• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科食管损伤患者穿孔相关严重程度及不良结局的预测

Prediction of Severity and Adverse Outcomes Associated with Perforation in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Esophageal Injury.

作者信息

Jeong Eui Sun, Jung Hye-Kyung, Byeon Ju Ran, Lee Ayoung, Hong Ji Taek, Kim Seong-Eun, Moon Chang Mo

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res. 2023 Mar;23(1):42-51. doi: 10.7704/kjhugr.2022.0057. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

DOI:10.7704/kjhugr.2022.0057
PMID:40503376
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11967457/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Esophageal perforation is associated with high mortality and morbidity in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with esophageal injury. We investigated the effectiveness of initial CT scan in patients with esophageal injury to determine the risk factors for complications.

METHODS

Patients admitted through the ED for evaluation of esophageal injuries between January 2001 and May 2020, were investigated. Demographic data, etiological factors, comorbidities, treatment administered, and outcomes were collected. Esophageal injury was graded based on the following CT criteria: (a) normal, (b) pneumomediastinum, (c) mediastinitis, fluid collection, abscess, or overt esophageal wall injury, and (d) pleural effusion, subcutaneous emphysema, or pneumothorax. Grade 2 was defined as microperforation and grades 3 and 4 as overt perforation.

RESULTS

Of 281 patients with esophageal injury, 38 had CT-documented overt perforations and 20 had microperforations. Foreign body-induced injury (n=37), Boerhaave syndrome (n=12), and chemical injury (n=3) were common causes of esophageal injury. Complications occurred in 24 (8.5%) patients. Risk factors for complications were age ≥65 years (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.1814.56, =0.027), cerebrovascular disease (OR 8.58, 95% CI 1.1365.19, =0.038), Boerhaave syndrome (OR 12.52, 95% CI 2.0775.68, =0.006), chemical injury (OR 15.72, 95% CI 3.6767.28, <0.001), and CT-documented grade 4 perforation (OR 15.75, 95% CI 4.39~56.55, <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Initial CT-based grading in the ED are useful for predicting potential complications and for managing patients with esophageal injury and suspected perforation.

摘要

背景/目的:在因食管损伤就诊于急诊科(ED)的患者中,食管穿孔与高死亡率和高发病率相关。我们研究了初始CT扫描对食管损伤患者的有效性,以确定并发症的危险因素。

方法

对2001年1月至2020年5月期间通过急诊科收治以评估食管损伤的患者进行研究。收集人口统计学数据、病因、合并症、所给予的治疗及结局。根据以下CT标准对食管损伤进行分级:(a)正常;(b)纵隔气肿;(c)纵隔炎、液体积聚、脓肿或明显的食管壁损伤;(d)胸腔积液、皮下气肿或气胸。2级定义为微穿孔,3级和4级为明显穿孔。

结果

在281例食管损伤患者中,38例有CT记录的明显穿孔,20例有微穿孔。异物所致损伤(n = 37)、博雷尔综合征(n = 12)和化学损伤(n = 3)是食管损伤的常见原因。24例(8.5%)患者发生并发症。并发症的危险因素为年龄≥65岁(比值比4.14,95%置信区间1.1814.56,P = 0.(此处原文有误,推测应为0.027))、脑血管疾病(比值比8.58,95%置信区间1.1365.19,P = 0.038)、博雷尔综合征(比值比12.52,95%置信区间2.0775.68,P = 0.006)、化学损伤(比值比15.72,95%置信区间3.6767.28,P<0.001)以及CT记录的4级穿孔(比值比15.75,95%置信区间4.39~56.55,P<0.001)。

结论

急诊科基于CT的初始分级有助于预测潜在并发症,并有助于管理食管损伤和疑似穿孔的患者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e270/11967457/8b41f5153621/kjhugr-2022-0057f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e270/11967457/fd9b34731cca/kjhugr-2022-0057f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e270/11967457/73bb26dc3676/kjhugr-2022-0057f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e270/11967457/8b41f5153621/kjhugr-2022-0057f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e270/11967457/fd9b34731cca/kjhugr-2022-0057f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e270/11967457/73bb26dc3676/kjhugr-2022-0057f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e270/11967457/8b41f5153621/kjhugr-2022-0057f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of Severity and Adverse Outcomes Associated with Perforation in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Esophageal Injury.急诊科食管损伤患者穿孔相关严重程度及不良结局的预测
Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res. 2023 Mar;23(1):42-51. doi: 10.7704/kjhugr.2022.0057. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
Mediastinal fluid as a predictor for esophageal perforation as the cause of pneumomediastinum.纵隔积气的病因是食管穿孔。纵隔积气可作为食管穿孔的预测指标。
Emerg Radiol. 2021 Apr;28(2):233-238. doi: 10.1007/s10140-020-01841-x. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
3
Diagnostic Utility of CT and Fluoroscopic Esophagography for Suspected Esophageal Perforation in the Emergency Department.急诊中 CT 和透视食管造影对疑似食管穿孔的诊断价值。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2020 Sep;215(3):631-638. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.22166. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
4
Role of Spiral and Multislice Computed Tomography in the evaluation of traumatic and spontaneous oesophageal perforation. Our experience.螺旋CT和多层螺旋CT在评估创伤性和自发性食管穿孔中的作用。我们的经验。
Radiol Med. 2005 Mar;109(3):252-9.
5
Challenges in the diagnosis of Boerhaave syndrome: A case report.博雷尔哈夫综合征诊断中的挑战:一例报告。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jan;99(2):e18765. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018765.
6
Hydropneumothorax Due to Esophageal Rupture.食管破裂所致血气胸
J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;52(6):856-858. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.02.006. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
7
A case of rapid diagnosis of Boerhaave syndrome by thoracic drainage.一例通过胸腔引流快速诊断的博雷尔哈夫综合征病例。
J Emerg Med. 2012 Dec;43(6):e419-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.05.079. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
8
Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality in Esophageal Perforation: Retrospective Study of 80 Patients.食管穿孔发病率及死亡率的预测因素:80例患者的回顾性研究
Scand J Surg. 2017 Jun;106(2):126-132. doi: 10.1177/1457496916654097. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
9
Boerhaave syndrome presenting black pleural effusion: A case report.表现为黑色胸腔积液的博赫哈夫综合征:一例报告。
Respir Med Case Rep. 2022 Nov 12;40:101781. doi: 10.1016/j.rmcr.2022.101781. eCollection 2022.
10
Classification of the oesophageal perforation.食管穿孔的分类。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jul 1;29(1):352. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01910-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Nonoperative Treatment in Esophageal Perforation Caused by Foreign Bodies.异物导致食管穿孔的非手术治疗的安全性和疗效。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 19;13(1):e00451. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000451.
2
Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement - Update 2020.医源性内镜穿孔的诊断和处理:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)立场声明——2020 年更新。
Endoscopy. 2020 Sep;52(9):792-810. doi: 10.1055/a-1222-3191. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
3
Retrospective observational analysis of esophageal foreign bodies: a novel characterization based on shape.
食管异物的回顾性观察分析:一种基于形状的新特征描述。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 6;10(1):4273. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61207-8.
4
Clinical outcomes of iatrogenic upper gastrointestinal endoscopic perforation: a 10-year study.医源性上消化道内镜穿孔的临床转归:一项 10 年研究。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2019 Dec 16;19(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1139-1.
5
Esophageal emergencies: WSES guidelines.食管急症:WSES 指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2019 May 31;14:26. doi: 10.1186/s13017-019-0245-2. eCollection 2019.
6
Caustic ingestion.腐蚀性物质摄入。
Lancet. 2017 May 20;389(10083):2041-2052. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30313-0. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
7
Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality in Esophageal Perforation: Retrospective Study of 80 Patients.食管穿孔发病率及死亡率的预测因素:80例患者的回顾性研究
Scand J Surg. 2017 Jun;106(2):126-132. doi: 10.1177/1457496916654097. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
8
Esophageal perforation.食管穿孔。
Surg Clin North Am. 2014 Feb;94(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
9
Efficacy of surgical versus conservative treatment in esophageal perforation: a systematic review of case series studies.手术治疗与保守治疗在食管穿孔中的疗效:病例系列研究的系统评价
Acta Cir Bras. 2013 Apr;28(4):266-71. doi: 10.1590/s0102-86502013000400006.
10
Current treatment and outcome of esophageal perforations in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of 75 studies.成人食管穿孔的当前治疗和结局:75 项研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Surg. 2013 May;37(5):1051-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-1951-7.