• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚显微染色体异常在无结构染色体异常高风险妊娠中的频率:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Frequency of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in pregnancies without increased risk for structural chromosomal aberrations: systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):445-452. doi: 10.1002/uog.17533.

DOI:10.1002/uog.17533
PMID:28556491
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish, based on a systematic literature review, the frequency of pathogenic submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in fetuses that are not at increased risk for unbalanced structural chromosomal aberrations, with the aim of determining whether high-resolution testing for submicroscopic aberrations is beneficial in a general pregnant population.

METHODS

EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science and CENTRAL databases were searched systematically on 3 June 2016 for all relevant articles on the prevalence of pathogenic submicroscopic copy number variants (CNVs) in fetuses referred for prenatal invasive testing because of advanced maternal age (AMA) or parental anxiety (ANX). Relevant full-text articles were analyzed and the prevalence of submicroscopic CNVs was calculated based on the extracted data. Meta-analysis was conducted in a pooled cohort of 10 614 fetuses based on the 10 largest studies (n > 300) of a total of 19 that were relevant.

RESULTS

Pooled estimate analysis indicated that 0.84% (95% CI, 0.55-1.30%) of fetuses that had invasive testing because of AMA/ANX carried a pathogenic clinically significant submicroscopic aberration. The onset/penetrance of submicroscopic findings was studied in 10 314 fetuses reported in eight papers that presented aberrant cases with all necessary details to allow assessment of the findings. The pooled estimates resulting from meta-analysis of the data indicated that an early-onset syndromic disorder was detected in 0.37% (95% CI, 0.27-0.52%) of cases, a susceptibility CNV was found in 0.30% (95% CI, 0.14-0.67%) and late-onset diseases were reported in 0.11% (95% CI, 0.05%-0.21%). The prevalence of early-onset syndromic disorders caused by a submicroscopic aberration was calculated to be 1:270. When the risk for submicroscopic aberrations is added to the individual risk for microscopic chromosomal aberrations, all pregnant women have a risk of higher than 1 in 180 for a relevant chromosomal aberration, and pregnant women under 36 years of age have a higher risk for submicroscopic pathogenic aberrations than for Down syndrome.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review shows that a significant proportion of fetuses in a general pregnant population carry a submicroscopic pathogenic CNV. Based on these figures, all women should be informed on their individual risk for all pathogenic chromosomal aberrations and not only for common trisomies. Copyright © 2017 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

摘要

目的

通过系统文献回顾,确定非高危结构染色体异常胎儿的亚微观致病性染色体畸变的频率,以确定在一般孕妇人群中进行亚微观畸变的高分辨率检测是否有益。

方法

于 2016 年 6 月 3 日,检索 EMBASE、PubMed、Web of Science 和 CENTRAL 数据库,以获取所有关于因高龄产妇(AMA)或父母焦虑(ANX)而接受产前有创性检测的胎儿亚微观拷贝数变异(CNV)致病性的相关文章。分析相关的全文文章,并根据提取的数据计算亚微观 CNV 的患病率。对 19 项相关研究中的 10 项最大研究(n > 300)进行了基于 10614 例胎儿的汇总队列荟萃分析。

结果

汇总估计分析表明,因 AMA/ANX 接受有创性检测的胎儿中有 0.84%(95%CI,0.55-1.30%)携带致病性临床显著的亚微观异常。在 8 篇文章中报道了 10314 例存在亚微观发现的胎儿的起始/外显率研究,这些文章提供了所有必要的详细信息,以便评估这些发现。对数据进行荟萃分析的汇总估计表明,在 0.37%(95%CI,0.27-0.52%)的病例中检测到早发性综合征障碍,在 0.30%(95%CI,0.14-0.67%)中发现易感性 CNV,在 0.11%(95%CI,0.05%-0.21%)中报告了迟发性疾病。亚微观异常引起的早发性综合征疾病的患病率计算为 1:270。当将亚微观异常的风险添加到微观染色体异常的个体风险中时,所有孕妇发生相关染色体异常的风险均高于 1:180,而 36 岁以下孕妇的亚微观致病性异常风险高于唐氏综合征。

结论

本系统综述表明,一般孕妇人群中相当一部分胎儿携带亚微观致病性 CNV。根据这些数据,应告知所有女性其所有致病性染色体异常的个体风险,而不仅仅是常见的三体。版权所有©2017 ISUOG。由 John Wiley & Sons Ltd 出版。

相似文献

1
Frequency of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in pregnancies without increased risk for structural chromosomal aberrations: systematic review and meta-analysis.亚显微染色体异常在无结构染色体异常高风险妊娠中的频率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Apr;51(4):445-452. doi: 10.1002/uog.17533.
2
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
5
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块型银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 23;5(5):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub5.
9
Diagnostic test accuracy and cost-effectiveness of tests for codeletion of chromosomal arms 1p and 19q in people with glioma.染色体臂 1p 和 19q 缺失的检测在胶质瘤患者中的诊断准确性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 2;3(3):CD013387. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013387.pub2.
10
Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis.糖皮质激素性骨质疏松症:一项系统评价与成本效用分析
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Mar;11(7):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-231. doi: 10.3310/hta11070.

引用本文的文献

1
Counseling prior to cfDNA screening: are we giving the right numbers?cfDNA筛查前的咨询:我们提供的数字正确吗?
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08108-1.
2
Prenatal diagnosis following preimplantation genetic testing (PGT): recommendations of the Italian Society of Human Genetics (SIGU).植入前基因检测(PGT)后的产前诊断:意大利人类遗传学会(SIGU)的建议
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2025 Mar;42(3):1015-1024. doi: 10.1007/s10815-024-03358-5. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
3
Clinical application of chromosome microarray analysis and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis in Northwest China.
染色体微阵列分析和核型分析在中国西北地区产前诊断中的临床应用
Front Genet. 2024 Nov 6;15:1347942. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1347942. eCollection 2024.
4
Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) Results among Patients Referred to Invasive Prenatal Testing after First-Trimester Screening: A Comprehensive Cohort Study.孕早期筛查后转诊至侵入性产前检测患者的阵列比较基因组杂交(aCGH)结果:一项综合队列研究。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Sep 30;14(19):2186. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14192186.
5
Is intermediate risk really intermediate? Comparison of karyotype and non-invasive prenatal testing results of pregnancies at intermediate risk of trisomy 21 on maternal serum screening.中度风险真的是中度吗?对孕中期血清筛查中21三体中度风险妊娠的核型与无创产前检测结果的比较。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Apr;34(2):e1973. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1973. Epub 2024 Oct 4.
6
Comparative analysis of the application with the combination of CMA and karyotype in routine and late amniocentesis.常规和晚期羊膜穿刺术应用 CMA 与核型分析联合的对比分析。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;310(3):1555-1562. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07602-2. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
7
Is Nuchal Translucency of 3.0-3.4 mm an Indication for cfDNA Testing or Microarray? - A Multicenter Retrospective Clinical Cohort Study.颈项透明层厚度为 3.0-3.4 毫米是否需要进行 cfDNA 检测或微阵列检测?——一项多中心回顾性临床队列研究。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2024;51(5):453-462. doi: 10.1159/000539463. Epub 2024 May 31.
8
Prenatal Exome Sequencing Analysis in Fetuses with Various Ultrasound Findings.具有各种超声检查结果的胎儿的产前外显子组测序分析
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 28;13(1):181. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010181.
9
Comparison of Chromosomal Microarray Analysis and Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Pregnant Women with Fetal Ultrasonic Soft Markers.胎儿超声软指标孕妇中染色体微阵列分析与无创产前检测的比较
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2024 Jan 4;17:29-40. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S437441. eCollection 2024.
10
A decade of change - lessons learned from prenatal diagnostics in Central Denmark region in 2008-2018.一个十年的变革——2008-2018 年丹麦中部地区产前诊断的经验教训。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 Nov;102(11):1505-1510. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14631. Epub 2023 Jul 21.