Carlos Melissa Lourdes, Singh Pushpraj, Jafri Asif Dabeer, Mani Utsav Anand, Sundar Shyam
Anesthesiology, P.D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, IND.
Anesthesiology, Career Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, IND.
Cureus. 2025 May 7;17(5):e83690. doi: 10.7759/cureus.83690. eCollection 2025 May.
Background and objectives Cricothyrotomy is a life-saving procedure in "cannot intubate, cannot ventilate" scenarios, with accurate identification of the cricothyroid membrane (CTM) being critical to success. Palpation techniques are often unreliable, especially in obese patients. This study aimed to compare the time taken and success rates of transverse versus longitudinal ultrasound approaches for CTM identification by anesthesiology trainees in volunteers of varying body habitus. Methods In this prospective, randomized, crossover study, 55 novice anesthesiology residents received a brief training session, followed by ultrasound-guided CTM identification on slender, overweight, and obese male volunteers using both transverse and longitudinal techniques. Each attempt was timed and confirmed by an expert anesthesiologist. Statistical analyses included the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for time comparisons and the Cochran Q test for success rates, with a success threshold defined as CTM identification within 120 seconds. Results The transverse approach demonstrated similar identification times to the longitudinal approach in slender (64.5±46.5 sec vs. 67.7±46.8 sec) and overweight (76.4±54.7 sec vs. 67.7±46.8 sec) volunteers (p>0.05), but was significantly faster in obese volunteers (88.4±59 sec vs. 93.8±64.8 sec, p=0.011). Success rates within 120 seconds were high across all groups: 100% in slender, 98.2% in overweight, and 96.3% in obese volunteers, with no significant difference between techniques, though the transverse approach showed a slight advantage in obese subjects. Conclusions Both ultrasound techniques are effective for CTM identification by novice anesthesiology residents. The transverse approach offers a time advantage in obese patients. High success rates were achieved following brief training, supporting the integration of ultrasound into emergency airway management protocols, particularly for anticipated difficult airways.
环甲膜切开术是在“无法插管、无法通气”情况下的一种挽救生命的操作,准确识别环甲膜(CTM)是成功的关键。触诊技术往往不可靠,尤其是在肥胖患者中。本研究旨在比较麻醉学实习生在不同体型志愿者中采用横向与纵向超声方法识别CTM的时间和成功率。方法:在这项前瞻性、随机、交叉研究中,55名麻醉学新手住院医师接受了简短培训,随后使用横向和纵向技术对体型苗条、超重和肥胖的男性志愿者进行超声引导下的CTM识别。每次尝试都进行计时,并由一名专家麻醉师确认。统计分析包括用于时间比较的Wilcoxon符号秩检验和用于成功率的Cochran Q检验,成功阈值定义为在120秒内识别出CTM。结果:横向方法在体型苗条(64.5±46.5秒对67.7±46.8秒)和超重(76.4±54.7秒对67.7±46.8秒)志愿者中与纵向方法的识别时间相似(p>0.05),但在肥胖志愿者中明显更快(分别为88.4±59秒和93.8±64.8秒,p=0.011)。所有组在120秒内的成功率都很高:体型苗条的志愿者为100%,超重的为98.2%,肥胖的为96.3%,不同技术之间无显著差异,不过横向方法在肥胖受试者中显示出轻微优势。结论:两种超声技术对麻醉学新手住院医师识别CTM均有效。横向方法在肥胖患者中具有时间优势。经过简短培训后成功率很高,支持将超声纳入紧急气道管理方案,特别是对于预期的困难气道。