• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于患有影响性发育疾病的幼小男孩的家长报告结局指标(PRO-CSD)的验证。

Validation of a parent-reported outcome measure for young boys with a condition affecting sex development (PRO-CSD).

作者信息

Tseretopoulou Xanthippi, Ali Salma R, Gardner Melissa, Flett Martyn, Lee Boma, O'Toole Stuart, Steven Mairi, Sandberg David E, Ahmed S Faisal

机构信息

Developmental Endocrinology Research Group, Royal Hospital for Children, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

Office for Rare Conditions, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2025 Jun 8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-328377.

DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2024-328377
PMID:40484452
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12404183/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To validate a short parent-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire in young boys with conditions affecting sex development (PRO-CSD).

DESIGN

Consecutive sample cross-sectional study.

SETTING

A single tertiary children's hospital in Glasgow, UK.

PATIENTS

A total number of 98 parents of 98 affected boys with a median age of 3.1 years (10th, 90th: 0.7, 5.4).

INTERVENTIONS

Completion of recently developed brief PRO-CSD consisting of a parent proxy-report (PPR) and a parent self-report (PSR).

MAIN OUTCOMES

The study assessed test-retest reliability in 41 cases as intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and group construct validity in 98 by exploring associations with seven demographic and clinical features.

RESULTS

The median ICC for all items was 0.8 (0.6, 0.9). On the PSR, parents of boys with an external masculinisation score (EMS) of less than 7 out of 12 were more concerned about their child's genitalia compared with those with an EMS of greater than 10.5 (p=0.01). An association with EMS was also observed for questions on future social concerns (p<0.01), future relationships (p<0.01) and stress on receiving the diagnosis (p=0.03). This association with EMS was maintained following adjustment for surgical history, parental age and education level. EMS was the only significant independent determinant of the overall PSR score. In the PPR analysis, parents in the lower socioeconomic grouping and those without tertiary education reported more concerns on the physical functioning of their children.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychometric properties of the PRO-CSD tool demonstrate its utility for the screening of parent-reported, condition-specific health-related quality of life outcomes in young boys with a CSD.

摘要

目的

验证一份简短的家长报告结局(PRO)问卷在患有性发育相关疾病(PRO-CSD)的幼龄男孩中的有效性。

设计

连续样本横断面研究。

地点

英国格拉斯哥的一家三级儿童医院。

患者

98名患病男孩的98位家长,中位年龄为3.1岁(第10百分位数、第90百分位数:0.7、5.4)。

干预措施

完成最近开发的简短PRO-CSD问卷,包括家长代理报告(PPR)和家长自我报告(PSR)。

主要结局

该研究通过探索与七个人口统计学和临床特征的关联,评估了41例病例的重测信度(组内相关系数,ICC)以及98例的组构念效度。

结果

所有项目的中位ICC为0.8(0.6,0.9)。在PSR方面,外部男性化评分(EMS)低于12分中7分的男孩的家长比EMS高于10.5分的家长更担心孩子的生殖器(p=0.01)。在关于未来社会担忧(p<0.01)、未来人际关系(p<0.01)以及接受诊断时的压力(p=0.03)的问题上,也观察到与EMS的关联。在对手术史、父母年龄和教育水平进行调整后,这种与EMS的关联依然存在。EMS是PSR总体评分的唯一显著独立决定因素。在PPR分析中,社会经济分组较低以及未接受高等教育的家长报告对孩子身体功能更为担忧。

结论

PRO-CSD工具的心理测量特性表明其可用于筛查家长报告的、患有CSD的幼龄男孩特定疾病相关的健康相关生活质量结局。

相似文献

1
Validation of a parent-reported outcome measure for young boys with a condition affecting sex development (PRO-CSD).一种用于患有影响性发育疾病的幼小男孩的家长报告结局指标(PRO-CSD)的验证。
Arch Dis Child. 2025 Jun 8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-328377.
2
Parent training interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years.针对5至18岁儿童注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD003018. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003018.pub3.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
The risks, benefits, and resource implications of different diets in gastrostomy-fed children: The YourTube mixed method study.胃造口喂养儿童不同饮食的风险、益处及资源影响:YouTube混合方法研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(25):1-21. doi: 10.3310/RRREF7741.
5
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
6
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
7
Parenting interventions to support parent/child attachment and psychosocial adjustment in foster and adoptive parents and children: A systematic review.支持寄养和领养父母及子女之间亲子依恋和心理社会适应的养育干预措施:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 5;18(1):e1209. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1209. eCollection 2022 Mar.
8
Non-pharmacological interventions for assisting the induction of anaesthesia in children.用于辅助儿童麻醉诱导的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 14;2015(7):CD006447. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006447.pub3.
9
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
10
Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in hospitalized children.促进住院儿童睡眠的非药物干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 15;6(6):CD012908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012908.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of a short version of the quality of life-DSD questionnaire for parents of young children with conditions affecting sex development.影响性发育的幼儿家长生活质量 - DSD问卷简版的编制与验证
Endocr Connect. 2024 Oct 7;13(11). doi: 10.1530/EC-24-0300. Print 2024 Oct 1.
2
Body image and psychosocial outcomes in youth and young adults with differences of sex development: a multi-method study.性别发育差异的青年和年轻成年人的身体意象和心理社会结局:一项多方法研究。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2024 Jul 1;49(7):512-523. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsae041.
3
Are We Agreed? Self- Versus Proxy-Reporting of Paediatric Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Using Generic Preference-Based Measures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
是否达成一致?使用通用偏好量表自评和代理报告儿童健康相关生活质量(HRQoL):系统评价和荟萃分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Nov;40(11):1043-1067. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01177-z. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
4
Parents of Children With Newly Diagnosed Disorders of Sex Development Identify Major Concerns: A Qualitative Study.父母对新诊断出的性别发育障碍儿童的主要关注点:一项定性研究。
Urology. 2022 Jun;164:218-223. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.01.001. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
5
A Nationwide Study of the Prevalence and Initial Management of Atypical Genitalia in the Newborn in Scotland.苏格兰全国范围内新生儿非典型性生殖器的患病率及初始处理研究。
Sex Dev. 2022;16(1):11-18. doi: 10.1159/000517327. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
6
How do children and adolescents experience healthcare professionals? Scoping review and interpretive synthesis.儿童和青少年如何体验医疗保健专业人员?范围审查和解释性综合。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 9;11(7):e054368. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054368.
7
Society for Endocrinology UK Guidance on the initial evaluation of a suspected difference or disorder of sex development (Revised 2021).英国内分泌学会关于疑似性别发育差异或障碍的初步评估指南(2021 年修订)。
Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2021 Dec;95(6):818-840. doi: 10.1111/cen.14528. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
8
Psychosocial care and support in the field of intersex/diverse sex development (dsd): counselling experiences, localisation and needed improvements.两性畸形/性别发育多样化领域的心理社会关怀和支持:咨询经验、本地化和需要改进的地方。
Int J Impot Res. 2021 Mar;33(2):228-242. doi: 10.1038/s41443-021-00422-x. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
9
A comparison of self-reported and proxy-reported health utilities in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童自报和代理报告健康效用的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Feb 5;19(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01677-0.
10
Psychosocial Functioning Among Children With and Without Differences of Sex Development.患有和不患有性发育差异的儿童的社会心理功能。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2021 Jan 20;46(1):69-79. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa089.