Hatton C Ross, Levine Adam S, Pollack Porter Keshia M, Hager Erin R
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Department of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205.
Child Youth Serv Rev. 2025 May;172. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108231. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
In 2021, the federal government passed a one-year expanded child tax credit (ECTC), which increased the credit's amount, made it fully refundable, and issued half of the credit as monthly payments to households with children. This policy, with its wide income-eligibility, can be used to better understand how families use cash benefits, as well as how those uses and related decision-making processes vary by financial context. This explanatory sequential mixed methods study uses survey and interview data to examine how caregivers of varying income levels living in Maryland used the funds and the factors shaping those decisions. We surveyed 306 caregivers between November 2022 and February 2023 about their receipt and use of the child tax credit. We then used stratified purposeful sampling to recruit 22 caregivers from three income groups (<185%, 185%-300%, and 300%+ of the federal poverty line) for interviews between March and June 2023. We used descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and thematic content analysis to identify how caregivers used the funds, explore variation by income, and described factors shaping ECTC use. Caregivers often reported using the funds for necessities like food and utilities; however, many caregivers-particularly those with higher incomes-also used the funds for debt payments and savings and investments. Financial context (e.g., job and income loss) played a paramount role in both constraining and explaining how caregivers used the funds; however, other factors like family structure, benefit timing, payment structure, and the ECTC's framing as a child benefit were also described as factors that shaped caregivers' decisions. The household and policy level factors identified in this study reveal important insights into how the structure and implementation of policies like the ECTC might shape how they are used, as well as how the ECTC's wide income-eligibility might have impacted health equity across financial contexts.
2021年,联邦政府通过了一项为期一年的扩大儿童税收抵免(ECTC)政策,该政策提高了抵免额度,使其完全可退还,并将一半的抵免额以月度付款的形式发放给有子女的家庭。这项政策具有广泛的收入资格范围,可用于更好地了解家庭如何使用现金福利,以及这些使用方式和相关决策过程如何因经济状况而异。这项解释性序列混合方法研究使用调查和访谈数据,来考察生活在马里兰州不同收入水平的照料者如何使用这些资金以及影响这些决策的因素。我们在2022年11月至2023年2月期间对306名照料者进行了调查,了解他们对儿童税收抵免的领取和使用情况。然后,我们采用分层目的抽样法,从三个收入组(低于联邦贫困线的185%、185%-300%以及300%以上)中招募了22名照料者,在2023年3月至6月期间进行访谈。我们使用描述性统计、卡方检验和主题内容分析,来确定照料者如何使用资金,探讨收入差异,并描述影响ECTC使用的因素。照料者经常报告说将资金用于食品和水电费等必需品;然而,许多照料者,尤其是那些高收入者,也将资金用于偿还债务以及储蓄和投资。经济状况(如失业和收入损失)在限制和解释照料者如何使用资金方面都起着至关重要的作用;然而,其他因素,如家庭结构、福利发放时间、支付结构以及ECTC作为儿童福利的框架,也被描述为影响照料者决策的因素。本研究中确定的家庭和政策层面因素,揭示了关于ECTC等政策的结构和实施可能如何影响其使用方式,以及ECTC广泛的收入资格范围可能如何在不同经济状况下影响健康公平性的重要见解。