• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超短脉冲和短脉冲电休克治疗的相对疗效及副作用概况:近期文献的系统评价

The Relative Efficacy and Side-Effect Profile of Ultrabrief Pulse and Brief Pulse ECT: A Systematic Review of Recent Literature.

作者信息

Gonuguntla Rishi, Dunham Sam, Benmaman Isaac, Gonuguntla Neha, Ha Kevin

机构信息

From the Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, WA.

Department of Psychiatry, UT Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, UT.

出版信息

J ECT. 2025 Jun 9. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000001164.

DOI:10.1097/YCT.0000000000001164
PMID:40493775
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an interventional psychiatric technique used primarily to address treatment resistant psychiatric disorders. There are many different stimulus electrode placements and pulse widths utilized in the administration of this therapy, but it is presently unclear which is optimal. The aim of this study is to assess the relative efficacy and side-effect profile of ultrabrief pulse width ECT (UBP ECT) and brief-pulse width ECT (BP ECT) in the treatment of major depressive disorders.

METHOD

A systematic review of the literature was performed. Studies were identified from PubMed, MEDLINE and PsycINFO between January 2013 to October 2023. The final search terms included ECT, depression, brief pulse, and ultrabrief pulse.

RESULTS

The search initially included 64 studies. Forty-three of these studies were not duplicates, after applying exclusion criteria 11 studies were included. UBP ECT was found to have fewer cognitive side effects than BP ECT. Additionally, patients undergoing BP ECT were found to discontinue treatment more frequently due to inability to tolerate side effects. Despite this, BP ECT may have higher rates of symptom remission than UBP ECT. Further studies should be done to clarify the outcomes of each technique.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence slightly favors UBP ECT due to its beneficial side effect profile compared to BP ECT while it has a similar efficacy. However, there is insubstantial evidence in the current body of literature. Additional studies are required to determine which of these techniques is safer and more efficacious in the treatment of major depressive disorders.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

摘要

目的

电休克治疗(ECT)是一种主要用于治疗难治性精神障碍的介入性精神科技术。在这种治疗的实施过程中,使用了许多不同的刺激电极放置方式和脉冲宽度,但目前尚不清楚哪种是最佳的。本研究的目的是评估超短脉冲宽度电休克治疗(UBP ECT)和短脉冲宽度电休克治疗(BP ECT)在治疗重度抑郁症方面的相对疗效和副作用情况。

方法

对文献进行系统综述。从2013年1月至2023年10月期间的PubMed、MEDLINE和PsycINFO中检索相关研究。最终的检索词包括ECT、抑郁症、短脉冲和超短脉冲。

结果

初步检索到64项研究。其中43项研究不重复,应用排除标准后纳入11项研究。发现UBP ECT的认知副作用比BP ECT少。此外,接受BP ECT治疗的患者因无法耐受副作用而更频繁地中断治疗。尽管如此,BP ECT的症状缓解率可能比UBP ECT高。应进行进一步研究以明确每种技术的结果。

结论

目前的证据略微支持UBP ECT,因为与BP ECT相比,其副作用情况较好,且疗效相似。然而,目前的文献证据不足。需要更多研究来确定这两种技术中哪种在治疗重度抑郁症时更安全、更有效。

研究设计

系统综述。

相似文献

1
The Relative Efficacy and Side-Effect Profile of Ultrabrief Pulse and Brief Pulse ECT: A Systematic Review of Recent Literature.超短脉冲和短脉冲电休克治疗的相对疗效及副作用概况:近期文献的系统评价
J ECT. 2025 Jun 9. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000001164.
2
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Brief Versus Ultrabrief Right Unilateral Electroconvulsive Therapy for Depression.简短与超简短右侧单侧电休克治疗抑郁症的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Psychiatry. 2015 Sep;76(9):e1092-8. doi: 10.4088/JCP.14r09145.
3
Efficacy of ultrabrief pulse electroconvulsive therapy for depression: a systematic review.超短脉冲电惊厥疗法治疗抑郁症的疗效:系统评价。
J Affect Disord. 2013 Sep 25;150(3):720-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.05.072. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
4
A review of ultrabrief pulse width electroconvulsive therapy.超短脉冲宽度电抽搐治疗的综述。
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2012 Mar;3(2):69-85. doi: 10.1177/2040622311432493.
5
Relapse and long-term cognitive performance after brief pulse or ultrabrief pulse right unilateral electroconvulsive therapy: A multicenter naturalistic follow up.短暂脉冲或超短暂脉冲右侧单侧电休克治疗后的复发及长期认知表现:一项多中心自然随访研究
J Affect Disord. 2015 Sep 15;184:137-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 May 16.
6
Effects of pulse width and electrode placement on the efficacy and cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy.脉宽和电极放置对电抽搐治疗效果和认知影响的作用。
Brain Stimul. 2008 Apr;1(2):71-83. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.03.001.
7
Brief vs. ultrabrief pulse ECT: focus on seizure quality.短脉冲与超短脉冲 ECT:关注痫性发作质量。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018 Dec;268(8):831-838. doi: 10.1007/s00406-018-0925-z. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
8
Cognitive effects of brief and ultrabrief pulse bitemporal electroconvulsive therapy: a randomised controlled proof-of-concept trial.双颞部短脉冲和超短脉冲电惊厥治疗的认知效果:一项随机对照概念验证试验。
Psychol Med. 2020 May;50(7):1121-1128. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719000989. Epub 2019 May 2.
9
Speed of response in ultrabrief and brief pulse width right unilateral ECT.超短脉冲宽度和短脉冲宽度右侧单侧电惊厥治疗的反应速度。
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013 May;16(4):755-61. doi: 10.1017/S1461145712000806. Epub 2012 Sep 11.
10
Autobiographical and subjective memory with right unilateral high-dose 0.3-millisecond ultrabrief-pulse and 1-millisecond brief-pulse electroconvulsive therapy: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial.右侧单侧大剂量 0.3 毫秒超短脉冲和 1 毫秒短脉冲电惊厥治疗的自传体和主观记忆:一项双盲、随机对照试验。
J ECT. 2013 Dec;29(4):277-82. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0b013e3182941baf.