Khoong Elaine C, Casillas Alejandra, Gutierrez Griselda, Lyles Courtney R, Pandita Deepti, Richardson Safiya, Rodriguez Jorge A
Perspect Biol Med. 2025;68(2):351-369. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2025.a962029.
Health care has become increasingly digitized. Given that under-invested health systems and patient populations frequently have worse access to the newest innovations, there is concern that this digitalization may exacerbate preexisting health inequities. This article discusses the multiple ways that digital health may increase health inequities. Using case studies presented by digital health leaders in different roles and settings, it provides examples of how health systems can adopt and implement innovative tools to deliver care while centering health equity. The case studies highlight five guidelines that health-care systems should consider as they weigh the equity implications of adopting any digital tool: auditing benefits, institutional incentives, elevating frontline and patient perspectives, long-term community engagement, and protecting data.
医疗保健已日益数字化。鉴于投资不足的卫生系统和患者群体往往更难接触到最新创新成果,人们担心这种数字化可能会加剧现有的健康不平等现象。本文探讨了数字健康可能加剧健康不平等的多种方式。通过数字健康领域不同角色和背景的领导者所呈现的案例研究,提供了卫生系统如何采用和实施创新工具来提供护理同时以健康公平为核心的示例。这些案例研究突出了医疗保健系统在权衡采用任何数字工具对公平性的影响时应考虑的五条指导原则:评估益处、机构激励措施、提升一线人员和患者的视角、长期社区参与以及保护数据。