Dinh Hoai T P, Ushirozako Hiroki, Hasegawa Tomohiko, Ebata Shigeto, Ohba Tetsuro, Oba Hiroki, Mukaiyama Keijiro, Yamato Yu, Yoshida Go, Banno Tomohiro, Arima Hideyuki, Oe Shin, Ide Koichiro, Yamada Tomohiro, Kurosu Kenta, Ojima Toshiyuki, Takahashi Jun, Haro Hirotaka, Matsuyama Yukihiro
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Morimachi Public Hospital, Mori, Japan.
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2024 Dec 10;9(3):339-349. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.2024-0241. eCollection 2025 May 27.
Cage subsidence (CS) after posterior or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF or TLIF) is challenging; however, its impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the impact of CS occurrence on HRQOL and identify the risk factors in patients following PLIF or TLIF.
A total of 138 patients (mean age, 67 years; follow-up period, 12 months) who underwent single-level PLIF or TLIF were retrospectively analyzed. CS was defined as >1 mm sinking of the intervertebral cage evaluated via computed tomography. The patients were divided into the CS and nonsubsidence (NS) groups. HRQOL was assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores.
Among the 138 patients, 30 (22%) developed CS following PLIF or TLIF. All cases with TLIF surgery (n=25) involved the use of one cage. A significant difference was observed in the use of two cages between the CS and NS groups (20.0% vs. 48.1%; =0.006). The CS group had lower occupancy rate of autograft soon after the operation than the NS groups (=0.002), and the occupancy rate of autograft tended to decrease in the CS group compared with the NS group over time. The ODI scores improved in both groups postoperatively; however, the NS group exhibited greater improvements in ODI scores from 4 months postoperatively. The CS group had a significantly lower proportion of patients with intervertebral osseous union at 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared with the NS group (=0.003 and <0.001, respectively).
The use of two intervertebral cages may enhance initial stability and reduce CS risk after PLIF. Initial intervertebral stability was crucial to preventing CS occurrence, as evidenced by the high occupancy rates of autograft in patients without CS. Surgical factors, including surgical strategy and intraoperative techniques, should be considered to prevent CS occurrence and to improve surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction.
后路或经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF或TLIF)后椎间融合器下沉(CS)是一个具有挑战性的问题;然而,其对健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的影响仍不明确。本研究旨在探讨CS的发生对HRQOL的影响,并确定PLIF或TLIF术后患者的危险因素。
对138例行单节段PLIF或TLIF的患者(平均年龄67岁;随访期12个月)进行回顾性分析。CS定义为通过计算机断层扫描评估椎间融合器下沉>1mm。将患者分为CS组和无下沉(NS)组。使用Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)评分评估HRQOL。
在138例患者中,30例(22%)在PLIF或TLIF后发生CS。所有TLIF手术病例(n=25)均使用了一个椎间融合器。CS组和NS组在使用两个椎间融合器方面存在显著差异(20.0%对48.1%;P=0.006)。CS组术后早期自体骨移植的占有率低于NS组(P=0.002),且随着时间的推移,CS组自体骨移植的占有率与NS组相比有下降趋势。两组术后ODI评分均有所改善;然而,NS组术后4个月起ODI评分改善更大。与NS组相比,CS组术后6个月和12个月椎间骨性融合的患者比例显著更低(分别为P=0.003和P<0.001)。
使用两个椎间融合器可能会增强PLIF术后的初始稳定性并降低CS风险。初始椎间稳定性对于预防CS的发生至关重要,无CS患者自体骨移植的高占有率证明了这一点。应考虑包括手术策略和术中技术在内的手术因素,以预防CS的发生并改善手术效果和患者满意度。