• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典脊柱手术治疗中央型腰椎管狭窄症和腰椎间盘突出症数据的有效性和准确性:一项对796例患者的队列研究。

Validity and accuracy of swespine data on surgery for central lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar disc herniation: a cohort study of 796 patients.

作者信息

Wegdell Gustav, Albarni Abdulrahman, Åkerstedt Josefin, Endler Peter, Gerdhem Paul, Själander Anders, Mukka Sebastian, Knutsson Björn

机构信息

Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

RKC Spine Center, Södra Fiskartorpsvägen 15H, 11433 Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09049-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-025-09049-8
PMID:40504239
Abstract

PURPOSE

To validate the Swedish National Spine Registry (Swespine) for diagnostic accuracy and documentation of surgical procedures for central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS) and lumbar disc herniation (LDH), including an analysis of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Additionally, this study evaluates the accuracy and completeness of perioperative data and documented complications.

METHODS

Of 41,312 patients registered in Swespine for CLSS or LDH between January 2017 and December 2022, 800 were randomly selected from four hospitals. The electronic patient records were used as the gold standard. Radiological criteria for CLSS and LDH were established through a review of MRI scans.

RESULTS

The proportion of correctly classified diagnoses (PCC) was 98.5% for CLSS and 99.2% for LDH, while the PCC of the type of surgery was 99.7% and 98.5% in the CLSS and LDH cohorts, respectively. Preoperative MRI analysis showed that 94.2% of patients undergoing CLSS surgery at the narrowest spinal level were classified as Schizas C or D, with a mean cross-sectional area of 44.2 mm². In comparison, 85.0% of patients who underwent LDH surgery were classified with Pfirrman grade 3.

CONCLUSION

Swespine demonstrated high accuracy and completeness in diagnosing and surgically treating CLSS and LDH patients, as corroborated by preoperative MRI assessments. Most perioperative data, including complications, demonstrated acceptable to excellent registration. Improvements are recommended in the documentation of the American Society of Anaesthesiologists classification, patient weight and height, smoking status, use of implants and bone grafts, date of discharge, use of thromboprophylaxis, and previous surgeries.

摘要

目的

验证瑞典国家脊柱登记处(Swespine)在诊断中央腰椎管狭窄症(CLSS)和腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)的准确性以及手术记录方面的情况,包括对术前磁共振成像(MRI)的分析。此外,本研究评估围手术期数据的准确性和完整性以及记录的并发症。

方法

在2017年1月至2022年12月期间在Swespine登记的41312例CLSS或LDH患者中,从四家医院随机选取800例。将电子病历用作金标准。通过对MRI扫描的回顾确定CLSS和LDH的放射学标准。

结果

CLSS的正确分类诊断比例(PCC)为98.5%,LDH为99.2%,而CLSS和LDH队列中手术类型的PCC分别为99.7%和98.5%。术前MRI分析显示,在最狭窄脊柱节段接受CLSS手术的患者中,94.2%被分类为Schizas C或D,平均横截面积为44.2平方毫米。相比之下,接受LDH手术的患者中有85.0%被分类为Pfirrman 3级。

结论

正如术前MRI评估所证实的那样,Swespine在诊断和手术治疗CLSS和LDH患者方面显示出高准确性和完整性。大多数围手术期数据,包括并发症,显示出可接受至优秀的记录水平。建议在麻醉医师协会分类、患者体重和身高、吸烟状况、植入物和骨移植的使用、出院日期、血栓预防措施的使用以及既往手术的记录方面进行改进。

相似文献

1
Validity and accuracy of swespine data on surgery for central lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar disc herniation: a cohort study of 796 patients.瑞典脊柱手术治疗中央型腰椎管狭窄症和腰椎间盘突出症数据的有效性和准确性:一项对796例患者的队列研究。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09049-8.
2
[Early effectiveness of posterior 180-degree decompression via unilateral biportal endoscopy in treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis combined with MSU-1 lumbar disc herniation].[经单侧双通道内镜下后路180°减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症合并MSU-1型腰椎间盘突出症的早期疗效]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Jun 15;39(6):735-740. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.202504083.
3
A Comparative Study of Clinical Outcomes in Full-Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy for Patients With Congenital and Non-Congenital Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis: A Midterm Results.先天性与非先天性腰椎管狭窄症患者全内镜下椎间孔切开术临床疗效的比较研究:中期结果
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;18(1):e70143. doi: 10.1111/ases.70143.
4
Endoscopic Interlaminar Standalone Decompression for Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis With Subligamentous Disc Herniation: A Disc-Preserving Alternative to Discectomy.内镜下单纯椎间孔减压治疗伴后纵韧带下椎间盘突出的腰椎侧隐窝狭窄症:一种保留椎间盘的椎间盘切除术替代方法
Orthop Surg. 2025 Jul;17(7):2093-2102. doi: 10.1111/os.70087. Epub 2025 May 31.
5
Application of Repeated Foraminoplasty in Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation Patients with Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis.重复椎间孔成形术在经皮内镜下腰椎间盘摘除术治疗合并腰椎椎间孔狭窄的腰椎间盘突出症患者中的应用
World Neurosurg. 2025 Mar;195:123647. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.123647. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
6
Surgical options for lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症的手术治疗选择
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 1;11(11):CD012421. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012421.
7
What Are Long-term Predictors of Outcomes for Lumbar Disc Herniation? A Randomized and Observational Study.腰椎间盘突出症预后的长期预测因素有哪些?一项随机观察研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Jun;473(6):1920-30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3803-7.
8
[Imaging changes of the intervertebral disc after posterior cervical single door enlarged laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenosis with disc herniation].[后路单开门扩大成形术治疗颈椎管狭窄症合并椎间盘突出症后椎间盘的影像学变化]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2025 Jun 25;38(6):572-80. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.20230109.
9
Is discectomy effective for treating low back pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation and Modic changes? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.椎间盘切除术对伴有腰椎间盘突出症和Modic改变的患者治疗下腰痛是否有效?一项队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2023 Apr;23(4):533-549. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.10.008. Epub 2022 Oct 31.
10
Evaluation of Hidden Blood Loss and Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopy-Assisted Uni-Portal Spinal Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Lateral Recess Stenosis.关节镜辅助下单通道脊柱手术治疗伴侧隐窝狭窄的腰椎间盘突出症的隐性失血及临床疗效评估
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jun;198:124026. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2025.124026. Epub 2025 Apr 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability of surgeon-reported MRI findings to a national spine register.外科医生向国家脊柱登记处报告的MRI检查结果的可靠性。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2025 Apr 14;167(1):105. doi: 10.1007/s00701-025-06524-5.
2
The Swedish Perioperative Register: Description, validation of data mapping and utility.瑞典围手术期注册研究:描述、数据映射验证和实用性。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2023 Feb;67(2):233-239. doi: 10.1111/aas.14174. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
3
Accuracy and agreement of national spine register data for 474 patients compared to corresponding electronic patient records.
474名患者的国家脊柱登记数据与相应电子病历的准确性和一致性。
Eur Spine J. 2022 Mar;31(3):801-811. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-07093-8. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
4
Completeness and accuracy of data in spine registries: an independent audit-based study.脊柱注册研究中数据的完整性和准确性:一项基于独立审核的研究。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Jun;29(6):1453-1461. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06342-6. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
5
An automated data verification approach for improving data quality in a clinical registry.一种自动化数据验证方法,用于提高临床注册中的数据质量。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Nov;181:104840. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.01.012. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
6
Role of prospective registries in defining the value and effectiveness of spine care.前瞻性注册登记在确定脊柱治疗的价值和有效性方面的作用。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Oct 15;39(22 Suppl 1):S117-28. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000552.
7
Consensus conference on core radiological parameters to describe lumbar stenosis - an initiative for structured reporting.腰椎狭窄症核心放射学参数共识会议——旨在实现结构化报告的倡议。
Eur Radiol. 2014 Dec;24(12):3224-32. doi: 10.1007/s00330-014-3346-z. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
8
Swespine: the Swedish spine register : the 2012 report.Swespine:瑞典脊柱注册中心报告:2012 年度报告。
Eur Spine J. 2013 Apr;22(4):953-74. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2758-9.
9
Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images.基于磁共振图像硬膜囊形态的腰椎管狭窄严重程度的定性分级。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 1;35(21):1919-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd.
10
The Swedish personal identity number: possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research.瑞典个人身份证号码:在医疗保健和医学研究中的可能性和陷阱。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2009;24(11):659-67. doi: 10.1007/s10654-009-9350-y. Epub 2009 Jun 6.