• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替罗非班联合治疗急性缺血性卒中:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Tirofiban Combination Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Kamran Abdullah Bin, Khalil Ahmed Bazil Bin, Muhammad Ayesha, Arshad Hira, Nazir Fatima, Ali Muhammad Mateen, Umar M Mairaj, Farhan Muhammad, Alam Sudhair, Iqbal Javed

机构信息

Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.

Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical College, Lyari, Pakistan.

出版信息

Brain Behav. 2025 Jun;15(6):e70508. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70508.

DOI:10.1002/brb3.70508
PMID:40495442
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Standard antiplatelet therapies, while partially effective, do not fully inhibit all pathways of platelet aggregation, leaving patients at risk of recurrent thrombotic events. Tirofiban, a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor, has shown promise as an adjunctive treatment in AIS.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane library from inception to July 2024, following PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria comprised randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies where tirofiban was used as an adjunct to standard antiplatelet therapy. Primary outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and favorable modified Rankin scale (mRS) scores at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and all-cause mortality. Data was analyzed using Review Manager v5.4.1, with random-effects models employed for all outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies, comprising 4,457 patients, were included. Tirofiban significantly improved the likelihood of achieving favorable mRS scores (OR 1.65, 95% CI [1.29, 2.11], p = 0.0001), with moderate heterogeneity (I = 57%, p = 0.006). Tirofiban also significantly reduced NIHSS scores (MD -2.08, 95% CI [-2.77, -1.39], p < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of sICH between the tirofiban and control groups.

CONCLUSION

Tirofiban as an adjunct to standard antiplatelet therapy in AIS patients significantly improves functional outcomes and reduces neurological impairment without increasing the risk of sICH.

摘要

引言

急性缺血性卒中(AIS)是全球发病和死亡的主要原因。标准抗血小板治疗虽有部分疗效,但不能完全抑制血小板聚集的所有途径,使患者有复发性血栓事件的风险。替罗非班是一种糖蛋白IIb/IIIa受体抑制剂,已显示出作为AIS辅助治疗的潜力。

方法

按照PRISMA指南,从创刊至2024年7月在PubMed、ClinicalTrials.gov和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面检索。纳入标准包括将替罗非班用作标准抗血小板治疗辅助药物的随机对照试验(RCT)和比较观察性研究。主要结局包括90天时的症状性颅内出血(sICH)和改良Rankin量表(mRS)良好评分。次要结局包括美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分和全因死亡率。使用Review Manager v5.4.1进行数据分析,所有结局均采用随机效应模型。

结果

纳入15项研究,共4457例患者。替罗非班显著提高了获得良好mRS评分的可能性(OR 1.65,95%CI[1.29,2.11],p = 0.0001),异质性中等(I² = 57%,p = 0.006)。替罗非班还显著降低了NIHSS评分(MD -2.08,95%CI[-2.77,-1.39],p < 0.00001)。替罗非班组和对照组之间sICH的发生率没有显著差异。

结论

在AIS患者中,替罗非班作为标准抗血小板治疗的辅助药物可显著改善功能结局并减少神经功能损害,而不会增加sICH的风险。

相似文献

1
Tirofiban Combination Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.替罗非班联合治疗急性缺血性卒中:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Brain Behav. 2025 Jun;15(6):e70508. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70508.
2
Efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban versus standard medical treatment in acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.静脉注射替罗非班与急性缺血性脑卒中标准治疗的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;247:108602. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108602. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
3
Efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban combined with reperfusion therapy versus reperfusion therapy alone in acute ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.急性缺血性卒中患者静脉注射替罗非班联合再灌注治疗与单纯再灌注治疗的疗效及安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Apr;58(4):526-537. doi: 10.1007/s11239-025-03094-2. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
4
Tirofiban for acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis.替罗非班治疗急性缺血性脑卒中:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 Apr;76(4):475-481. doi: 10.1007/s00228-019-02817-8. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
5
Effects of Oral Antiplatelet Agents and Tirofiban on Functional Outcomes of Patients with Non-Disabling Minor Acute Ischemic Stroke.口服抗血小板药物和替罗非班对非致残性小急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能结局的影响。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Aug;29(8):104829. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.104829. Epub 2020 May 21.
6
Tirofiban vs. aspirin in patients with acute ischemic stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.替罗非班与阿司匹林治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Dec;247:108626. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108626. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
7
Intravenous Thrombolysis Plus Tirofiban in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急性缺血性卒中患者静脉溶栓联合替罗非班治疗:一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Emerg Med. 2025 Jun;73:102-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.12.007. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
8
Tirofiban on First-Pass Recanalization in Acute Stroke Endovascular Thrombectomy: The OPTIMISTIC Randomized Clinical Trial.替罗非班用于急性卒中血管内血栓切除术首次通过再通:OPTIMISTIC随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255308. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5308.
9
Safety and efficacy of tirofiban treatment in the endovascular treatment of patients with acute ischaemic stroke - A meta-analysis.替罗非班治疗急性缺血性脑卒中血管内治疗患者的安全性和有效性 - 一项荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Aug;243:108330. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108330. Epub 2024 May 17.
10
Early tirofiban administration for patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis or bridging therapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis.早期替罗非班给药用于接受静脉溶栓或桥接治疗的急性缺血性脑卒中患者:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;222:107449. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2022.107449. Epub 2022 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of tirofiban in the management of stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.替罗非班治疗脑卒中的安全性和有效性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2023 Sep;232:107867. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107867. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
2
Association of Tirofiban With Functional Outcomes After Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease.替罗非班与颅内动脉粥样硬化性疾病所致急性缺血性脑卒中血管内取栓术后功能结局的相关性。
Neurology. 2023 May 9;100(19):e1996-e2006. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207194. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
3
Antiplatelet Therapy Aims and Strategies in Asian Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome or Stable Coronary Artery Disease.
亚洲急性冠状动脉综合征或稳定型冠状动脉疾病患者的抗血小板治疗目标与策略
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 15;11(24):7440. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247440.
4
Management of Acute Stroke Among Lebanese Patients: Assessing Adherence to International Guidelines.黎巴嫩患者急性脑卒中管理:评估对国际指南的依从性。
Curr Drug Saf. 2023;18(4):555-562. doi: 10.2174/1574886318666221118151504.
5
Prospective pilot study of tirofiban in progressive stroke after intravenous thrombolysis.替罗非班用于静脉溶栓后进展性卒中的前瞻性试点研究。
Front Neurol. 2022 Oct 4;13:982684. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.982684. eCollection 2022.
6
The Efficacy and Safety of Ischemic Stroke Therapies: An Umbrella Review.缺血性中风治疗的疗效与安全性:一项伞状综述
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 22;13:924747. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.924747. eCollection 2022.
7
Contemporary antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention: a narrative review of current literature and guidelines.当代抗血小板治疗用于二级卒中预防:对当前文献和指南的叙述性综述。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2022 Oct;7(5):406-414. doi: 10.1136/svn-2021-001166. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
8
Efficacy and Safety of Tirofiban in Clinical Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.替罗非班在急性缺血性脑卒中临床患者中的疗效与安全性
Front Neurol. 2022 Feb 8;12:785836. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.785836. eCollection 2021.
9
Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor and Aspirin in Patients With Moderate Ischemic Stroke: An Exploratory Analysis of the THALES Randomized Clinical Trial.替格瑞洛和阿司匹林治疗中度缺血性脑卒中患者的疗效和安全性:THALES 随机临床试验的探索性分析。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Sep 1;78(9):1091-1098. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.2440.
10
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.