Cognitive Lab: A dataset of biosignals and HCI features for cognitive process investigation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Attention, cognitive workload/fatigue, and emotional states significantly influence learning outcomes, cognitive performance, and human-machine interactions. However, existing assessment methodologies fail to fully capture the multimodal nature of these cognitive processes, limiting their application in adaptive learning environments. This study presents the Cognitive Lab, a comprehensive multimodal dataset designed to investigate these cognitive processes across real-time learning scenarios. Specifically, it aims to capture and enable the classification of (1) attention and cognitive workload states using standard cognitive tasks, (2) cognitive fatigue arising from prolonged digital activities, and (3) emotional and learning states during interactive lessons.

METHODS

The Cognitive Lab dataset consists of three distinct subsets, each developed through specific experimental scenarios targeting different aspects of learning. Dataset 1 comprises recordings from eight participants performing N-Back and mental subtraction tasks, aimed at assessing attention and cognitive workload. Dataset 2 includes data from 10 participants engaged in a digital lesson, complemented by Corsi block-tapping and concentration tasks, to evaluate cognitive fatigue. Lastly, Dataset 3 captures data from 18 participants during an interactive Jupyter Notebook lesson, focusing on emotional states and learning processes. Each scenario combined biosignals (accelerometry, ECG, EDA, EEG, fNIRS, respiration) with Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) features (mouse-tracking, keyboard activity, screenshots). Machine learning models were applied to classify cognitive states, with cross-validation ensuring robust results.

RESULTS

The dataset enabled accurate classification of learning states, achieving up to 87% accuracy in differentiating learning states using mouse-tracking data. Furthermore, it successfully differentiated attention, cognitive workload, and cognitive fatigue states using biosignal and HCI data, with fNIRS, EEG, and ECG emerging as key contributors to classification performance. Variability across participants highlighted the potential for subject-specific calibration to enhance model accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

The Cognitive Lab dataset represents a resource for investigating cognitive phenomena in real-world learning scenarios. Its integration of biosignals and HCI features enables the classification of cognitive states and supports advancements in adaptive learning systems, cognitive neuroscience, and brain-computer interface technologies.