• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新辅助化疗后近端胃癌行近端胃切除术联合管状胃重建与全胃切除术:一项多中心回顾性研究。

Proximal gastrectomy with tubular stomach reconstruction total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A multicenter retrospective study.

作者信息

Lu Yi-Ming, Jin Peng, Wang Hai-Kuo, Shao Xin-Xin, Hu Hai-Tao, Jiang Yu-Juan, Li Wang-Yao, Tian Yan-Tao

机构信息

Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.

Department of Gastric Surgery, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 May 27;17(5):107579. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.107579.

DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.107579
PMID:40502489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12149941/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is a major global health challenge, and the treatment of proximal GC in particular presents unique clinical and surgical complexities. Currently, there is no consensus on whether proximal gastrectomy (PG) or total gastrectomy (TG) should be used for advanced proximal GC, and the choice of postoperative gastrointestinal reconstruction method remains controversial.

AIM

To compare the short-term efficacy, long-term survival, and postoperative reflux outcomes of PG with tubular stomach reconstruction TG with Roux-en-Y reconstruction in patients with proximal GC following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in an effort to provide valuable insights for clinical decision-making regarding the optimal surgical approach.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at two Chinese medical centers between December, 2012 and December, 2022. Patients with histologically confirmed proximal GC who received NACT followed by either PG with tubular stomach reconstruction or TG with Roux-en-Y reconstruction were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline characteristics, and the primary endpoint was 5-year overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included recurrence-free survival (RFS), postoperative complications, and reflux severity.

RESULTS

After PSM, 244 patients (122 PG, 122 TG) were finally included and all baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. The PG group had a significantly shorter operation time compared to the TG group (189.50 215.00 minutes, < 0.001), with no differences in intraoperative blood loss or postoperative complications (19.68% 14.75%, = 0.792). The 5-year OS rates were 52.7% 45.5% ( = 0.330), and 5-year RFS rates were 54.3% 47.6% ( = 0.356) for the PG and TG groups, respectively. Reflux symptoms (18.0% 31.1%, = 0.017) and clinically significant reflux based on gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire scores ≥ 8 (7.4% 21.3%, < 0.001) were significantly less frequent in the PG group. Multivariate analysis identified histological differentiation (HR = 2.98, 95%CI: 2.03-4.36, < 0.001) and tumor size (HR = 0.26, 95%CI: 0.17-0.41 for tumors ≤ 4 cm, < 0.001) as independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

PG with tubular stomach reconstruction is comparable to TG in terms of surgical safety and long-term oncological outcomes for proximal GC patients following NACT. Additionally, PG has the advantages of shorter operation time and lower rates of postoperative reflux, suggesting potential benefits for patient quality of life. Notably, the analysis of postoperative prognostic factors, including histological differentiation and tumor size, further informs clinical decision-making and highlights the importance of individualized treatment strategies.

摘要

背景

胃癌是一项重大的全球健康挑战,尤其是近端胃癌的治疗存在独特的临床和手术复杂性。目前,对于晚期近端胃癌应采用近端胃切除术(PG)还是全胃切除术(TG)尚无共识,术后胃肠道重建方法的选择也仍存在争议。

目的

比较新辅助化疗(NACT)后近端胃癌患者接受PG联合管状胃重建与TG联合Roux-en-Y重建的短期疗效、长期生存及术后反流情况,以便为最佳手术方式的临床决策提供有价值的见解。

方法

2012年12月至2022年12月期间在两家中国医疗中心进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究。纳入经组织学确诊的近端胃癌患者,这些患者接受了NACT后行PG联合管状胃重建或TG联合Roux-en-Y重建。进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)以平衡基线特征,主要终点为5年总生存(OS)。次要终点包括无复发生存(RFS)、术后并发症及反流严重程度。

结果

PSM后,最终纳入244例患者(122例PG,122例TG),两组间所有基线特征具有可比性。与TG组相比,PG组手术时间显著更短(189.50对215.00分钟,P<0.001),术中出血量及术后并发症无差异(19.68%对14.75%,P=0.792)。PG组和TG组的5年OS率分别为52.7%对45.5%(P=0.330),5年RFS率分别为54.3%对47.6%(P=0.356)。PG组的反流症状(18.0%对31.1%,P=0.017)及基于胃食管反流病问卷评分≥8的临床显著反流(7.4%对21.3%,P<0.001)频率显著更低。多因素分析确定组织学分化(HR=2.98,95%CI:2.03-4.36,P<0.001)和肿瘤大小(肿瘤≤4 cm时HR=0.26,95%CI:0.17-0.41,P<0.001)为独立预后因素。

结论

对于NACT后的近端胃癌患者,PG联合管状胃重建在手术安全性和长期肿瘤学结局方面与TG相当。此外,PG具有手术时间短和术后反流率低的优势,提示对患者生活质量有潜在益处。值得注意的是,对术后预后因素的分析,包括组织学分化和肿瘤大小,进一步为临床决策提供依据,并突出了个体化治疗策略的重要性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5914/12149941/fa7a55fbacc7/107579-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5914/12149941/de7de38844df/107579-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5914/12149941/52c3619a8741/107579-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5914/12149941/fa7a55fbacc7/107579-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5914/12149941/de7de38844df/107579-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5914/12149941/52c3619a8741/107579-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5914/12149941/fa7a55fbacc7/107579-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Proximal gastrectomy with tubular stomach reconstruction total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A multicenter retrospective study.新辅助化疗后近端胃癌行近端胃切除术联合管状胃重建与全胃切除术:一项多中心回顾性研究。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 May 27;17(5):107579. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i5.107579.
2
[Comparison of clinical efficacy between proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for proximal gastric cancer].近端胃癌行近端胃切除术双通路重建与全胃切除术Roux-en-Y重建的临床疗效比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Aug 25;22(8):767-773. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0274.2019.08.012.
3
[Comparison of quality-of-life after proximal gastrectomy with double tract reconstruction versus gastric tube reconstruction in patients with proximal gastric cancer].近端胃癌患者近端胃切除术后双通路重建与胃管重建的生活质量比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Dec 25;26(12):1162-1170. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20230204-00026.
4
Total versus proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.新辅助化疗后近端胃癌行全胃切除术与近端胃切除术的比较:一项多中心回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):1000-1007. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000927.
5
[Short-term outcomes and long-term quality of life after undergoing radical proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A propensity score matching analysis].[食管胃交界部Siewert II型和III型腺癌行近端胃根治性切除食管胃管吻合术及全胃切除Roux-en-Y吻合术后的短期结局和长期生活质量:一项倾向评分匹配分析]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2023 Feb 25;26(2):181-190. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20220728-00330.
6
Can proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction replace total gastrectomy? a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies.近端胃切除术联合双通道重建能否替代全胃切除术?一项随机对照试验和倾向评分匹配研究的荟萃分析。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 23;24(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03323-7.
7
Comparison of proximal gastrectomy with tubular esophagogastric anastomosis and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction in the treatment of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction of Siewert type II/III at stage II.比较近端胃切除术伴管状食管胃吻合术与全胃切除术伴 Roux-en-Y 重建治疗 Siewert Ⅱ/Ⅲ型食管胃结合部腺癌Ⅱ期。
BMC Surg. 2024 Nov 30;24(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02685-9.
8
Clinical efficacy and safety of double-channel anastomosis and tubular gastroesophageal anastomosis in gastrectomy.双通道吻合术与管状胃食管吻合术在胃癌根治术中的临床疗效及安全性
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):2012-2022. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2012.
9
Outcomes of Proximal Versus Total Gastrectomy for Proximal Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of a Western Center Experience.近端胃癌行近端胃切除术与全胃切除术的疗效比较:西方中心经验的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Aug;27(8):1560-1567. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05686-w. Epub 2023 May 2.
10
Clinical outcomes of double-flap technique versus gastric tube reconstruction following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a multicenter propensity score-matched cohort study.腹腔镜近端胃切除术后双瓣技术与胃管重建的临床结局:一项多中心倾向评分匹配队列研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar 29;23(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03672-x.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comprehensive and Comparative Review of Global Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines: 2024 Update.《全球胃癌治疗指南综合与比较性综述:2024年更新》
J Gastric Cancer. 2025 Jan;25(1):153-176. doi: 10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e10.
2
Pathologic Response of Phase III Study: Perioperative Camrelizumab Plus Rivoceranib and Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (DRAGON IV/CAP 05).III期研究的病理反应:围手术期卡瑞利珠单抗联合瑞戈非尼及化疗对比单纯化疗治疗局部进展期胃癌(DRAGON IV/CAP 05)
J Clin Oncol. 2025 Feb;43(4):464-474. doi: 10.1200/JCO.24.00795. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
3
Comparing survival after proximal gastrectomy vs. total gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.
进展期胃癌近端胃切除术与全胃切除术的生存比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Oncol Lett. 2024 Jul 5;28(3):427. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14560. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Assessing Nutritional Status in Gastric Cancer Patients after Total versus Subtotal Gastrectomy: Cross-Sectional Study.胃癌患者全胃与次全胃切除术后营养状况评估:横断面研究。
Nutrients. 2024 May 14;16(10):1485. doi: 10.3390/nu16101485.
5
Gastric Cancer Surgery: Balancing Oncological Efficacy against Postoperative Morbidity and Function Detriment.胃癌手术:平衡肿瘤学疗效与术后并发症及功能损害
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 29;16(9):1741. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091741.
6
Perioperative versus adjuvant S-1 plus oxaliplatin chemotherapy for stage II/III resectable gastric cancer (RESONANCE): a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial.可切除 II/III 期胃癌患者围手术期与辅助 S-1 联合奥沙利铂化疗的比较(RESONANCE):一项随机、开放标签、III 期临床试验。
J Hematol Oncol. 2024 Apr 8;17(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s13045-024-01536-7.
7
Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.2022 年全球癌症统计数据:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率全球估计数。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
8
Neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-585): an interim analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 study.新辅助和辅助帕博利珠单抗联合化疗治疗局部晚期胃或胃食管交界癌(KEYNOTE-585):多中心、双盲、随机 3 期研究的中期分析。
Lancet Oncol. 2024 Feb;25(2):212-224. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00541-7. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
9
Total versus proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.新辅助化疗后近端胃癌行全胃切除术与近端胃切除术的比较:一项多中心回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Feb 1;110(2):1000-1007. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000927.
10
Perioperative Atezolizumab Plus Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Docetaxel for Resectable Esophagogastric Cancer: Interim Results From the Randomized, Multicenter, Phase II/III DANTE/IKF-s633 Trial.可切除食管胃结合部腺癌患者围手术期使用阿替利珠单抗联合氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙、奥沙利铂和多西他赛治疗的随机、多中心、Ⅱ/Ⅲ期 DANTE/IKF-s633 试验的中期结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Feb 1;42(4):410-420. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.00975. Epub 2023 Nov 14.