Suppr超能文献

奥纳地韦在中国成人急性非复杂性甲型流感感染中的疗效和安全性:一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照和奥司他韦对照的3期试验。

Efficacy and safety of onradivir in adults with acute uncomplicated influenza A infection in China: a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled and oseltamivir-controlled, phase 3 trial.

作者信息

Yang Zifeng, Zhan Yangqing, Li Zhengtu, Lin Zhengshi, Fang Zhonghao, Li Haijun, Chen Xiaolin, Ding Banghan, Zeng Huiqing, Zhang Xiuwei, Song Yudi, Lin Zejun, Liang Shiwei, Luo Jincan, Huang Jufang, Chen Xiaoxin, Zhong Nanshan

机构信息

National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Guangzhou Laboratory, Bio-Island, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Macau Institute for Applied Research in Medicine and Health, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Guangzhou Laboratory, Bio-Island, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Lancet Respir Med. 2025 Jul;13(7):597-610. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00046-3. Epub 2025 Jun 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Onradivir (ZSP1273) is a potent inhibitor of the PB2 subunit of influenza A virus (IAV) polymerase. Our previous, phase 2 clinical trial showed that a 600 mg regimen of onradivir initiated within 48 h of symptom onset can expedite the recovery of adult patients from acute, uncomplicated influenza. Here, we aimed to evaluate the safety and therapeutic efficacy of onradivir in a larger group with acute, uncomplicated influenza.

METHODS

This randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled and oseltamivir-controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted at 68 clinical sites in China. Eligible participants were adults (aged 18-64 years) with an influenza-like illness who screened positive by rapid IAV antigen testing at the first clinical visit, and had a fever (axillary temperature ≥38·0°C) with at least one moderate systemic and one moderate respiratory symptom within 48 h of symptom onset. Patients were randomly assigned into three treatment groups, stratified by influenza symptom scores (≤11 or ≥12), in a 2:1:1 ratio by an interactive web response system, with each treatment lasting 5 days: 600 mg oral onradivir tablets once daily, 75 mg oral oseltamivir phosphate capsules twice daily, or oral placebo. The primary outcome was the efficacy of onradivir versus placebo in the time to alleviation of symptoms (TTAS), from treatment initiation to the remission of influenza symptoms, in the intention-to-treat infection (ITTI) population (ie, all participants who were randomly assigned and tested positive for IAV). The safety endpoints were the frequency and severity of adverse events in all participants who received treatment at least once. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04683406) and is completed. This clinical trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China (EC-2020-080[YW]-02).

FINDINGS

Between May 12, 2022, and May 16, 2023, 943 patients were screened, of whom 750 met the inclusion criteria and were randomly assigned to a group. 48 had negative IAV tests, resulting in an ITTI population of 702 participants (413 [59%] men and 289 [41%] women; mean age 28·1 years [SD 9·7]): 349 in the onradivir group, 177 in the oseltamivir group, and 176 in the placebo group. The baseline viral load (mean 5·15 log copies per mL [SD 1·02]) and the total score of seven influenza symptoms at enrolment were similarly distributed among the groups. The median TTAS in the onradivir group was significantly shorter than that of placebo (38·83 h [95% CI 35·32-41·18] vs 63·35 h [55·48-68·48], difference -24·52 h, p<0·0001, HR 1·53 [95% CI 1·27-1·85]) and similar to that of the oseltamivir group (42·17 h [38·27-52·83], p=0·092, HR 1·12 [0·93-1·35]. Adverse events occurred in 250 (67%) of 373 in the onradivir group, 104 (55%) of 189 in the placebo group, and 89 (47%) of 188 in the oseltamivir group. Although the incidence of diarrhoea was higher in the onradivir group (184 [49%]) than in the placebo (44 [23%]) or oseltamivir (28 [15%]) groups, most incidences were grade 1 or 2, lasted a median of 2 days (IQR 1-3), and resolved without medication.

INTERPRETATION

Onradivir has similar curative efficacy to oseltamivir for acute, uncomplicated influenza infections in adult patients, with an acceptable safety profile. At a time when reduced susceptibility to antiviral drugs is a growing concern, this study indicates that onradivir could be an alternative antiviral option or a candidate for use in combination with other antiviral agents for uncomplicated IAV infection.

FUNDING

National Multidisciplinary Innovation Team Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Guangdong Science and Technology Foundation; Major Project of Guangzhou National Laboratory; Guangdong Raynovent Biotechnology.

摘要

背景

恩拉地韦(ZSP1273)是甲型流感病毒(IAV)聚合酶PB2亚基的强效抑制剂。我们之前的2期临床试验表明,在症状出现后48小时内开始使用600mg恩拉地韦方案可加速成年急性非复杂性流感患者的康复。在此,我们旨在评估恩拉地韦在更大规模急性非复杂性流感患者群体中的安全性和治疗效果。

方法

这项随机、双盲、多中心、安慰剂对照和奥司他韦对照的3期试验在中国68个临床地点进行。符合条件的参与者为患有流感样疾病的成年人(18 - 64岁),在首次临床就诊时通过快速IAV抗原检测呈阳性,且在症状出现后48小时内发热(腋温≥38.0°C),伴有至少一种中度全身症状和一种中度呼吸道症状。患者通过交互式网络响应系统按2:1:1的比例随机分配到三个治疗组,按流感症状评分(≤11或≥12)分层,每个治疗持续5天:每日一次口服600mg恩拉地韦片、每日两次口服75mg磷酸奥司他韦胶囊或口服安慰剂。主要结局是在意向性治疗感染(ITTI)人群(即所有随机分配且IAV检测呈阳性的参与者)中,从治疗开始到流感症状缓解的症状缓解时间(TTAS)方面恩拉地韦与安慰剂相比的疗效。安全终点是所有至少接受过一次治疗的参与者中不良事件的频率和严重程度。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT04683406)且已完成。本临床试验已获得中国广州医科大学附属第一医院伦理委员会批准(EC - 2020 - 080[YW] - 02)。

结果

在2022年5月12日至2023年5月16日期间,筛查了943名患者,其中750名符合纳入标准并被随机分组。48名患者IAV检测为阴性,导致ITT人群有702名参与者(413名[59%]男性和289名[41%]女性;平均年龄28.1岁[标准差9.7]):恩拉地韦组349名、奥司他韦组177名、安慰剂组176名。各治疗组之间基线病毒载量(平均每毫升5.15 log拷贝数[标准差1.02])和入组时七种流感症状的总分分布相似。恩拉地韦组的TTAS中位数显著短于安慰剂组(38.83小时[95%CI 35.32 - 41.18]对比63.35小时[55.48 - 68.48],差值 - 24.52小时,p < 0.0001,HR 1.53[95%CI 1.27 - 1.85]),且与奥司他韦组相似(42.17小时[38.27 - 52.83],p = 0.092,HR 1.12[0.93 - 1.35])。恩拉地韦组373名患者中有250名(67%)发生不良事件,安慰剂组189名患者中有104名(55%),奥司他韦组188名患者中有89名(47%)。虽然恩拉地韦组腹泻的发生率高于安慰剂组(184名[49%])或奥司他韦组(28名[15%]),但大多数腹泻事件为1级或2级,持续时间中位数为2天(IQR 1 - 3),且无需药物治疗即可缓解。

解读

恩拉地韦对成年急性非复杂性流感感染的疗效与奥司他韦相似,且安全性可接受。在对抗病毒药物敏感性降低日益受到关注的当下,本研究表明恩拉地韦可能是一种替代抗病毒选择或可作为与其他抗病毒药物联合用于非复杂性IAV感染的候选药物。

资助

国家中医药多学科创新团队项目;国家自然科学基金;广东省科技基金;广州国家实验室重大项目;广东瑞诺维特生物技术公司

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验