• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

印度尼西亚医院外科团队对手术安全核对表实施情况的看法:一项描述性定性研究

Surgical team perceptions of the surgical safety checklist implementation in Indonesian hospitals: a descriptive qualitative study.

作者信息

Dhamanti Inge, Pratiwi Ika Nur, Miftahussurur Muhammad, Sholikhah Vina Himmatus, Yakub Fitri

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Administration, Universitas Airlangga Fakultas Kesehatan Masyarakat, Surabaya, Jawa Timur, Indonesia

Center of Excellence for Patient Safety and Quality, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 10;15(6):e089013. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089013.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089013
PMID:40499963
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12161326/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The surgical safety checklist (SSC) is designed to improve the safety of surgical procedures, reduce avoidable complications and deaths and foster better communication and collaboration among healthcare providers. Despite the global acceptance of the initiative, there is limited comprehensive research on the challenges, success factors, impact and the role of professional organisations in SSC implementation in Indonesia. This study aimed to explore the implementation of SSC in Indonesia by investigating the challenges, success factors, impact and role of professional organisations in SSC implementation in Indonesia based on the perspective of the surgical team.

METHOD

This descriptive qualitative study, part of a larger research project, employed purposive sampling to select 13 interview participants from surgical teams across hospitals with varying ownership structures, as well as members of surgical-related professional organisations. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Participants acknowledged the positive impact of SSC on patient safety; however, challenges such as compliance issues, teamwork dynamics and unsafe behaviour persisted. Key success factors included strong organisational and policy support at the institutional level, including hospital accreditation, educational programmes, safety and quality committees, regular audits and workload management. However, professional organisations in Indonesia have not played a significant role in promoting SSC.

CONCLUSION

Effective SSC implementation strategies must target the micro, meso and macro levels for comprehensive success. Future research should prioritise overcoming barriers and harnessing the influence of professional organisations to standardise SSC practices, ultimately enhancing patient safety across healthcare settings.

摘要

引言

手术安全核对表(SSC)旨在提高手术程序的安全性,减少可避免的并发症和死亡,并促进医疗服务提供者之间更好的沟通与协作。尽管该倡议在全球得到认可,但关于印度尼西亚在实施SSC过程中的挑战、成功因素、影响以及专业组织的作用,全面的研究仍然有限。本研究旨在从手术团队的角度,通过调查印度尼西亚在实施SSC过程中的挑战、成功因素、影响以及专业组织的作用,来探索SSC在印度尼西亚的实施情况。

方法

本描述性定性研究是一个更大研究项目的一部分,采用目的抽样法从不同所有制结构医院的手术团队以及与手术相关的专业组织成员中选取了13名访谈参与者。通过深入访谈收集数据,并使用主题分析法进行分析。

结果

参与者认可SSC对患者安全的积极影响;然而,诸如合规问题、团队协作动态和不安全行为等挑战依然存在。关键成功因素包括机构层面强大的组织和政策支持,包括医院认证、教育项目、安全与质量委员会、定期审计和工作量管理。然而,印度尼西亚的专业组织在推广SSC方面尚未发挥重要作用。

结论

有效的SSC实施策略必须针对微观、中观和宏观层面,以实现全面成功。未来的研究应优先克服障碍,并利用专业组织的影响力来规范SSC实践,最终提高整个医疗环境中的患者安全。

相似文献

1
Surgical team perceptions of the surgical safety checklist implementation in Indonesian hospitals: a descriptive qualitative study.印度尼西亚医院外科团队对手术安全核对表实施情况的看法:一项描述性定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 10;15(6):e089013. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089013.
2
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
Barriers and facilitators for implementing WHO's Surgical Safety Checklist in a publicly funded hospital: a qualitative study from a tertiary-level public hospital in Croatia.在一家公立医院实施世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的障碍与促进因素:来自克罗地亚一家三级公立医院的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 30;15(6):e095155. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095155.
5
Addressing Inequalities in Long Covid Healthcare: A Mixed-Methods Study on Building Inclusive Services.解决长期新冠医疗保健中的不平等问题:一项关于建立包容性服务的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70336. doi: 10.1111/hex.70336.
6
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
7
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
8
Self-management dilemmas and influencing factors of patients during the waiting period for heart transplantation in China based on the social ecosystem: a qualitative study.基于社会生态系统的中国心脏移植等待期患者自我管理困境及影响因素:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 4;15(6):e099231. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099231.
9
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
10
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to Improve Compliance to Surgical Safety Checklist Use: Before-and-After Study at a Tertiary Public Hospital in Croatia.提高手术安全检查表使用依从性的干预措施:克罗地亚一家三级公立医院的前后对照研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 10;13(16):1959. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161959.

本文引用的文献

1
WHO Surgical Safety Checklist compliance rate at a large tertiary hospital in Vietnam.越南一家大型三级医院的世界卫生组织手术安全核对表合规率。
J Perioper Pract. 2024 Sep 13:17504589241268647. doi: 10.1177/17504589241268647.
2
Makkah healthcare cluster response, challenges, and interventions during COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.麦加医疗保健集群在 COVID-19 大流行期间的应对措施、挑战和干预措施:一项定性研究。
J Infect Public Health. 2024 Jun;17(6):975-985. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.04.007. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
3
Patients' perspectives on quality and patient safety failures: lessons learned from an inquiry into transvaginal mesh in Australia.
患者对质量和患者安全失败的看法:从澳大利亚阴道网片调查中吸取的教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):436. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10791-w.
4
Going beyond compliance: A qualitative study of the practice of surgical safety checklist.超越合规:手术安全核查表实践的定性研究
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Mar;345:116652. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116652. Epub 2024 Feb 11.
5
Operating room organization and surgical performance: a systematic review.手术室组织与手术绩效:一项系统综述。
Patient Saf Surg. 2024 Jan 29;18(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s13037-023-00388-3.
6
Improving patient safety governance and systems through learning from successes and failures: qualitative surveys and interviews with international experts.通过从成功和失败中学习来改善患者安全治理和系统:对国际专家的定性调查和访谈。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Nov 17;35(4):0. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad088.
7
Perspectives on Perioperative Team-Based Morbidity and Mortality Conferences: A Mixed Methods Study.围手术期基于团队的发病率和死亡率会议的观点:一项混合方法研究。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2024 Feb;50(2):139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.10.004. Epub 2023 Oct 15.
8
Improving surgical safety checklist utilisation at 23 public health facilities in Ethiopia: a collaborative quality improvement project.提高埃塞俄比亚 23 家公立卫生机构手术安全检查表的使用率:合作质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Nov;12(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002406.
9
Facilitators and barriers to the implementation of surgical safety checklist: an integrative review.手术安全检查表实施的促进因素和障碍:综合评价。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2023 Oct 31;35(4). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad086.
10
Compliance With the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist at a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Closed Loop Audit Study.一家三级护理医院对世界卫生组织手术安全核对表的依从性:一项闭环审计研究。
Cureus. 2023 May 31;15(5):e39808. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39808. eCollection 2023 May.