Bloom Jesse D
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Seattle, WA 98103, USA.
Mol Biol Evol. 2025 Jun 4;42(6). doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaf118.
Several years ago, I published a paper that described the discrepancy between outgroup and date-based methods for rooting the SARS-CoV-2 phylogenetic tree, and proposed the discrepancy could arise from biases among the available early viral sequences. Here, I explain why the root remains uncertain, including via an interactive narrative at https://nextstrain.org/groups/jbloomlab/narratives/SARS2-rooting/early-SARS2-trees-v1 that enables the reader to examine the underlying data and understand discrepancies that lead different methods to reach different inferences about the root. I also demonstrate clear evidence of bias among the earliest available sequences, and explain why the root of the SARS-CoV-2 tree cannot be conclusively resolved with the current data.
几年前,我发表了一篇论文,描述了用于确定严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)系统发育树根部的外类群法和基于日期的方法之间的差异,并提出这种差异可能源于现有早期病毒序列中的偏差。在此,我解释了为什么根部仍然不确定,包括通过https://nextstrain.org/groups/jbloomlab/narratives/SARS2-rooting/early-SARS2-trees-v1上的交互式叙述,读者可以通过该叙述检查基础数据,并理解导致不同方法对根部得出不同推断的差异。我还展示了最早可用序列中存在偏差的明确证据,并解释了为什么用当前数据无法最终确定SARS-CoV-2树的根部。