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Mol Diagn. 2025 Aug;27(8):736-746. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.04.009. Epub 2025 Jun 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.04.009
PMID:40482883
Abstract

This study compared the performance of 5-fold genome sequencing (GS) with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array technology in detecting chromosomal abnormalities, particularly in the context of prenatal and postnatal diagnostics. A total of 42 samples, previously analyzed by SNP array, were re-examined using 5-fold GS to evaluate the detection of clinically significant copy number variations (CNVs), mosaicism, and absence of heterozygosity (AOH). The results revealed a 100% concordance between the two methods for the identification of clinically relevant CNVs, with both technologies detecting similar CNV size ranges. However, 5-fold GS demonstrated better precision in defining CNV breakpoints and exhibited a lower false-positive rate, as confirmed by quantitative PCR validation. Additionally, 5-fold GS detected mosaicism with comparable sensitivity to SNP array, capturing mosaic levels as low as 17%, whereas SNP array identified levels between 15% and 84%. For AOH detection, 5-fold GS identified all candidate AOH regions with a slightly better sensitivity, achieving a detection size limit of 4.8 Mb compared with SNP array's 5.08 Mb. Overall, 5-fold GS shows potential as a reliable method for chromosomal abnormality detection, offering high accuracy and clinical utility in both prenatal and postnatal genetic testing.

摘要

本研究比较了五倍体基因组测序(GS)与单核苷酸多态性(SNP)阵列技术在检测染色体异常方面的性能,特别是在产前和产后诊断的背景下。总共42个先前通过SNP阵列分析的样本,使用五倍体GS重新检测,以评估临床显著拷贝数变异(CNV)、嵌合体和杂合性缺失(AOH)的检测情况。结果显示,两种方法在识别临床相关CNV方面的一致性为100%,两种技术检测到的CNV大小范围相似。然而,五倍体GS在定义CNV断点方面表现出更高的精度,并且假阳性率更低,这通过定量PCR验证得到了证实。此外,五倍体GS检测嵌合体的灵敏度与SNP阵列相当,能够捕获低至17%的嵌合水平,而SNP阵列识别的水平在15%至84%之间。对于AOH检测,五倍体GS识别出所有候选AOH区域,灵敏度略高,检测大小极限为4.8 Mb,而SNP阵列的为5.08 Mb。总体而言,五倍体GS显示出作为一种可靠的染色体异常检测方法的潜力,在产前和产后基因检测中具有高准确性和临床实用性。

相似文献

1
A Comparative Study of Medium-Coverage Genome Sequencing and SNP Array Technology in Identifying Chromosomal Abnormalities to Advance Prenatal and Postnatal Diagnosis.中等覆盖度基因组测序与单核苷酸多态性阵列技术在识别染色体异常以推进产前和产后诊断方面的比较研究
J Mol Diagn. 2025 Aug;27(8):736-746. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2025.04.009. Epub 2025 Jun 6.
2
Genomics-based non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy in pregnant women.基于基因组学的非侵入性产前检测用于检测孕妇胎儿染色体非整倍体。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 10;11(11):CD011767. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011767.pub2.
3
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
4
A Prospective Evaluation of the Diagnostic Utility for Low-Coverage Genome Sequencing in Prenatal Samples: A Comparison With Chromosomal Microarray Analysis.产前样本低覆盖度基因组测序诊断效用的前瞻性评估:与染色体微阵列分析的比较
Prenat Diagn. 2025 Jul 4. doi: 10.1002/pd.6840.
5
Current quantitative methodologies for preimplantation genetic testing frequently misclassify meiotic aneuploidies as mosaic.目前用于植入前基因检测的定量方法常常将减数分裂非整倍体误分类为嵌合体。
Fertil Steril. 2025 Feb 15. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2025.02.018.
6
High-resolution Chromosomal Microarray with Diagnostic Potential for Detecting Exon-level Copy Number Variations Using Targeted and Non-targeted Approaches.具有诊断潜力的高分辨率染色体微阵列,采用靶向和非靶向方法检测外显子水平的拷贝数变异
Ann Lab Med. 2025 Jul 30. doi: 10.3343/alm.2025.0123.
7
[Prenatal diagnosis and analysis of fetuses with false-positive NIPT results caused by sex chromosomal abnormalities in pregnant women].[孕妇性染色体异常导致无创产前基因检测结果假阳性胎儿的产前诊断与分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2025 May 10;42(5):525-531. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn511374-20250127-00053.
8
Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 常规核型分析技术之外的阵列比较基因组杂交技术在产前诊断中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jan;37(1):6-14. doi: 10.1002/uog.7754.
9
Frequency of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in pregnancies without increased risk for structural chromosomal aberrations: systematic review and meta-analysis.亚显微染色体异常在无结构染色体异常高风险妊娠中的频率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):445-452. doi: 10.1002/uog.17533.
10
Detection and Genetic Analysis of Small Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes in Prenatal Diagnosis.产前诊断中微小超数标记染色体的检测与基因分析
Cytogenet Genome Res. 2025;165(2):70-84. doi: 10.1159/000546051. Epub 2025 Apr 29.