• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项新开发的针对慢性病老年患者照料者的财务准备计划的可接受性与满意度。

Acceptability and satisfaction of a newly developed financial preparedness program for caregivers of older adults with a chronic illness.

作者信息

Judge Katherine, Stratton Lauren, Grant Claire, Moreno Monica, Fazio Sam

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.

Center for Research and Education, Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2025 Aug 4;65(8). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf148.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnaf148
PMID:40493798
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12398386/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To address a gap in caregiver programming focused on financial literacy and preparedness, Managing Money: A Caregiver's Guide to Finances, a 1-hour online program, was evaluated to determine program acceptability and participant satisfaction.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Caregivers of individuals with chronic health conditions were recruited to attend a one-hour program focused on (1) understanding the financial impact of caregiving; (2) providing information on legal and financial documents; (3) how to prepare for discussions about finances and financial planning; (4) lowering risks of financial abuse and fraud; and (5) creating a backup plan for changes in care needs. Results were collected longitudinally, following participants to ninety days after attending the program.

RESULTS

Overall, participants (n = 99) found the program highly acceptable, with the majority of caregivers agreeing or strongly agreeing the program: identified financial issues; provided important information; content was easy to read and understand; topics were clear and well-organized; activities were helpful; length was good; and caregivers would recommend the program. Program materials were rated helpful with up to 40% of participants reporting they used materials after attending the program.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Providing care for individuals with chronic health conditions poses significant challenges for informal caregivers. The impact of finances, knowledge base, and skills needed are often not included in an in-depth manner. The current program addresses this gap while also taking into consideration the need to develop pragmatic and scalable programs. The program may be useful in developing other targeted intervention protocols for caregivers.

摘要

背景与目标

为填补护理人员培训中在金融知识和准备方面的空白,对一个名为“管理金钱:护理人员财务指南”的1小时在线课程进行了评估,以确定课程的可接受性和参与者满意度。

研究设计与方法

招募患有慢性健康状况个体的护理人员参加一个1小时的课程,该课程重点关注:(1)理解护理的财务影响;(2)提供法律和财务文件方面的信息;(3)如何为财务讨论和财务规划做准备;(4)降低金融虐待和欺诈风险;(5)为护理需求变化制定备用计划。在参与者参加课程后的90天内纵向收集结果。

结果

总体而言,参与者(n = 99)认为该课程非常可接受,大多数护理人员同意或强烈同意该课程:识别了财务问题;提供了重要信息;内容易于阅读和理解;主题清晰且组织良好;活动有帮助;时长合适;护理人员会推荐该课程。课程材料被评为有帮助,多达40%的参与者报告他们在参加课程后使用了材料。

讨论与启示

为患有慢性健康状况的个体提供护理给非正式护理人员带来了重大挑战。财务影响、所需的知识基础和技能往往没有得到深入涵盖。当前的课程填补了这一空白,同时也考虑到了开发实用且可扩展课程的必要性。该课程可能有助于为护理人员制定其他有针对性的干预方案。

相似文献

1
Acceptability and satisfaction of a newly developed financial preparedness program for caregivers of older adults with a chronic illness.一项新开发的针对慢性病老年患者照料者的财务准备计划的可接受性与满意度。
Gerontologist. 2025 Aug 4;65(8). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaf148.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Acceptability of a Web-Based Financial Education Intervention for Latino Caregivers: Mixed Methods Evaluation.针对拉丁裔照顾者的基于网络的金融教育干预措施的可接受性:混合方法评估
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 15;9:e70471. doi: 10.2196/70471.
4
Interventions for patients and caregivers to improve knowledge of sickle cell disease and recognition of its related complications.针对患者及护理人员的干预措施,以提高对镰状细胞病的认识及其相关并发症的识别能力。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 6;10(10):CD011175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011175.pub2.
5
GamePlan4Care, a Web-Based Adaptation of the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health II Intervention for Family Caregivers of Persons Living With Dementia: Formative, Qualitative Usability Testing Study.GamePlan4Care,一种基于网络的针对痴呆症患者家庭照顾者的增强阿尔茨海默病照顾者健康II干预资源改编版:形成性、定性可用性测试研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 11;9:e60143. doi: 10.2196/60143.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
Acceptability of an Intervention to Prevent Older Adult Mistreatment Among Family Caregivers to Persons With Dementia: Multimethod Pilot Study.一项针对痴呆症患者家庭照顾者预防老年人虐待的干预措施的可接受性:多方法试点研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 30;9:e73778. doi: 10.2196/73778.
8
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
9
Informal caregivers' burden and chronic pain in older adults: a dyadic study unveiling the correlation and its impact.老年人非正式照料者的负担与慢性疼痛:一项揭示相关性及其影响的二元研究
Pain Manag. 2025 Mar;15(3):123-130. doi: 10.1080/17581869.2025.2467614. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
10
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring confidence in financial planning topics among care partners of persons living with dementia.探索痴呆症患者护理者在财务规划主题方面的信心。
Dementia (London). 2024 Nov;23(8):1307-1326. doi: 10.1177/14713012241270730. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
2
Acceptability and Effectiveness of a Dementia-Care Program Delivered by Community-Based Agency Staff.社区机构工作人员提供的痴呆症护理计划的可接受性和有效性。
Gerontologist. 2024 Aug 1;64(8). doi: 10.1093/geront/gnae045.
3
Financial, Legal, and Functional Challenges of Providing Care for People Living With Dementia and Needs for a Digital Platform: Interview Study Among Family Caregivers.为痴呆症患者提供护理的财务、法律和功能挑战以及对数字平台的需求:家庭照顾者访谈研究
JMIR Aging. 2023 Sep 5;6:e47577. doi: 10.2196/47577.
4
Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the adapted Namaste Care program delivered by caregivers of community-dwelling older persons with moderate to advanced dementia: a mixed methods feasibility study.适应型 Namaste Care 方案由社区居住的中重度至重度痴呆老年人的照护者实施的可行性、可接受性和初步效果:一项混合方法可行性研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Oct 13;22(1):797. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03483-9.
5
Caregiving-Related Work Productivity Loss Among Employed Family and Other Unpaid Caregivers of Older Adults.照顾老年人的家庭和其他无酬照顾者的与照顾相关的工作生产力损失。
Value Health. 2023 May;26(5):712-720. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2022.06.014. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
6
Needs of carers participating in support groups and caring for a person with dementia: A focused ethnographic study.照顾者参与支持小组照顾痴呆症患者的需求:一项聚焦民族志研究。
Dementia (London). 2022 May;21(4):1219-1232. doi: 10.1177/14713012211072928. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
7
Online Educational Tools for Caregivers of People with Dementia: A Scoping Literature Review.痴呆症患者照顾者的在线教育工具:一项范围界定文献综述
Can Geriatr J. 2021 Dec 1;24(4):351-366. doi: 10.5770/cgj.24.506. eCollection 2021 Dec.
8
Addressing the Diverse Needs of Unpaid Caregivers Through New Health-Care Policy Opportunities.通过新的医疗政策机遇满足无偿护理者的多样化需求。
Public Policy Aging Rep. 2020 Dec 21;31(1):19-23. doi: 10.1093/ppar/praa039. eCollection 2021.
9
Caregiver burden: A concept analysis.照顾者负担:一项概念分析。
Int J Nurs Sci. 2020 Jul 25;7(4):438-445. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.07.012. eCollection 2020 Oct 10.
10
Why do family dementia caregivers reject caregiver support services? Analyzing types of rejection and associated health-impairments in a cluster-randomized controlled intervention trial.为什么家庭痴呆症照顾者拒绝照顾者支持服务?在一项集群随机对照干预试验中分析拒绝的类型和相关的健康损害。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 14;20(1):121. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4970-8.