Xie Fang, Qi Ai-Hua, Pan Fan, Zhang Ying, Gan Ning, Xu Xiao-Tao, Wang Ai-Zhong, Zhang Nan-Nan
Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Int J Surg. 2025 Jun 12;111(9):6460-4. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002717.
Regional nerve block, as an anesthetic technique, can enhance postoperative recovery for patients. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) remains a critical concern for patients undergoing elbow joint release surgery. This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether combining regional nerve block (RNB) with general anesthesia (GA) improves cognitive outcomes compared to GA alone.
A single-center and single-blind (outcome assessors and analysts blinded) observation study. Seventy-four patients (ASA I-II, aged 18-65 years, BMI < 26 kg/m2) undergoing elbow joint release surgery were randomly assigned to either a control group (GA alone) or an observation group (Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block: 20 mL 0.375% ropivacaine + GA). Primary outcome was MMSE scores on Pre-op D 1 (preoperative day 1), POD 1 (postoperative day 1), and POD 3 (postoperative day 3). Secondary outcomes included awakening time, extubation time, VAS scores at 1, 6, 12 hours after extubation and hemodynamic parameters at different time points.
The MMSE scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group both on the POD 1 (23.06 ± 1.01 vs 20.50 ± 0.51, mean difference 2.56 [95% CI 2.18 to 2.93]; P < 0.001) and POD 3 (25.56 ± 0.51 vs 23.36 ± 0.49, mean difference 2.19 [95% CI 1.96 to 2.43]; P < 0.001). The postoperative awakening time (3.50 ± 0.56 vs 11.83 ± 1.00 min, mean difference -8.33 [95% CI -8.71 to -7.95]; p < 0.001) and extubation time (3.50 ± 0.56 vs 13.08 ± 0.84 min, mean difference -9.58 [95% CI -9.92 to -9.25]; p < 0.001) in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group. Furthermore, Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at 1 hour (1.28 ± 0.61 vs 4.92 ± 0.77, mean difference -3.64 [95% CI -3.97 to -3.31]; p < 0.001), 6 hours (1.36 ± 0.54 vs 5.67 ± 0.68, mean difference -4.31 [95% CI -4.59 to -4.02]; p < 0.001), and 12 hours post-extubation(3.44 ± 0.50 vs 7.67 ± 0.48, mean difference -4.22 [95% CI -4.45 to -3.99]; p < 0.001). Hemodynamic stability was superior in the observation group across perioperative phases.
Combining RNB with GA preserves postoperative cognitive function, accelerates recovery, and enhances analgesia in elbow joint release surgery. These findings support RNB as an adjunct to GA to mitigate POCD.
区域神经阻滞作为一种麻醉技术,可促进患者术后恢复。术后认知功能障碍(POCD)仍是接受肘关节松解手术患者的一个关键问题。本随机对照试验评估了与单纯全身麻醉(GA)相比,区域神经阻滞(RNB)联合全身麻醉(GA)是否能改善认知结局。
一项单中心、单盲(结果评估者和分析者设盲)观察性研究。74例接受肘关节松解手术的患者(ASA I-II级,年龄18-65岁,BMI<26kg/m²)被随机分为对照组(单纯GA)或观察组(超声引导下臂丛神经阻滞:20mL 0.375%罗哌卡因+GA)。主要结局指标为术前第1天(Pre-op D 1)、术后第1天(POD 1)和术后第3天(POD 3)的简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)评分。次要结局指标包括苏醒时间、拔管时间、拔管后1、6、12小时的视觉模拟评分(VAS)以及不同时间点的血流动力学参数。
观察组在术后第1天(23.06±1.01 vs 20.50±0.51,平均差值2.56[95%CI 2.18至2.93];P<0.001)和术后第3天(25.56±0.51 vs 23.36±0.49,平均差值2.19[95%CI 1.96至2.43];P<0.001)的MMSE评分显著高于对照组。观察组术后苏醒时间(3.50±0.56 vs 11.83±1.00分钟,平均差值-8.33[95%CI -8.71至-7.95];p<0.001)和拔管时间(3.50±0.56 vs 13.08±0.84分钟,平均差值-9.58[95%CI -9.92至-9.25];p<0.001)显著短于对照组。此外,观察组在拔管后1小时(1.28±0.61 vs 4.92±0.77,平均差值-3.64[95%CI -3.97至-3.31];p<0.001)、6小时(1.36±0.54 vs 5.67±0.68,平均差值-4.31[95%CI -4.59至-4.02];p<0.001)和12小时(3.44±0.50 vs 7.67±0.48,平均差值-4.22[95%CI -4.45至-3.99];p<0.001)的VAS评分低于对照组。观察组在围手术期各阶段的血流动力学稳定性更佳。
在肘关节松解手术中,RNB联合GA可保留术后认知功能,加速恢复并增强镇痛效果。这些发现支持将RNB作为GA的辅助手段以减轻POCD。