He Wensheng, Wu Zhenyu, Su Shan, Huang Zengping
Department of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, 518000, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, 066000, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 20;15(1):9555. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93881-x.
Shoulder arthroscopy has become a common procedure, but it is often associated with severe postoperative pain. This study aims to evaluate the analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided coracoid approach brachial plexus block combined with posterior suprascapular nerve block in shoulder arthroscopy. To this end, fifty patients undergoing right shoulder arthroscopy were randomly divided into two groups with 25 patients in each group. Before induction of general anesthesia, patients in the two groups received different nerve blocks. In Group A, participants received ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block with 25 mL 0.3% ropivacaine. In Group B, coracoid approach brachial plexus block and posterior suprascapular nerve block were carried out under ultrasound guidance. M-mode ultrasound was used to measure diaphragm movement before and 30 min after the block, and the presence of hemidiaphragm paralysis was recorded during calm breathing and deep breathing. Pain scores were recorded at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery. The actual press times of the PCA pump and consumption of sufentanil were also recorded.A total of 45 patients completed this study. The incidence of hemidiaphragm paralysis in Group B was significantly lower than that in Group A under both calm breathing and deep breathing. The two groups displayed similar pain scores at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery. Compared with supraclavicular brachial plexus block, coracoid approach brachial plexus block combined with posterior suprascapular nerve block can significantly reduce the occurrence of hemidiaphragm paralysis with an equivalent postoperative analgesic effect for shoulder arthroscopy. Therefore, the latter may be beneficial for early postoperative recovery in patients who cannot tolerate hemidiaphragm paralysis. Trial registration: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ID ChiCTR2100043069) on 04/02/2021.
肩关节镜检查已成为一种常见的手术,但它常常与严重的术后疼痛相关。本研究旨在评估超声引导下喙突入路臂丛神经阻滞联合肩胛上神经后支阻滞在肩关节镜检查中的镇痛效果。为此,将50例行右肩关节镜检查的患者随机分为两组,每组25例。在全身麻醉诱导前,两组患者接受不同的神经阻滞。A组患者接受超声引导下锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞,使用25 mL 0.3%罗哌卡因。B组在超声引导下进行喙突入路臂丛神经阻滞和肩胛上神经后支阻滞。在阻滞前和阻滞后30分钟使用M型超声测量膈肌运动,并记录平静呼吸和深呼吸时半侧膈肌麻痹的情况。记录术后1、6、12、24和48小时的疼痛评分。还记录了PCA泵的实际按压次数和舒芬太尼的消耗量。
共有45例患者完成了本研究。在平静呼吸和深呼吸时,B组半侧膈肌麻痹的发生率均显著低于A组。两组在术后1、6、12、24和48小时的疼痛评分相似。与锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞相比,喙突入路臂丛神经阻滞联合肩胛上神经后支阻滞可显著降低半侧膈肌麻痹的发生率,对肩关节镜检查具有同等的术后镇痛效果。因此,后者可能有利于不能耐受半侧膈肌麻痹的患者术后早期恢复。试验注册:本研究于2021年2月4日在中国临床试验注册中心注册(注册号:ChiCTR2100043069)。