Lim Kai Yuan, Spencer Elizabeth, Bogart Elise, Steel Joanne
The University of Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Commun Disord. 2025 Jul-Aug;116:106540. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2025.106540. Epub 2025 May 31.
Spoken discourse is elicited as part of speech-language pathology (SLP) practice after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Research literature reports on a range of monologic tasks for eliciting discourse samples, including different visual stimuli. The preferences of SLPs for these materials has not previously been investigated.
To explore the practice and views of SLPs on available visual discourse elicitation stimuli, specifically the clinical utility and acceptability of these tasks, and alignment with materials reported in research studies. We also sought SLPs' perspectives on future discourse elicitation task development.
METHODS & PROCEDURES: We conducted a survey of Australian SLPs working with adults with cognitive-communication disorder post TBI. SLPs were asked about their use of and preferences around visual imagery, client engagement with visuals, and their suggestions for future stimuli development. Survey responses were analysed using descriptive statistics, and free text responses provided qualitative insights.
OUTCOMES & RESULTS: Responses from 17 SLPs were included in the study. SLPs reported The Cookie Theft picture as the most frequently used visual stimulus. Reasons for use included familiarity with the task, ability to generate sample of sufficient length and complexity, and its accessibility. There were no strong preferences for any visual materials reported in this survey; however, overall, participants reported finding the existing visual materials to be unsatisfactory. Factors affecting choice of visual stimuli included the client's visual abilities, interests, age-group, and severity of injury.
CONCLUSION & IMPLICATIONS: This exploratory study provided insight into SLPs' views on visual elicitation stimuli for discourse post-TBI, a largely unexamined area. The current findings contribute to limited knowledge of stakeholder views on elicitation tasks and will inform future research on discourse resource development after TBI.
创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后,言语语篇作为言语语言病理学(SLP)实践的一部分被引出。研究文献报道了一系列用于引出语篇样本的独白任务,包括不同的视觉刺激。此前尚未对言语语言病理学家对这些材料的偏好进行调查。
探讨言语语言病理学家对可用的视觉语篇引出刺激的实践和看法,特别是这些任务的临床效用和可接受性,以及与研究报告中的材料的一致性。我们还征求了言语语言病理学家对未来语篇引出任务开发的看法。
我们对与创伤性脑损伤后患有认知交流障碍的成年人一起工作的澳大利亚言语语言病理学家进行了一项调查。言语语言病理学家被问及他们对视觉图像的使用和偏好、客户对视觉材料的参与度,以及他们对未来刺激开发的建议。使用描述性统计分析调查回复,并对自由文本回复提供定性见解。
17名言语语言病理学家的回复被纳入研究。言语语言病理学家报告称,《偷饼干》图片是最常用的视觉刺激。使用的原因包括对任务的熟悉程度、生成足够长度和复杂度样本的能力以及其可及性。本次调查中没有对任何视觉材料有强烈偏好;然而,总体而言,参与者报告发现现有的视觉材料不尽人意。影响视觉刺激选择的因素包括客户的视觉能力、兴趣、年龄组和损伤严重程度。
这项探索性研究深入了解了言语语言病理学家对创伤性脑损伤后语篇视觉引出刺激的看法,这是一个基本上未被研究的领域。目前的研究结果有助于增加对利益相关者对引出任务看法的有限认识,并将为未来创伤性脑损伤后语篇资源开发的研究提供信息。