Suppr超能文献

瑞典急诊科即时检验血液分析系统的可及性、使用情况及临床影响全国性调查。

National survey on availability, use and clinical impact of point-of-care blood analysis systems in Swedish emergency departments.

作者信息

Jörg Matthias, Lundgren Tim, Wretborn Jens, Wilhelms Daniel B

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Sundsvall Regional Hospital, Region Västernorrland, Sweden.

Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, 58185, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 7;25(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01251-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Expedited diagnostic results are important in time sensitive operations like the Emergency Department (ED). Point-of-care testing (POCT) is used for a broad range of blood tests reducing wait times and providing faster decisions on patient management compared to central laboratory analysis. If POCT is to substitute central laboratory analysis as part of the decision making process in the ED, cognizance on the distribution and availability of the required instruments, staff training and workflow integration is essential. The aim of this study was to determine the accessibility of POCT, with particular emphasis on blood gas analysis, in all Swedish EDs and to describe its incorporation into workflow.

METHODS

This was an exploratory survey study conducted in 2024 using a digital questionnaire focusing on POCT availability, perceived reliability, sampling, analysis and workflow integration. Descriptive data is reported as percentage, mean with standard deviation. Qualitative data in open-ended questions was analyzed in a descriptive manner and systematically summarized.

RESULTS

All Swedish EDs (n = 71) responded to our survey. All EDs utilized some kind of POCT with the most prevalent being blood gas, Hb, glucose and CRP. 75% of all EDs had at least one blood gas instrument on site. 44% had guidelines to define indication and usage, 67% replaced certain central laboratory analyses in favor of POCT. ED staff assessed the reliability of results of POCT blood gas analysis as 8 on a 1-10 likert scale (SD 1). All EDs provided staff training on sampling and analysis, but only 30% of EDs had repeated training sessions to avoid misoperation and preanalytical errors. In 32% of reporting EDs, POCT blood gas analysis was performed on more than 30% of patients, mainly triggered by standard operating procedures.

CONCLUSION

All Swedish EDs utilized basic POCT to accelerate patient flow. The majority of Swedish EDs have access to POCT blood gas analysis, the replacement of central laboratory analyses was common. Perceived reliability of POCT blood gas analysis results was considered high, despite the fact that staff training varied substantially. The overall utilization of other POCT remains low - that despite good evidence for cost-effectiveness, reliability and shortened length of stay.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

摘要

背景

在急诊科(ED)等对时间敏感的操作中,快速诊断结果至关重要。即时检验(POCT)用于广泛的血液检测,与中心实验室分析相比,可减少等待时间并为患者管理提供更快的决策。如果POCT要替代中心实验室分析作为急诊科决策过程的一部分,了解所需仪器的分布和可用性、工作人员培训以及工作流程整合至关重要。本研究的目的是确定所有瑞典急诊科中POCT的可及性,特别强调血气分析,并描述其纳入工作流程的情况。

方法

这是一项于2024年进行的探索性调查研究,使用数字问卷重点关注POCT的可用性、感知可靠性、采样、分析和工作流程整合。描述性数据以百分比、均值和标准差的形式报告。对开放式问题中的定性数据进行描述性分析并系统总结。

结果

所有瑞典急诊科(n = 71)回复了我们的调查。所有急诊科都使用了某种POCT,最常见的是血气分析、血红蛋白、血糖和C反应蛋白检测。75%的急诊科现场至少有一台血气分析仪。44%的急诊科有定义检测指征和使用方法的指南,67%的急诊科用POCT替代了某些中心实验室分析。急诊科工作人员将POCT血气分析结果的可靠性在1 - 10李克特量表上评为8分(标准差为1)。所有急诊科都为工作人员提供了采样和分析方面的培训,但只有30%的急诊科有重复培训课程以避免操作失误和分析前误差。在32%报告的急诊科中,超过30%的患者接受了POCT血气分析,主要由标准操作流程触发。

结论

所有瑞典急诊科都使用基本的POCT来加快患者流程。大多数瑞典急诊科可以进行POCT血气分析,中心实验室分析的替代很常见。尽管工作人员培训差异很大,但POCT血气分析结果的感知可靠性被认为很高。其他POCT的总体利用率仍然很低——尽管有充分证据表明其具有成本效益、可靠性和缩短住院时间的优势。

试验注册

临床试验编号:不适用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5fcd/12145587/34b39d4d5a00/12873_2025_1251_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验