• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低髂总静脉汇合处的微创L5-S1前路经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)椎间融合器置入作为外侧前路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)暴露困难时的补救选择:4例报告

Minimally Invasive L5-S1 Anterior TLIF Cage Placement in Lateral ALIF Exposure as a Bailout Option for Low Iliocaval Junctions: Report of Four Cases.

作者信息

Kim Timothy Y, Pham Martin H

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California, United States.

出版信息

Asian J Neurosurg. 2025 Mar 20;20(2):417-422. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1806728. eCollection 2025 Jun.

DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1806728
PMID:40485778
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12136957/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to demonstrate that anteriorly placed transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) footprint bullet cage is a safe and effective bailout option if difficult left common iliac vein (LCIV) anatomy is unexpectedly encountered during the L5-S1 lateral anterior lumbar interbody fusion (L-ALIF). This retrospective case series includes four patients who received anteriorly placed TLIF cages at L5-S1 during L-ALIF surgery. Demographics, complications, and clinical/radiographic results were collected. The analysis included four female patients with a mean age of 59.0 years and mean body mass index (BMI) of 23.9. Three patients had degenerative conditions and one patient had a deformity. All the patients had an LCIV obstructing the center of the L5-S1 disk space, and titanium TLIF bullet cages were placed and secured with washers and screws. The L5-S1 segmental lordosis increased by 8.3 ± 6.1 degrees with a final mean lordosis of 23.5 ± 8.4 degrees; the L5-S1 intradiskal angle increased by 12.0 ± 7.0 degrees with a final mean disk angle of 18.8 ± 7.0 degrees; the posterior disk height increased by 4.4 ± 2.7 mm with a final mean disk height of 8.0 ± 2.1 mm. The mean numerical rating scale (NRS) for back pain improved by 5.3 ± 2.5 and the mean NRS leg pain improved by 7.7 ± 2.5 over a mean follow-up of 14 months (range: 6-20). There have been no perioperative complications or implant failure to date. If challenging vascular anatomy is encountered during L-ALIF exposure that prevents ALIF footprint cage placement, proceeding with smaller TLIF bullet cage placement anteriorly rather than abandoning the surgical approach is a safe and effective option.

摘要

本研究的目的是证明,如果在L5-S1侧前方腰椎椎间融合术(L-ALIF)期间意外遇到困难的左髂总静脉(LCIV)解剖结构,在前方放置经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合(TLIF)足迹子弹笼是一种安全有效的补救选择。本回顾性病例系列包括4例在L-ALIF手术期间于L5-S1处接受前方放置TLIF笼的患者。收集了人口统计学、并发症以及临床/影像学结果。分析纳入了4例女性患者,平均年龄59.0岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为23.9。3例患者患有退行性疾病,1例患者有畸形。所有患者的LCIV均阻塞L5-S1椎间盘间隙中心,放置了钛制TLIF子弹笼,并用垫圈和螺钉固定。L5-S1节段性前凸增加了8.3±6.1度,最终平均前凸为23.5±8.4度;L5-S1椎间盘内角度增加了12.0±7.0度,最终平均椎间盘角度为18.8±7.0度;椎间盘后高度增加了4.4±2.7毫米,最终平均椎间盘高度为8.0±2.1毫米。在平均14个月(范围:6 - 20个月)的随访中,背痛的平均数字评定量表(NRS)改善了5.3±2.5,腿痛的平均NRS改善了7.7±2.5。迄今为止,尚无围手术期并发症或植入物失败的情况。如果在L-ALIF暴露期间遇到具有挑战性的血管解剖结构,阻止了ALIF足迹笼的放置,那么向前方放置较小的TLIF子弹笼而不是放弃手术入路是一种安全有效的选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ac/12136957/8a52d58f0399/10-1055-s-0045-1806728-i2490006-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ac/12136957/dc1e814db92c/10-1055-s-0045-1806728-i2490006-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ac/12136957/eb07822eac76/10-1055-s-0045-1806728-i2490006-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ac/12136957/c85069c89de2/10-1055-s-0045-1806728-i2490006-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ac/12136957/8a52d58f0399/10-1055-s-0045-1806728-i2490006-4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ac/12136957/dc1e814db92c/10-1055-s-0045-1806728-i2490006-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ac/12136957/eb07822eac76/10-1055-s-0045-1806728-i2490006-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ac/12136957/c85069c89de2/10-1055-s-0045-1806728-i2490006-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56ac/12136957/8a52d58f0399/10-1055-s-0045-1806728-i2490006-4.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimally Invasive L5-S1 Anterior TLIF Cage Placement in Lateral ALIF Exposure as a Bailout Option for Low Iliocaval Junctions: Report of Four Cases.低髂总静脉汇合处的微创L5-S1前路经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(TLIF)椎间融合器置入作为外侧前路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)暴露困难时的补救选择:4例报告
Asian J Neurosurg. 2025 Mar 20;20(2):417-422. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1806728. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
L4-S1 ALIF restores and maintains lordosis while minimizing adjacent segment disease compared to L4-S1 TLIF.与L4-S1经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术相比,L4-S1前路腰椎椎体间融合术可恢复并维持脊柱前凸,同时将相邻节段疾病的发生降至最低。
Spine J. 2025 Jun 4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.06.001.
3
Anterior Approach Total Ankle Arthroplasty with Patient-Specific Cut Guides.使用患者特异性截骨导向器的前路全踝关节置换术。
JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2025 Aug 15;15(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.23.00027. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
4
L5/S1 Fusion Rates in Degenerative Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review Comparing ALIF, TLIF, and Axial Interbody Arthrodesis.退行性脊柱手术中L5/S1融合率:比较前路腰椎椎间融合术、经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术和轴向椎间融合术的系统评价
Clin Spine Surg. 2016 May;29(4):150-5. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000356.
5
Clinical Efficacy of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.单侧双孔椎间孔镜下经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的临床疗效
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan;193:98-99. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.064. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
6
A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF).前路腰椎间融合术(ALIF)与后路腰椎间融合术(PLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(PLF)的系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):1911-1926. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07567-x. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
7
Safety and Viability of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Complex Revision Lumbar Spine Surgeries: Insights From a Case Series of 135 Patients on Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion/Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Removal.复杂腰椎翻修手术中腰椎前路椎间融合术的安全性与可行性:来自135例经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术/后路腰椎椎间融合器取出病例系列的见解
Int J Spine Surg. 2025 Jun 12;19(3):261-268. doi: 10.14444/8753.
8
Enhancing the Technical Pearls for L5-S1 Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Body Mass Index More Than 30: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at 1-Year Follow-Up.提高体重指数大于30的患者L5-S1前路腰椎椎间融合术的技术要点:1年随访的临床和影像学结果
World Neurosurg. 2025 Feb;194:123536. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.11.119. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
9
Early radiological adjacent segment changes following L4/5 fusion: a retrospective comparative study of oblique lateral interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.L4/5融合术后早期影像学相邻节段变化:斜外侧椎间融合术与微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的回顾性比较研究
PeerJ. 2025 Aug 21;13:e19918. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19918. eCollection 2025.
10
Expandable cages that expand both height and lordosis provide improved immediate effect on sagittal alignment and short-term clinical outcomes following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).在微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(MIS TLIF)后,能够同时增加高度和恢复腰椎前凸的可扩张椎间融合器对矢状面排列和短期临床疗效具有更好的即刻效果。
J Spine Surg. 2024 Mar 20;10(1):55-67. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-106. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term comparison of anterior (ALIF) versus transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity score-matched register-based study.前路(ALIF)与经椎间孔(TLIF)腰椎体间融合术的长期比较:倾向评分匹配的基于登记的研究。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):1109-1119. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08060-1. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
2
Single position L5-S1 lateral ALIF with simultaneous robotic posterior fixation is safe and improves regional alignment and lordosis distribution index.单纯侧方 L5-S1 前路腰椎间融合术(ALIF)联合机器人辅助后路固定是安全的,可改善局部曲度和前凸分布指数。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Sep;33(9):3583-3592. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07841-y. Epub 2023 Jul 15.
3
L5-S1 Pseudoarthrosis Rate with ALIF Versus TLIF in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgeries: A Retrospective Analysis of 100 Patients.
后路腰椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎间融合术治疗成人脊柱畸形术后 L5-S1 假关节发生率的回顾性分析:100 例患者的研究。
World Neurosurg. 2023 Jul;175:e1265-e1276. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.04.113. Epub 2023 May 3.
4
Single-Position Anterior and Lateral Lumbar Fusion in the Supine Position: A Novel Technique for Multilevel Arthrodesis.仰卧位单切口前路与后路腰椎融合术:一种多节段融合的新方法。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Dec;168:4-10. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.012. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
5
Need of vascular surgeon and comparison of value for anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) in lateral decubitus: Delphi consensus.血管外科医生的需求及侧卧位前路腰椎间融合术(ALIF)的价值比较:德尔菲共识。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Sep;31(9):2270-2278. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07319-3. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
6
ALIF Versus TLIF for L5-S1 Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: ALIF Demonstrates Superior Segmental and Regional Radiographic Outcomes and Clinical Improvements Across More Patient-reported Outcome Measures Domains.ALIF 与 TLIF 治疗 L5-S1 峡部裂性滑脱:ALIF 在更多患者报告结局测量领域显示出更优的节段和区域影像学结果和临床改善。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Jun 1;47(11):808-816. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004333. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
7
Indirect Decompression for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis.间接减压治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症
Int J Spine Surg. 2021 Dec;15(6):1066-1071. doi: 10.14444/8192.
8
Minimally Invasive L5-S1 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Simultaneous Robotic Single Position Posterior Fixation: 2-Dimensional Operative Video.微创L5-S1斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术联合机器人单部位后路固定:二维手术视频
Oper Neurosurg. 2021 Nov 15;21(6):E543. doi: 10.1093/ons/opab301.
9
Technical and Conceptual Review on the L5-S1 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Surgery (OLIF51).L5-S1斜外侧椎间融合手术(OLIF51)的技术与概念综述
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2020 Jun 18;5(1):1-9. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2020-0086. eCollection 2021.
10
A meta-analysis comparing ALIF, PLIF, TLIF and LLIF.一项比较前路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)、后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)和斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(LLIF)的荟萃分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Oct;44:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jul 1.