Liu Jiali, Luo Xiaochao, Chen Yemeng, Zhao Ling, Yao Minghong, Yu Jiajie, Yang Jiahui, Li Ling, Sun Xin
Institute of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine and Chinese Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Cochrane China Center and IDEAL China Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
NMPA Key Laboratory for Real World Data Research and Evaluation in Hainan, Chengdu, China.
J Evid Based Med. 2025 Jun;18(2):e70043. doi: 10.1111/jebm.70043.
The demand for high-quality clinical evidence supporting acupuncture remains urgent, necessitating the establishment of a suitable methodological framework to promote its generation.
Following internal deliberations and extensive online discussions with experts in the IDEAL Collaboration, we proposed the IDEAL-Acu framework specifically for acupuncture, based on the surgery-focused IDEAL model with necessary modifications to accommodate the characteristics of acupuncture. To ensure consensus on recommendations, a panel of external experts and internal research team members was convened, and any disagreements were iteratively resolved through expert review.
This article introduces an IDEAL-Acu framework with five stages for evaluating acupuncture outcome and improving practice to optimize treatment. The framework includes Idea (proposal of an acupuncture regime), Development (optimization or standardization of the acupuncture regime), Exploration (feasibility assessment for conducting a definitive RCT), Assessment (evaluation of effects through comparison with standard therapy or sham acupuncture), and Long-term monitoring (examination of long-term efficacy and safety) stages. We provide clear recommendations for each stage along with specific examples.
The framework highlights the importance of conducting studies at each stage in acupuncture evaluation process and can serve as a helpful guide for assessing its effects and promoting evidence-based practice in acupuncture.
对支持针灸的高质量临床证据的需求仍然迫切,因此有必要建立一个合适的方法框架来促进此类证据的产生。
经过内部讨论以及与IDEAL协作组织的专家进行广泛的在线讨论后,我们在以手术为重点的IDEAL模型基础上,提出了专门针对针灸的IDEAL-Acu框架,并进行了必要的修改以适应针灸的特点。为确保对建议达成共识,召集了一个外部专家小组和内部研究团队成员,任何分歧都通过专家评审反复解决。
本文介绍了一个IDEAL-Acu框架,该框架有五个阶段,用于评估针灸效果和改进实践以优化治疗。该框架包括理念(提出针灸方案)、发展(针灸方案的优化或标准化)、探索(进行确定性随机对照试验的可行性评估)、评估(通过与标准治疗或假针灸比较来评估效果)和长期监测(检查长期疗效和安全性)阶段。我们为每个阶段提供了明确的建议以及具体示例。
该框架突出了在针灸评估过程的每个阶段进行研究的重要性,可作为评估针灸效果和促进针灸循证实践的有益指南。