Undar A, Lodge A J, Daggett C W, Runge T M, Ungerleider R M, Calhoon J H
Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA.
Artif Organs. 1998 Aug;22(8):681-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1998.06017.x.
Although the debate still continues over the effectiveness of pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion, it has been clearly proven that there are several significant physiological benefits of pulsatile perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) compared to nonpulsatile perfusion. However, the components of the extracorporeal circuit have not been fully investigated regarding the quality of the pulsatility. In addition, most of these results have been gathered from adult patients, not from neonates and infants. We have designed and tested a neonate-infant pulsatile CPB system using 2 different types of 10 Fr aortic cannulas and membrane oxygenators in 3 kg piglets to evaluate the effects of these components on the pulsatile waveform produced by the system. In terms of the methods, Group 1 (Capiox 308 hollow-fiber membrane oxygenator and DLP aortic cannula with a very short 10 Fr tip [n = 2]) was subjected to a 2 h period of normothermic pulsatile CPB with a pump flow rate of 150 ml/kg/min. Data were obtained at 5, 30, 60, 90, and 120 min of CPB. In Group 2 (Capiox 308 hollow-fiber membrane oxygenator and Elecath aortic cannula with a very long 10 Fr tip [n = 7]) and Group 3 (cobe VPCML Plus flat sheet membrane oxygenator and DLP aortic cannula with a very short 10 Fr tip [n = 7]), the subjects' nasopharyngeal temperatures were reduced to 18 degrees C followed by 1 h of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) and then 40 min rewarming. Data were obtained during normothermic CPB in the pre- and post-DHCA periods. The criteria of pulsatility evaluations were based upon pulse pressure (between 30 and 40 mm Hg), aortic dp/dt (greater than 1000 mm Hg/s), and ejection time (less than 250 ms). The results showed that Group 1 produced flow which was significantly more pulsatile than that of the other 2 groups. Although the same oxygenator was used for Group 2, the quality of the pulsatile flow decreased when using a different aortic cannula. Group 3 did not meet any of the criteria for physiologic pulsatility. In conclusion these data suggest that in addition to a pulsatile pump, the aortic cannula and the membrane oxygenator must be chosen carefully to achieve physiologic pulsatile flow during CPB.
尽管关于搏动性灌注与非搏动性灌注的有效性的争论仍在继续,但已明确证明,与非搏动性灌注相比,体外循环(CPB)期间搏动性灌注具有若干显著的生理益处。然而,关于体外循环回路组件对搏动质量的影响尚未得到充分研究。此外,这些结果大多来自成年患者,而非新生儿和婴儿。我们设计并测试了一种新生儿 - 婴儿搏动性CPB系统,在3千克仔猪中使用2种不同类型的10 Fr主动脉插管和膜式氧合器,以评估这些组件对系统产生的搏动波形的影响。在方法方面,第1组(Capiox 308中空纤维膜式氧合器和DLP主动脉插管,10 Fr尖端非常短[n = 2])进行了2小时的常温搏动性CPB,泵流速为150 ml/kg/min。在CPB的5、30、60、90和120分钟时获取数据。在第2组(Capiox 308中空纤维膜式氧合器和Elecath主动脉插管,10 Fr尖端非常长[n = 7])和第3组(cobe VPCML Plus平板膜式氧合器和DLP主动脉插管,10 Fr尖端非常短[n = 7])中,将受试者的鼻咽温度降至18摄氏度,随后进行1小时的深低温停循环(DHCA),然后复温40分钟。在DHCA前后的常温CPB期间获取数据。搏动性评估标准基于脉压(30至40 mmHg之间)、主动脉dp/dt(大于1000 mmHg/s)和射血时间(小于250毫秒)。结果显示,第1组产生的血流搏动性明显高于其他两组。尽管第2组使用了相同的氧合器,但使用不同的主动脉插管时,搏动血流的质量下降。第3组未达到任何生理搏动性标准。总之,这些数据表明,除了搏动泵之外,还必须仔细选择主动脉插管和膜式氧合器,以在CPB期间实现生理搏动血流。