Waaben J, Andersen K, Husum B
Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;19(2):149-53. doi: 10.3109/14017438509102710.
Pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been suggested to be superior to nonpulsatile CPB. This report concerns a newly developed pulsatile pump for clinical use. It is designed as a positive displacement pump, with blood allowed to collect in a valved cavity from which it is ejected by the reciprocating action of a piston. Using a uniform procedure of anaesthesia and surgery, 14 pigs were subjected to CPB at 37 degrees C for 3 hours. The pulsatile pump was used in seven pigs and a conventional roller pump in the other seven. The wave-form of the pulse during pulsatile CPB was similar to that recorded in the pigs before bypass. The values for rate of pressure change with respect to time (dp/dt) obtained in the aorta were close to the pre-CPB values. No difference was found between the two groups with respect to platelet count or haemolysis. The investigated pulsatile device appeared to be reliable and easy to handle, and the pulsation it produced closely resembled the physiologic pulse-wave form.
有人认为搏动性体外循环(CPB)优于非搏动性CPB。本报告涉及一种新开发的用于临床的搏动泵。它被设计为容积式泵,血液在有瓣膜的腔室中积聚,通过活塞的往复运动将其排出。采用统一的麻醉和手术程序,14只猪在37℃下进行CPB 3小时。7只猪使用搏动泵,另外7只猪使用传统的滚压泵。搏动性CPB期间的脉搏波形与旁路前猪体内记录的波形相似。在主动脉中获得的压力随时间变化率(dp/dt)值接近CPB前的值。两组在血小板计数或溶血方面未发现差异。所研究的搏动装置似乎可靠且易于操作,其产生的搏动与生理脉搏波形非常相似。