• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“让我们谈谈风险”:共同设计一条评估、沟通并应对乳腺癌后长期毒性个体风险的途径。

"Let's talk about risk": co-designing a pathway to assess, communicate and act on individual risk of long-term toxicities after breast cancer.

作者信息

Franzoi Maria Alice, Santolaya Carlota, Martin Elise, Fasse Leonor, Rouby Pascal, Minot-This Marie Sophie, Di Meglio Antonio, Vaz-Luis Ines

机构信息

Cancer Survivorship Group, Molecular Predictors and New Targets in Oncology, INSERM Unit 981, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

Department for the Organization of Patient Pathways (DIOPP), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.

出版信息

J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01826-0.

DOI:10.1007/s11764-025-01826-0
PMID:40504480
Abstract

PURPOSE

Survivors of breast cancer (BC) may endure significant and persistent post-treatment burdens that negatively impact overall quality of life. We previously developed risk prediction algorithms to identify individual patient profiles at increased risk for long-term toxicities. To prepare for the implementation of these risk algorithms in routine care, we performed a study to assess preferences, catalysts, and barriers concerning communication of individual risk of long-term BC toxicities. The goal was to co-design a pathway for risk assessment, communication, and management starting at diagnosis.

METHODS

A co-design study was performed using a participatory research framework and qualitative methods. Two phases of focus groups (FG) were conducted to assess the perspective of patients and providers through an iterative process of Exploration, Consultation, Prioritization, Integration and Co-design. Discussions were guided by four main questions: Who should communicate the risk? When should the risk be communicated? How should the risk be communicated? What information should be communicated, and care proposed?. FG discussions were recorded, pseudo-anonymized, transcribed and evaluated through a thematic content analysis. Results were reported following the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).

RESULTS

Six FG were conducted between July 2022 and August 2023, with a total of 28 participants (8 patients and 20 providers). Results revealed a strong willingness to discuss the risk of long-term toxicities, particularly for patients who would present with a higher risk of toxicities. However, this willingness was contingent on the implementation of supportive care pathways that offer personalized communication strategies and risk mitigation approaches tailored to each patient's need.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that both patients and providers are interested in, and willing to engage in, the assessment, communication and mitigation of long-term toxicities from the time of diagnosis. To address this need in routine care, a tailored pathway was co-designed and will undergo formal testing in a hybrid Type 3 effectiveness/implementation clinical trial (NCT06479057).

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

This study assessed the needs, preferences and expectations of patients and providers for implementing a care pathway to assess, communicate and mitigate the risk of long-term toxicities after breast cancer treatment using risk prediction algorithms.

摘要

目的

乳腺癌(BC)幸存者可能会承受重大且持续的治疗后负担,这会对整体生活质量产生负面影响。我们之前开发了风险预测算法,以识别长期毒性风险增加的个体患者特征。为了准备在常规护理中实施这些风险算法,我们开展了一项研究,以评估关于BC长期毒性个体风险沟通的偏好、促成因素和障碍。目标是共同设计一条从诊断开始的风险评估、沟通和管理途径。

方法

使用参与式研究框架和定性方法进行了一项共同设计研究。通过探索、咨询、优先级排序、整合和共同设计的迭代过程,开展了两个阶段的焦点小组(FG),以评估患者和提供者的观点。讨论由四个主要问题引导:谁应该传达风险?何时传达风险?如何传达风险?应该传达哪些信息并提出何种护理建议?FG讨论进行了录音、伪匿名处理、转录,并通过主题内容分析进行评估。根据定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ)报告结果。

结果

在2022年7月至20日23年8月期间进行了6次FG,共有28名参与者(8名患者和20名提供者)。结果显示,人们强烈愿意讨论长期毒性风险,尤其是对于毒性风险较高的患者。然而,这种意愿取决于是否实施支持性护理途径,该途径提供个性化的沟通策略和根据每个患者需求定制的风险缓解方法。

结论

本研究发现,患者和提供者都对从诊断时起评估、沟通和减轻长期毒性感兴趣并愿意参与。为了在常规护理中满足这一需求,共同设计了一条定制途径,并将在一项混合型3期有效性/实施临床试验(NCT06479057)中进行正式测试。

对癌症幸存者的意义

本研究评估了患者和提供者对于实施护理途径以使用风险预测算法评估、沟通和减轻乳腺癌治疗后长期毒性风险的需求、偏好和期望。

相似文献

1
"Let's talk about risk": co-designing a pathway to assess, communicate and act on individual risk of long-term toxicities after breast cancer.“让我们谈谈风险”:共同设计一条评估、沟通并应对乳腺癌后长期毒性个体风险的途径。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Jun 12. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01826-0.
2
A qualitative process evaluation of community-based participatory research and human-centered design in the 'Let's talk about vaccines' approach in Mozambique and Malawi.对莫桑比克和马拉维“让我们谈谈疫苗”方法中基于社区的参与式研究和以人为本设计的定性过程评估。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Feb 21;11(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00677-4.
3
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Exploring patient-physician communication in breast cancer care for African American women following primary treatment.探索非洲裔美国女性在乳腺癌初次治疗后的医患沟通情况。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2008 Sep;35(5):836-43. doi: 10.1188/08.ONF.836-843.
7
Leadership perspectives on key elements influencing implementing a family-focused intervention in mental health services.领导力视角下影响精神卫生服务中实施以家庭为中心干预的关键要素。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2020 Oct;27(5):616-627. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12615. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Insights About Dyadic Cancer Survivorship Interventions for Black Women and Their Caregivers: A Rapid Qualitative Analysis of Collaborator Perspectives.关于黑人女性及其照顾者的二元癌症幸存者干预措施的见解:对合作者观点的快速定性分析
Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241305583. doi: 10.1177/10732748241305583.
10
Experiences of resuming life after immunotherapy and associated survivorship care needs: a qualitative study among patients with metastatic melanoma.免疫治疗后恢复生活和相关生存护理需求的体验:转移性黑色素瘤患者的定性研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Sep;187(3):381-391. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21670. Epub 2022 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Supportive Care Needs of Newly Diagnosed Cancer Patients in a Comprehensive Cancer Center: Identifying Care Profiles and Future Perspectives.综合癌症中心新诊断癌症患者的支持性护理需求:确定护理概况及未来展望。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 29;16(5):1017. doi: 10.3390/cancers16051017.
2
Prospective study of predictors for anxiety, depression, and somatization in a sample of 1807 cancer patients.前瞻性研究 1807 例癌症患者样本中焦虑、抑郁和躯体化的预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 7;14(1):3188. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53212-y.
3
Standardising the role of a digital navigator in behavioural health: a systematic review.
规范行为健康领域数字导航员的角色:系统评价。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Dec;5(12):e925-e932. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00152-8.
4
Implementing a PROACTive Care Pathway to Empower and Support Survivors of Breast Cancer.实施主动关怀护理路径,赋予乳腺癌幸存者力量并为其提供支持。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2023 Jun;19(6):353-361. doi: 10.1200/OP.23.00016.
5
Cancer statistics, 2023.癌症统计数据,2023 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Jan;73(1):17-48. doi: 10.3322/caac.21763.
6
Engaging TEAM Medicine in Patient Care: Redefining Cancer Survivorship From Diagnosis.参与团队医疗照护:从诊断起重新定义癌症生存。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2022 Apr;42:1-11. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_349391.
7
Supportive Care Interventions for People With Cancer Assisted by Digital Technology: Systematic Review.数字技术辅助癌症患者的支持性护理干预措施:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 29;23(10):e24722. doi: 10.2196/24722.
8
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
The Role of Digital Navigators in Promoting Clinical Care and Technology Integration into Practice.数字导航员在促进临床护理和技术融入实践中的作用。
Digit Biomark. 2020 Nov 26;4(Suppl 1):119-135. doi: 10.1159/000510144. eCollection 2020 Winter.
10
Communicating tailored risk information of cancer treatment side effects: Only words or also numbers?传达癌症治疗副作用的个体化风险信息:只有文字还是也有数字?
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 27;20(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01296-7.