Mullany Kellie, Masi Barbara, Yodh Jaya G, Sheppard Imanni, Park Grace, Hegazy Samar A
Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Department of Biomedical and Translational Sciences, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Medical Education, New York City, NY, USA.
Acad Pathol. 2025 May 16;12(2):100169. doi: 10.1016/j.acpath.2025.100169. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
The Social Determinants of Health significantly impact patient care, and understanding their role in the disease process and patient management is essential to high-quality healthcare. Several barriers exist to integrating social determinants of health into medical curricula, including the lack of consensus on evidence-based teaching methods. In this context, our study investigated the impact of integrating social determinants of health into pre-clerkship problem-based learning courses using concept mapping on the clinical problem-solving process. Fourteen pre-clerkship medical students voluntarily participated and were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups. The experimental group education intervention included two problem-based cases with social determinants of health-informed probes to promote linking those determinants to the disease process and develop a treatment plan using concept mapping. The control group participated in the same cases without the education intervention. Students in both groups completed post-session assignments that included two new cases, individual concept maps, and recorded reflections. Concept maps were scored using a scoring rubric. The scores of both groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Recorded reflections and concept maps were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis coding method. Quantitative data analysis showed that the experimental group received significantly higher scores than the control group. Qualitative data analysis highlighted substantial differences in clinical problem-solving approaches. The control group's clinical reasoning approach focused mainly on the clinical aspects of the case. The experimental group followed a social determinants of health-informed clinical reasoning approach to patient-centered treatment plans with balanced therapeutic/nontherapeutic elements.
健康的社会决定因素对患者护理有重大影响,了解它们在疾病过程和患者管理中的作用对于高质量医疗保健至关重要。将健康的社会决定因素纳入医学课程存在若干障碍,包括在循证教学方法上缺乏共识。在此背景下,我们的研究调查了在临床前基于问题的学习课程中,通过概念图将健康的社会决定因素整合到临床问题解决过程中的影响。14名临床前医学生自愿参与,并被随机分配到对照组和实验组。实验组的教育干预包括两个基于问题的案例,其中包含有关健康社会决定因素的探究,以促进将这些决定因素与疾病过程联系起来,并使用概念图制定治疗计划。对照组参与相同的案例,但没有接受教育干预。两组学生都完成了课后作业,包括两个新案例、个人概念图和记录的反思。使用评分量表对概念图进行评分。使用曼-惠特尼检验比较两组的分数。使用反思性主题分析编码方法对记录的反思和概念图进行分析。定量数据分析表明,实验组的得分显著高于对照组。定性数据分析突出了临床问题解决方法的显著差异。对照组的临床推理方法主要侧重于案例的临床方面。实验组采用以健康社会决定因素为依据的临床推理方法,制定以患者为中心的治疗计划,其中治疗性/非治疗性要素保持平衡。