Zhao Si-Min, Liu Wen-Xin, Miao Qi-Yu, Li Jia-Min, Sun Lu-Min, Wu Shui-Ping
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory for Coastal Ecology and Environmental Studies, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China.
College of Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025 May;32(25):15342-15358. doi: 10.1007/s11356-025-36624-9. Epub 2025 Jun 9.
Indoor non-energy combustion, whose primary purpose is not to generate energy, is a major source of indoor particulate matter. This study analyzed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), water-soluble heavy metals (HMs), and dithiothreitol-based oxidative potential (OP) in total particulate matter (TPM) from incense coils, mosquito coils, moxa, joss paper, joss sticks, candles, and cigarettes. HMs derived from combustibles, while PAHs originated from incomplete combustion. Specially, 5-ring PAHs dominated in candle samples, whereas 3 - 4-ring were prevalent in other samples. Zn, Fe, Ba, and Cr were the primary water-soluble HMs, with Tl being an exception in mosquito coil samples, accounting for 50% of the total HMs. The mass-normalized oxidative potential (OP) of the indoor sources (0.87 - 8.84 pmol/min/μg) was lower than that of biomass burning, vehicle exhaust, and ambient PM, although OP rankings differed from those of PAHs and HMs. Water-soluble organic matter contributed 10.1-95.5% to OP across different sources. The yield ratio of TPM from cigarette sidestream smoke (SS) to mainstream smoke (MS) was 0.50, contrasting with those of HMs (0.71), PAHs (5.46), and OP (0.31). A negative correlation was observed between OP yields in MS and SS, while PAHs yield showed a positive correlation; no correlation was detected for TPM or HMs yield. These results indicate that employing different evaluation metrics to assess the health hazards of particles emitted from the combustion of indoor non-energy combustibles may yield divergent outcomes.
室内非能源燃烧主要目的并非产生能量,却是室内颗粒物的主要来源。本研究分析了蚊香、电蚊拍、艾条、纸钱、香烛、蜡烛及香烟的总颗粒物(TPM)中的多环芳烃(PAHs)、水溶性重金属(HMs)以及基于二硫苏糖醇的氧化潜力(OP)。HMs源自可燃物,而PAHs源于不完全燃烧。具体而言,蜡烛样品中以5环PAHs为主,而其他样品中3 - 4环PAHs更为普遍。Zn、Fe、Ba和Cr是主要的水溶性HMs,不过在电蚊拍样品中Tl是个例外,占总HMs的50%。室内源的质量归一化氧化潜力(OP)(0.87 - 8.84 pmol/min/μg)低于生物质燃烧、汽车尾气及环境颗粒物,尽管OP的排名与PAHs和HMs不同。水溶性有机物对不同来源的OP贡献为10.1 - 95.5%。香烟侧流烟雾(SS)中TPM与主流烟雾(MS)的产率比为0.50,与HMs(0.71)、PAHs(5.46)和OP(0.31)的产率比形成对比。在MS和SS中观察到OP产率之间呈负相关,而PAHs产率呈正相关;TPM或HMs产率未检测到相关性。这些结果表明,采用不同的评估指标来评估室内非能源可燃物燃烧排放颗粒物的健康危害可能会得出不同的结果。