Prayitno Ari, Sitaresmi Mei Neni, Alisjahbana Bachti, Halim Carolina, Wardati Fauchil, Yudiansyach Mentari, Hadinegoro Sri Rezeki
Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Front Public Health. 2025 May 23;13:1540121. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1540121. eCollection 2025.
Dengue is a significant public health issue in Indonesia, facing a substantial year-round disease burden and rising incidence. However, comprehensive assessments of Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices (KAP) regarding dengue in the Indonesian adult population are limited. This study provides one of the first comprehensive evaluations of KAP in Indonesia, aiming to inform integrated dengue management programs.
This study utilized data from the larger GEMKAP study, which covered seven countries, including Indonesia. The GEMKAP study was a cross-sectional electronic survey conducted in September and October 2022, targeting adults aged 21 to 60, recruited through email invitations from an existing web-based panel. The survey, consisting of 35 questions, was developed based on existing dengue KAP studies and was translated into Bahasa Indonesia.
Analysis of 600 Indonesian responses revealed higher levels of Attitudes (65%) and Practices (56%) compared to Knowledge (46%). Most respondents correctly identified dengue transmission through mosquitoes (85%) and mosquito breeding grounds (98%); however, awareness of dengue serotypes (48%) and multiple infection risks (50%) was lower. Out of the dengue prevention methods practiced, draining and covering water containers was rated the safest and most effective (8.4 and 8.1, respectively, on a scale from 0 to 10). In comparison, dengue vaccination was perceived as generally safe and effective (7.6 and 7.7, respectively, on a scale from 0 to 10). Willingness to receive dengue vaccines was moderate (51%), with 60% unaware of vaccine availability. Fear of side effects (18%) was the most common reason for moderate willingness to vaccinate. Respondents preferred search engines (88%) and social media (85%) as sources to search health information, with doctors being the most trusted stakeholder to receive health information from (94%). The most favored dengue management strategy was combining vaccination with education and vector control (42%).
The KAP assessment identified strengths and gaps in dengue awareness and practices among Indonesians. The gaps identified from the KAP results underscore the need for an integrated approach combining vector control, vaccination, and education. As the most trusted stakeholders, HCPs can play a key role in supporting the effective implementation of dengue management strategies.
登革热是印度尼西亚一个重大的公共卫生问题,全年面临着巨大的疾病负担且发病率不断上升。然而,针对印度尼西亚成年人群体对登革热的知识、态度和行为(KAP)的全面评估却很有限。本研究首次对印度尼西亚的KAP进行了全面评估之一,旨在为登革热综合管理项目提供信息。
本研究利用了来自规模更大的GEMKAP研究的数据,该研究覆盖了包括印度尼西亚在内的七个国家。GEMKAP研究是一项于2022年9月和10月进行的横断面电子调查,目标人群为21至60岁的成年人,通过现有网络小组的电子邮件邀请招募。该调查由35个问题组成,基于现有的登革热KAP研究开发,并翻译成了印尼语。
对600份印度尼西亚受访者的分析显示,与知识水平(46%)相比,态度(65%)和行为(56%)水平更高。大多数受访者正确识别了登革热通过蚊子传播(85%)和蚊子滋生地(98%);然而,对登革热血清型(48%)和多重感染风险(50%)的知晓率较低。在实施的登革热预防方法中,排空和覆盖盛水容器被评为最安全和最有效的方法(分别为8.4和8.1,评分范围为0至10)。相比之下,登革热疫苗被认为总体上安全有效(分别为7.6和7.7,评分范围为0至10)。接受登革热疫苗的意愿适中(51%),60%的人不知道有疫苗可用。对副作用的恐惧(18%)是接受疫苗意愿适中的最常见原因。受访者更喜欢搜索引擎(88%)和社交媒体(85%)作为搜索健康信息的来源,并认为医生是最值得信赖的健康信息接收方(94%)。最受欢迎的登革热管理策略是将疫苗接种与教育和病媒控制相结合(42%)。
KAP评估确定了印度尼西亚人在登革热认知和行为方面的优势和差距。从KAP结果中发现的差距凸显了采取病媒控制、疫苗接种和教育相结合的综合方法的必要性。作为最值得信赖的利益相关者,医疗保健人员在支持登革热管理策略的有效实施方面可以发挥关键作用。