Li Yike, Xie Enmin, Chen Qiang, Gao Yanxiang, Meng Zhen, Yu Changan, Yang Yaliu, Sheng Zhaoxue, Fu Conghan, Du Limei, Pang Wenyue, Chen Mulei, Zheng Jingang
Department of Cardiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital (Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100029, China.
Department of Cardiology, Cardiometabolic Medicine Center, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100037, China.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2025 Jun 10. doi: 10.1007/s10557-025-07720-2.
The utilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) following myocardial infarction (MI) is substantiated by evidence derived from trials conducted during the thrombolysis era. However, limited evidence suggests that ACEI/ARB confer benefits to patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Notably, these studies typically exclude patients undergoing regular dialysis. In this study, we examined the association between the use of ACEI/ARB and the 5-year outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) who are on regular dialysis and possess preserved left ventricular function.
This multicenter retrospective study enrolled a total of 1249 dialysis patients diagnosed with coronary heart disease (CAD). A total of 603 patients meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were analyzed.
The mean age of the cohort was 61.7 years, with 70.6% being male; 313 (51.9%) patients were treated with ACEI/ARB. Over a 5-year follow-up period, the use of ACEI/ARB had no benefit on the composite outcome of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (31.3% vs. 29.0%, p = 0.988). However, ACEI/ARBs reduced mortality across all causes (24.9% vs. 33.1%, p = 0.012) and cardiovascular deaths (14.7% vs. 21.4%, p = 0.015). Furthermore, ACEI/ARB demonstrated a more pronounced cardiovascular mortality benefit in patients with poorer left ventricular function (LVEF 50-60%).
In dialysis patients with ACS and preserved left ventricular function, ACEI/ARB reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, a more pronounced survival benefit is observed in patients with impaired LVEF (50-60%). However, no benefit was found regarding MACE.
心肌梗死(MI)后使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)的依据来源于溶栓时代进行的试验所获得的证据。然而,有限的证据表明ACEI/ARB对左心室射血分数(LVEF)保留的患者有益。值得注意的是,这些研究通常排除接受定期透析的患者。在本研究中,我们探讨了在接受定期透析且左心室功能保留的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者中,使用ACEI/ARB与5年预后之间的关联。
这项多中心回顾性研究共纳入1249例诊断为冠心病(CAD)的透析患者。对符合纳入和排除标准的603例患者进行了分析。
该队列的平均年龄为61.7岁,男性占70.6%;313例(51.9%)患者接受了ACEI/ARB治疗。在5年的随访期内,使用ACEI/ARB对主要不良心血管事件(MACE)的复合结局无益处(31.3%对29.0%,p = 0.988)。然而,ACEI/ARB降低了全因死亡率(24.9%对33.1%,p = 0.012)和心血管死亡率(14.7%对21.4%,p = 0.015)。此外,ACEI/ARB在左心室功能较差(LVEF 50 - 60%)的患者中显示出更显著的心血管死亡率获益。
在患有ACS且左心室功能保留的透析患者中,ACEI/ARB可降低全因死亡率和心血管死亡率。此外,在LVEF受损(50 - 60%)的患者中观察到更显著的生存获益。然而,未发现使用ACEI/ARB对MACE有益。