Vaglum P, Friis S, Karterud S
Yale J Biol Med. 1985 Jul-Aug;58(4):349-61.
The results of milieu therapy with psychotic patients have been highly conflicting because of unrecognized differences among the wards investigated. Our own research indicates that for psychotic patients in short- and intermediate-term wards: A beneficial milieu has a low perceived level of anger and aggression and a high level of support, practical orientation, and order and organization. Confronting group therapy is detrimental and individually oriented milieu therapy beneficial. Community groups may become anti-therapeutic pseudo-groups. Extensive use of confrontational groups may contribute to a detrimental ward atmosphere. A high mean age of patients may contribute to a favorable low level of aggression. A high percentage of psychotic patients, a high number of patients, and a high staff turnover may lead to a detrimental atmosphere. On this basis we tried to change the milieu on a 26-bed therapeutic community ward which proved to have pseudo-groups and a detrimental ward atmosphere. The amount of compulsory group activities was reduced, the groups made more task-oriented, the amount of individually oriented milieu therapy increased, and the number of beds reduced. At re-evaluation the ward atmosphere had improved considerably.
由于所调查的病房之间存在未被认识到的差异,对精神病患者进行环境治疗的结果一直存在很大争议。我们自己的研究表明,对于短期和中期病房中的精神病患者:有益的环境具有较低的愤怒和攻击感,以及较高的支持、实际导向、秩序和组织水平。对抗性团体治疗有害,而个体导向的环境治疗有益。社区团体可能会变成反治疗性的伪团体。大量使用对抗性团体可能会导致有害的病房氛围。患者的平均年龄较高可能有助于营造有利的低攻击水平氛围。高比例的精神病患者、大量患者以及高员工流动率可能会导致有害氛围。在此基础上,我们试图改变一个有26张床位的治疗社区病房的环境,该病房被证明存在伪团体和有害的病房氛围。强制团体活动的数量减少,团体更注重任务导向,个体导向的环境治疗数量增加,床位数量减少。在重新评估时,病房氛围有了显著改善。