Thielen Jordy
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2025 Jun 19;11(4). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/ade316.
This study investigated the presence of brain-computer interface (BCI) inefficiency in BCIs using the code-modulated visual evoked potential (c-VEP). It further explored neurophysiological predictors of performance variability and evaluated a wide range of binary stimulus sequences in terms of classification accuracy and user comfort, aiming to identify strategies to mitigate c-VEP BCI inefficiency.In a comprehensive empirical analysis, ten different binary stimulus sequences were offline evaluated. These sequences included five code families (m-sequence, de Bruijn sequence, Golay sequence, Gold code, and a Gold code set), each in original and modulated form. To identify predictors of performance variability, resting-state alpha activity, heart rate and heart rate variability, sustained attention, and flash-VEP characteristics were studied.Results confirmed substantial inter-individual variability in c-VEP BCI efficiency. While all participants reached a near-perfect classification accuracy, their obtained speed varied substantially. Four flash-VEP features were found to significantly correlate with the observed performance varibility: the N2 latency, the P2 latency and amplitude, and the N3 amplitude. Among the tested stimulus conditions, the m-sequence emerged as the best-performing universal stimulus. However, tailoring stimulus selection to individuals led to significant improvements in performance. Cross-decoding was successful between modulated stimulus conditions, but showed challenges when generalizing across other stimulus conditions. Lastly, while overall comfort ratings were comparable across conditions, stimulus modulation was associated with a significant decrease in user comfort.This study challenges the assumption of universal efficiency in c-VEP BCIs. The findings highlight the importance of accounting for individual neurophysiological differences and underscore the need for personalized stimulus protocols and decoding strategies to enhance both performance and user comfort.
本研究调查了使用编码调制视觉诱发电位(c-VEP)的脑机接口(BCI)中存在的效率低下问题。它进一步探索了性能变异性的神经生理学预测指标,并从分类准确性和用户舒适度方面评估了广泛的二元刺激序列,旨在确定减轻c-VEP BCI效率低下的策略。在一项全面的实证分析中,对十种不同的二元刺激序列进行了离线评估。这些序列包括五个编码家族(m序列、德布鲁因序列、戈莱序列、Gold码和一组Gold码),每个家族都有原始形式和调制形式。为了确定性能变异性的预测指标,研究了静息状态下的α活动、心率和心率变异性、持续注意力以及闪光VEP特征。结果证实,c-VEP BCI效率存在显著的个体间差异。虽然所有参与者都达到了近乎完美的分类准确性,但他们获得的速度差异很大。发现四个闪光VEP特征与观察到的性能变异性显著相关:N2潜伏期、P2潜伏期和振幅以及N3振幅。在测试的刺激条件中,m序列成为表现最佳的通用刺激。然而,根据个体情况定制刺激选择可显著提高性能。在调制刺激条件之间交叉解码是成功的,但在跨其他刺激条件进行推广时显示出挑战。最后,虽然各条件下的总体舒适度评分相当,但刺激调制与用户舒适度的显著下降有关。本研究对c-VEP BCI普遍效率的假设提出了挑战。研究结果强调了考虑个体神经生理差异的重要性,并强调了需要个性化的刺激方案和解码策略来提高性能和用户舒适度。