Vischer W A, Stalder H, Faupel D M
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1985 Aug 31;115(35):1196-9.
An attempt was made to explain the fact that toxic shock syndrome (TSS) is far less often observed among Swiss women than in the USA. To this end, 353 patients were examined for vaginal infection with Staphylococcus aureus, and 131 strains of Staphylococcus aureus of various origins tested for the formation of "toxic shock syndrome toxin one" (TSST-1). In addition, the patients were questioned about the use of tampons for menstrual hygiene. Taking all age groups into consideration, 2.3% of the 353 patients, and 4.8% of those younger than 27 years, were Staphylococcus aureus carriers. 19.8% of the tested strains of Staphylococcus aureus produced TSST-1. Since these figures are comparable with the US statistics, they afford no explanation for the difference in the incidence of TSS. On the other hand, it seems very probable that the much less common use of tampons, especially the highly absorbent variety, could be responsible. It is also possible that TSS is less often recognized and reported in Switzerland.
人们试图解释为何瑞士女性患中毒性休克综合征(TSS)的情况远少于美国女性。为此,对353名患者进行了金黄色葡萄球菌阴道感染检查,并对131株不同来源的金黄色葡萄球菌进行了“中毒性休克综合征毒素1”(TSST - 1)形成检测。此外,还询问了患者月经卫生用品中棉条的使用情况。综合所有年龄组来看,353名患者中有2.3%为金黄色葡萄球菌携带者,27岁以下患者中有4.8%为携带者。所检测的金黄色葡萄球菌菌株中有19.8%产生TSST - 1。由于这些数据与美国的统计数据相当,所以无法解释TSS发病率的差异。另一方面,很有可能是棉条使用频率低得多,尤其是高吸收性棉条的使用频率低得多,导致了这种差异。也有可能在瑞士TSS的诊断和报告较少。