Bhushan Bharat, Jayapriya D, Bage Atul Mukul
Department of ENT, Aarupadai Veedu Medical College, Puducherry, India.
Department of ENT, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences, Puducherry, India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jul;77(7):2480-2486. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05527-z. Epub 2025 May 20.
Acute rhinosinusitis is a common inflammatory condition characterized by the inflammation of the paranasal sinuses. The use of saline irrigation in the nasal passages is a well-established and effective approach for managing both acute and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), allergic or nonallergic, atrophic rhinitis, facilitating postoperative care following endoscopic sinus surgery as well [4]. Various topical agents can be added to lavage solution. Among this mupirocin has notable anti-staphylococcal properties. To study and compare the efficacy of mupirocin nasal irrigation with saline nasal irrigation in reducing symptoms and duration of treatment in the case of acute rhinosinusitis. In AVMC Pondicherry a randomized double blinded trial was carried out. A total of 50 patients diagnosed with acute rhinosinusitis are selected and equally divided into two groups. One group was given mupirocin nasal irrigation solution, other group was given saline nasal irrigation solution. Patient's symptoms were evaluated at Different visits and mean symptomatic score (MSS) was used to gather data. The mean age of participants in both Group A and Group B is approximately 41.3 ( 11.632) years and 39.8( years. The percentage distribution of male and female subjects is 44.0% and 56.0% in group A and in group B 36.0% and 64.0% in this present study. There was no statistical variation found in mean major symptom score between group A and group B for day 0 (0.090), but there was a statistical variation found in mean major symptom score between group A and group B for day 5 (0.04*) and day 10 (0.02*). There was no statistical variation found in duration of antibiotics course between group A and group B was 0.05*. Both mupirocin nasal irrigation and saline nasal irrigation are effective in reducing symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis. However, mupirocin nasal irrigation appears to lead to more rapid improvement in symptom severity and but may not help reduce the duration of antibiotic therapy compared to saline nasal irrigation.
急性鼻窦炎是一种常见的炎症性疾病,其特征为鼻窦的炎症。在鼻腔中使用盐水冲洗是一种既定且有效的方法,可用于治疗急性和慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)、过敏性或非过敏性鼻窦炎、萎缩性鼻炎,也有助于鼻内镜鼻窦手术后的护理 [4]。各种局部用药可添加到灌洗溶液中。其中,莫匹罗星具有显著的抗葡萄球菌特性。为研究并比较莫匹罗星鼻腔冲洗与盐水鼻腔冲洗在减轻急性鼻窦炎症状及缩短治疗疗程方面的疗效。在本地治里的AVMC进行了一项随机双盲试验。共选取50例诊断为急性鼻窦炎的患者,并将其平均分为两组。一组给予莫匹罗星鼻腔冲洗液,另一组给予盐水鼻腔冲洗液。在不同访视时评估患者症状,并使用平均症状评分(MSS)收集数据。A组和B组参与者的平均年龄分别约为41.3(±11.632)岁和39.8岁。在本研究中,A组男性和女性受试者的百分比分布分别为44.0%和56.0%,B组为36.0%和64.0%。A组和B组在第0天的平均主要症状评分无统计学差异(0.090),但在第5天(0.04*)和第10天(0.02*),A组和B组的平均主要症状评分存在统计学差异。A组和B组抗生素疗程的持续时间无统计学差异(0.05*)。莫匹罗星鼻腔冲洗和盐水鼻腔冲洗均能有效减轻急性鼻窦炎的症状。然而,与盐水鼻腔冲洗相比,莫匹罗星鼻腔冲洗似乎能使症状严重程度更快改善,但可能无助于缩短抗生素治疗疗程。