Suppr超能文献

新辅助化疗后近端胃癌行近端胃切除术联合管状胃重建与全胃切除术:一项多中心回顾性研究。

Proximal gastrectomy with tubular stomach reconstruction total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A multicenter retrospective study.

作者信息

Lu Yi-Ming, Jin Peng, Wang Hai-Kuo, Shao Xin-Xin, Hu Hai-Tao, Jiang Yu-Juan, Li Wang-Yao, Tian Yan-Tao

机构信息

Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.

Department of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 May 27;17(5):107579. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.107579.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is a major global health challenge, and the treatment of proximal GC in particular presents unique clinical and surgical complexities. Currently, there is no consensus on whether proximal gastrectomy (PG) or total gastrectomy (TG) should be used for advanced proximal GC, and the choice of postoperative gastrointestinal reconstruction method remains controversial.

AIM

To compare the short-term efficacy, long-term survival, and postoperative reflux outcomes of PG with tubular stomach reconstruction TG with Roux-en-Y reconstruction in patients with proximal GC following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in an effort to provide valuable insights for clinical decision-making regarding the optimal surgical approach.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at two Chinese medical centers between December, 2012 and December, 2022. Patients with histologically confirmed proximal GC who received NACT followed by either PG with tubular stomach reconstruction or TG with Roux-en-Y reconstruction were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics, and the primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free survival (RFS), postoperative complications, and reflux severity.

RESULTS

After PSM, 244 patients (122 PG, 122 TG) were finally included and all baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The PG group had a significantly shorter operation time compared to the TG group (189.50 215.00 minutes, < 0.001), with no differences in intraoperative blood loss or postoperative complications (19.68% 14.75%, = 0.792). The 5-year OS rates were 52.7% 45.5% ( = 0.330), and 5-year RFS rates were 54.3% 47.6% ( = 0.356) for the PG and TG groups, respectively. Reflux symptoms (18.0% 31.1%, = 0.017) and clinically significant reflux based on gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire scores ≥ 8 (7.4% 21.3%, < 0.001) were significantly less frequent in the PG group. Multivariate analysis identified histological differentiation (HR = 2.98, 95%CI: 2.03-4.36, < 0.001) and tumor size (HR = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.17-0.41 for tumors ≤ 4 cm, < 0.001) as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

PG with tubular stomach reconstruction is comparable to TG in terms of surgical safety and long-term oncological outcomes for proximal GC patients following NACT. Additionally, PG has the advantages of shorter operation time and lower rates of postoperative reflux, suggesting potential benefits for patient quality of life. Notably, the analysis of postoperative prognostic factors, including histological differentiation and tumor size, further informs clinical decision-making and highlights the importance of individualized treatment strategies.

摘要

背景

胃癌是一项重大的全球健康挑战,尤其是近端胃癌的治疗存在独特的临床和手术复杂性。目前,对于晚期近端胃癌应采用近端胃切除术(PG)还是全胃切除术(TG)尚无共识,术后胃肠道重建方法的选择也仍存在争议。

目的

比较新辅助化疗(NACT)后近端胃癌患者接受PG联合管状胃重建与TG联合Roux-en-Y重建的短期疗效、长期生存及术后反流情况,以便为最佳手术方式的临床决策提供有价值的见解。

方法

2012年12月至2022年12月期间在两家中国医疗中心进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究。纳入经组织学确诊的近端胃癌患者,这些患者接受了NACT后行PG联合管状胃重建或TG联合Roux-en-Y重建。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以平衡基线特征,主要终点为5年总生存(OS)。次要终点包括无复发生存(RFS)、术后并发症及反流严重程度。

结果

PSM后,最终纳入244例患者(122例PG,122例TG),两组间所有基线特征具有可比性。与TG组相比,PG组手术时间显著更短(189.50对215.00分钟,P<0.001),术中出血量及术后并发症无差异(19.68%对14.75%,P=0.792)。PG组和TG组的5年OS率分别为52.7%对45.5%(P=0.330),5年RFS率分别为54.3%对47.6%(P=0.356)。PG组的反流症状(18.0%对31.1%,P=0.017)及基于胃食管反流病问卷评分≥8的临床显著反流(7.4%对21.3%,P<0.001)频率显著更低。多因素分析确定组织学分化(HR=2.98,95%CI:2.03-4.36,P<0.001)和肿瘤大小(肿瘤≤4 cm时HR=0.26,95%CI:0.17-0.41,P<0.001)为独立预后因素。

结论

对于NACT后的近端胃癌患者,PG联合管状胃重建在手术安全性和长期肿瘤学结局方面与TG相当。此外,PG具有手术时间短和术后反流率低的优势,提示对患者生活质量有潜在益处。值得注意的是,对术后预后因素的分析,包括组织学分化和肿瘤大小,进一步为临床决策提供依据,并突出了个体化治疗策略的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5914/12149941/de7de38844df/107579-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验